Re: [313] Re: art vs. get rich quick scheme

2001-04-21 Thread paul
ROTECTED]>; 313 <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 5:48 AM Subject: [313] Re: art vs. get rich quick scheme > Whoa, this is a little out of hand, and quite off the mark... > > First off I suppose I should have made myself a bit clearer... I was more > referr

Re: art vs. get rich quick scheme

2001-04-21 Thread sb
Whoa, this is a little out of hand, and quite off the mark... First off I suppose I should have made myself a bit clearer... I was more referring to these guys DJ sets more than their tracks... They all tend to just bang away, and my personal preference, (not saying it's the only way, just the w

Re: [313] art vs. get rich quick scheme

2001-04-20 Thread george . jones
Ok. David Bitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/20/2001 01:37:25 PM To: <313@hyperreal.org> cc: Subject: [313] art vs. get rich quick scheme ok. First let me say that just because you don't personally understand or vibe with harder or experimental techno styles do

art vs. get rich quick scheme

2001-04-20 Thread David Bitterman
ok. First let me say that just because you don't personally understand or vibe with harder or experimental techno styles doesn't mean it's a "get rich quick" scheme. These artists have become quite adept at manipulating dance floor experiences, and by and large they are DJs. Nothing wrong with unde