2 PM
>To: Forrest L Norvell; 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: (313) tresor meets apple/Mover - Frontal Frustration
>
>
>At 05:13 AM 2/16/2004, Forrest L Norvell wrote:
>>OK, if you're still with me, there are a number of records I can
>>recommend. Acardipane's defin
At 05:13 AM 2/16/2004, Forrest L Norvell wrote:
OK, if you're still with me, there are a number of records I can
recommend. Acardipane's definitely a 12" guy, and the one record of
his you're most likely to have heard would be the Mescalinium United
"We Have Arrived" remixes that Aphex Twin did y
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:39:50AM -, Ken Odeluga wrote:
> > Marc Acardipane is one of my favorite producers of all time, but
> > that record was a HUGE disappointment. The Mover is all about the
> > doom, and that record was all about... I don't know, boring, cold
> > techno with no atmosphere
>> OK, I'm less familiar with his work. What would you recommend of
>his that's
>> better than this?
>
>check out his productions under alias "Mescalinum United"
>especially "We have arrived". and i happen to like "Alien Christ of
>Suns and Moons" http://www.discogs.com/release/84967
>
>Marc h
Ken Odeluga wrote on Mon, 16 Feb 2004 about following:
> Marc Acardipane is one of my favorite producers of all
> >time, but that record was a HUGE disappointment. The Mover is all
>
> OK, I'm less familiar with his work. What would you recommend of his that's
> better than this?
check out his p
Marc Acardipane is one of my favorite producers of all
>time, but that record was a HUGE disappointment. The Mover is all
>about the doom, and that record was all about... I don't know, boring,
>cold techno with no atmosphere to it.
>
>F
OK, I'm less familiar with his work. What would you recomme
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 05:24:49PM -0500, DJ Nikadeemas wrote:
> IMHO - It's a piece of crap recorded sometime between 1993-1995 that
> took him ages to finally release.
Hear, hear. Marc Acardipane is one of my favorite producers of all
time, but that record was a HUGE disappointment. The Mover is
IMHO - It's a piece of crap recorded sometime between 1993-1995 that took him
ages to finally release.
- Original Message -
From: "Cobert, Gwendal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:13:31 -0600
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: RE: (313) tresor me
y small file size (since *.wav are well compressed).
http://www.modplug.com
- KiDD*e*
- Original Message -
From: "Cobert, Gwendal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: (313) tresor meets apple
some of
org
> Subject: RE: (313) tresor meets apple
>
>
> I'm trying to offer the best spread between size and quality on my
> netlabels (www.rohformat.de, www.primative.net/schleudertrauma/ <
> shameless self promotion - GOTCHA! ;). That's actually vbr mp3's
>
>
>> Tresor still pushes boundaries it has to be admitted, towards
>
>> that thin line
>
>> between disturbing noise and music: E.g. that Mover -
>
>> 'Frontal Frustration'
>
>> LP.
>
>
>
>In what sense ? haven't even heard of that record
I'm sorry you haven't even heard of that record, but I
>The thing that worries me most about apple etc, they all try to punish
>the user to use their own software to play their native formats.
that's like having to buy Sony turntables to play a record made by Sony -
it's ridiculous but because of the world of digital they can make it
happen. It's
I'm trying to offer the best spread between size and quality on my
netlabels (www.rohformat.de, www.primative.net/schleudertrauma/ <
shameless self promotion - GOTCHA! ;). That's actually vbr mp3's
compressed with lame 3.90.3 codec using the --alt-preset standard
setting. Right now i'm almost alone
>so as there are a lot of independent label runners on this list who
>might be considering digital distribution what format do you think
>digital releases should be released in?
12", 10", or even 7" is good
;)
MEK
> Tresor still pushes boundaries it has to be admitted, towards
> that thin line
> between disturbing noise and music: E.g. that Mover -
> 'Frontal Frustration'
> LP.
In what sense ? haven't even heard of that record
Gwendal
And would this be the least, 'socially aceptable' (you know what I mean, I
hope) music which Apple has licensed?
I don't think anything non-electronic counts really.
Tresor still pushes boundaries it has to be admitted, towards that thin line
between disturbing noise and music: E.g. that Mover -
ent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:34 PM
-> > To: Dan Sicko; 313@hyperreal.org
-> > Subject: Re: (313) tresor meets apple
-> >
-> >
-> > did you get a press release or is checking the iTMS the first
-> > thing you do every tuesday as well? =)
-> >
-> >
there.
Thx for listening,
Ronny
> -Original Message-
> From: jonathan morse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:34 PM
> To: Dan Sicko; 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) tresor meets apple
>
>
> did you get a press release or is che
you got it. over coffee (not pepsi, I'm not that much of an Apple
shill). :P
-d
On Feb 10, 2004, at 8:34 AM, jonathan morse wrote:
checking the iTMS the first thing you do
every tuesday as well? =)
did you get a press release or is checking the iTMS the first thing you do
every tuesday as well? =)
it will be interesting to see what other labels and artists start
distributing through the service, and how long before they start to do so.
ive got my fingers crossed for perlon, playhouse and k
20 matches
Mail list logo
