Re: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire

2009-02-18 Thread Wibo Lammerts
erreal.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:08:38 AM > Subject: Re: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire > > On 17 February 2009, kent williams wrote: > >> I've seen loads of DJs play boring sets with no consideration for >> their audience, using good ol vi

Re: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire

2009-02-17 Thread Joel Gajewski
Sasha is a prime example of a boring dj becoming even more boring with Ableton.  - Original Message From: J.C. To: list 313 <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:08:38 AM Subject: Re: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire On 17 February 2009, kent williams

Re: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire

2009-02-17 Thread Martin Dust
On 17 Feb 2009, at 15:55, kent williams wrote: As someone who has embraced Ableton Live as a DJ tool NO not again m

Re: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire

2009-02-17 Thread Zachary Smith
This is the kind of argument I hear from friends who don't like music made with computers/programmable synths/drum machines at all, much less replayed by computers. For them, there's no feeling or 'mistakes' unless it's played on manually-operated instruments like guitars, drums and Peruvian panfl

Re: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire

2009-02-17 Thread kent williams
As someone who has embraced Ableton Live as a DJ tool I have two observations: 1) Removing beat matching from the equation means you don't make beat-matching mistakes. Plenty of other surprises and mistakes are possible. 2) a preprogrammed set doesn't interact with the audience. To the extent I su

RE: (313) re: Mills interview in the Wire

2009-02-17 Thread Martijn de Blaauw
Yeah, it's a bit of a read but well worth it, really, really interesting stuff he talks about. Funny to read that one of the dj's being on the forefront of technology speaks about the fact that all these technological developments (traktor, ableton and so on) will lead to the fact that dj's might