RE: [313] fair play to juan atkins

2001-03-26 Thread Essenson Enar
: [313] fair play to juan atkins Hi, > I would think that anyone who knew enough to think > someone an "amazing dj" > due to the "flawless"ness of a mix would understand > what digitally mized means. I don't think so... > Isn't it all about the result

Re: [313] fair play to juan atkins

2001-03-26 Thread Nick Walsh
Hi, > I would think that anyone who knew enough to think > someone an "amazing dj" > due to the "flawless"ness of a mix would understand > what digitally mized means. I don't think so... > Isn't it all about the resulting product and it's > effect on the end-user, > anyways? Whether you mix v

Re: [313] fair play to juan atkins

2001-03-25 Thread Jeffrey Paul
At 08:10 AM 3/24/2001, beautiful individual wrote: therefore, ordinary joe soap on the street, who like that kind of music, thinks that seaman is an amazing dj, since, technically, his mix would be flawless. this is a misrepresentation of his talents. many of these mix cds state on the cover th

Re: [313] fair play to juan atkins

2001-03-24 Thread Stewart Fernandez
Yeah none of those trancey club minstry cream gatecrasher ibiza blah blah mixes are 'real' its been going on for years - Original Message - From: beautiful individual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 1:10 PM Subject: [313] fa

fair play to juan atkins

2001-03-24 Thread beautiful individual
y, his mix would be flawless. this is a misrepresentation of his talents. many of these mix cds state on the cover that they are digitally mixed, but how many consumers know what this actually means? so fair play to juan atkins, not afraid to show that he is fallable as dj (which we all are)