From: Hugo Sweet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 (E-mail) 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:31 PM
Subject: [313] Art and Technology again
In my opinion, and based purely on the above, software such as EMI could
not
produce great techno because of the priority given to the
They are
good enough to fool experts (composers and professors of music)
Just a little corolary here - EMI fools pros much better in certain types of
emulation than it does in others. Interestingly, trained musicians can
usually spot EMI's Bach more often than, for example, EMI's Chopin. You
This didn't seem to go through the first time. Apologies if you get it
twice.
From: Hugo Sweet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 (E-mail) 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:31 PM
Subject: [313] Art and Technology again
In my opinion, and based purely on the above, software such as
Hugo sweet wrote:
Only in techno does it make sense for a composer to say that using a
preset synth sound is either succumbing to cliche or is creative
cowardice.
-
.. opposing that quote is the first thing I thought of when reading it.
I use presets ALOT but then
alter the sound down
