Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!! / Derrick May

2001-03-30 Thread tofugirl
if it ain't broke, don't fix it.. (actually I believe derrick may said that about about the strings of life remix) tofugirl no kidding, his set hasn't changed in about 2 years. Is it just me or does Derrick May tend to play the same records all the time? I would just say buy his mix Cd

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-30 Thread jonathan morse
ok 313'ers...place yer bets now!!! which will compose the larger group - those pissed that he closed last year or those pissed he ain't gonna be there this year? ballots to be distributed at hart plaza. proxy statements for those unable to attend will be posted to the list. =) I can't

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-30 Thread AeOtaku
re: DEMF Jose - never fear! Norma Jean Bell is playing, this means almost assuredly KDJ will be there, either on piano or on turntables, or on something. At least, I would hope. I couldn't imagine Kenny not being at the DEMF, he's one of the few Detroit techno producers who really supports the

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Ohanyan
Its pretty f'n obvious that Derrick May should be there because he started techno, unlike Hawtin. May is an originator, and that is also why he plays imprtant tracks, not just the newest tribal techno crap...he should be at every demf, and hopefully with people as important as the last poets

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-30 Thread Jayson B.
Its pretty f'n obvious that Derrick May should be there because he started techno, unlike Hawtin. May is an originator yeah! Just because May bought a drum machine before hawtin, he CERTAINLY has more credibility. and hopefully with people as important as the last poets do any

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-30 Thread scott mcgill
and fly back and play every club that's open in the UK that weekend. Ubiquitous *^%. Your glasses are definitely half full. Smc - Original Message - From: atomly [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 3:55 AM Subject: Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-30 Thread Cyclone Wehner
I think there are still other names to be announced? I know of at least one name who was confident he was playing a couple of weeks ago - a live set - but who is yet to be announced. It could be a scheduling thing. I believe Richie Hawtin is playing Creamfields this year - maybe it was his choice

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-30 Thread dan ito
actually i was referring to mayday. someone had written something about him on this post. From: Scotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Scotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dan ito [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!! Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:06:13 -0500 no kidding, his set

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Matthew Gerbasi
the fact that he was there last year is more than likely the reason he is not coming this year. have you not noticed that has been the formula mg Matthew Gerbasi |l| Darcy Detroit lll Cadillac Regional Traffic|l| 248-458-8567|l|

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Kyle J Dupuy
the organizers were aware that if they simply rehashed last years lineup, the festival would lose some of it's luster. On 29 Mar 2001, TIMOTHY JOHNSON wrote: I can't believe this hasn't been brought up yet!!! Jeff Mills rules (don't get me wrong) but Ritchie and Larkin were the heart of

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Roger John Lesinski Jr
So why is Derrick May there once again? Just a question. the organizers were aware that if they simply rehashed last years lineup, the festival would lose some of it's luster. On 29 Mar 2001, TIMOTHY JOHNSON wrote: I can't believe this hasn't been brought up yet!!! Jeff Mills rules

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread joshtwentythree
I -love- richie...but...you know...there are other techno people...and like someone pointed out, the lineup is almost entirely different, I've heard richie...I -haven't- heard a whole lot of these people...I'm psyched... josh23 --- TIMOTHY JOHNSON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't believe this

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread george . jones
Buddy-buddy with Carl, I would assume. Roger John Lesinski Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/29/2001 04:08:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kyle J Dupuy) cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!! So why is Derrick May there once again? Just

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread TIMOTHY JOHNSON
Hey now! I'm psyched as hell too! I'm proud to live in the state of the origination of my favorite type of music. Tons of sweet dj's and groups will perform and I can't wait! I'm just saying... no Ritchie. Doesn't that blow? =) BTW I never saw Derrick May last year so I'm psyched about

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Roger John Lesinski Jr
Is it just me or does Derrick May tend to play the same records all the time? I would just say buy his mix Cd and thats all you need. I sure wish I would produce more music rather than djing all the time, but I am guessing the money is too good. Hey now! I'm psyched as hell too! I'm proud

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Rachael Ann Stiegel
OK I love Richie more than I can really explain, but let's think about how many times he has been here since the last DEMFmu1, Plus 8, Record Time, mu2. Even I might say he is getting overplayed. I seriously doubt any future DEMF will have a closing set as incredible to offer as his last

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Dale Lawrence
Yes, there were plenty of people last year that weren't given the opportunity to play. There just weren't enough slots for all the talent. We should be glad that we have enough talent in this city to throw a three

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Lester Kenyatta Spence
On 29 Mar 2001, TIMOTHY JOHNSON wrote: I can't believe this hasn't been brought up yet!!! Jeff Mills rules (don't get me wrong) but Ritchie and Larkin were the heart of the party last year, in my opinion! What is the group consensus? I have no problem with Hawtin's absence.

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Hans Veneman
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:31:16PM -0500, Rachael Ann Stiegel wrote: OK I love Richie more than I can really explain, but let's think about how many times he has been here since the last DEMFmu1, Plus 8, Record Time, mu2. Even I might say he is getting overplayed. I seriously doubt any

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Rachael Ann Stiegel
: 29 Mar 2001 12:17:23 -0800 From: TIMOTHY JOHNSON [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!! Hey now! I'm psyched as hell too! I'm proud to live in the state of the origination of my favorite type of music. Tons of sweet

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Dennis Donohue
should really be greatful for that. Cheers all! Dennis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!! Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:11:26 -0500 Buddy-buddy with Carl, I would assume. Roger John Lesinski Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/29/2001 04:08:38

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread Marshall Banana
I think his set last year was less exciting than many of the other performers. Not a diss, and not to say I didn't enjoy it.. Just my totally subjective personal opinion. Please don't set the evil m-nus nanotech robots after me! totally bummed about the

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread diana potts
some have said the same about Rich's closing performance DEX EFX 909, last year too. can we stop complaining now and just enjoy please. --- Roger John Lesinski Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it just me or does Derrick May tend to play the same records all the time? I would just say

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread David Bate
Here Here some excellent music coming up in late May. You'll definitely be seeing me ... Dave Dale Lawrence wrote: Yes, there were plenty of people last year that weren't given the opportunity to play. There just weren't enough slots for

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread tristan watkins
--- diana potts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: some have said the same about Rich's closing performance DEX EFX 909, last year too. can we stop complaining now and just enjoy please. Yes, let's all raise the cup. It's official! This is the announcement of a festival, perhaps we should be

Re: [313] DEMF no Ritchie Hawtin!!

2001-03-29 Thread darw_n
I seriously doubt any future DEMF will have a closing set as incredible to offer as his last year though. Personally, I thought his set at last years was on the weaker side of things.. It definitely was nice to see that many people, but musically, it was so-so. I have it on CD too, and its