RE: [313] UR soldiers

2002-01-31 Thread alex.bond
"Jongsma, K.J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 31/01/2002 16:03:34 To: Alex Bond/UK/INF/PwC, 313@hyperreal.org cc: Subject: RE: [313] UR soldiers > Memo from Alex Bond: > > Going back to those questions; > > 'Why do UR call themselves soldiers?' > &g

Re: [313] UR soldiers

2002-01-31 Thread neontsetse
and 1 mo - > 'Why do UR call themselves soldiers?' > > Don't know, Is it part of a marketing ploy? > I always thought they trod a fine-line between truths and stories which > help their image. > > What do other people think?? What do they communicate with this ? Even if it would be inside of

Re: [313] UR soldiers

2002-01-31 Thread Otto
Alex Bond wrote: >Going back to those questions; > >'Why do UR call themselves soldiers?' > >Don't know, Is it part of a marketing ploy? >I always thought they trod a fine-line between truths and stories which >help their image. > >What do other people think?? In the words of Mike himself, when

Re: [313] UR soldiers

2002-01-31 Thread Stewart Caig
Why did Public Enemy called thier troops the Security of the first world and parade about on stage with uzis? Part publicity and part to visually enforce the politics that thier music embroiled itself in. UR talk about fighting the programmers by deprogramming the population through sonic assaults,

RE: [313] UR soldiers

2002-01-31 Thread Jongsma, K.J.
> Memo from Alex Bond: > > Going back to those questions; > > 'Why do UR call themselves soldiers?' > > Don't know, Is it part of a marketing ploy? > I always thought they trod a fine-line between truths and > stories which > help their image. > > What do other people think?? I dunno what o