Steve - are you sending the SOAP requests to the HTTPS port on the web
server, or HTTP? We saw 4D server freezing on the SENDING server recently
when we were sending our SOAP requests over https. We're still in a
monitoring phase to ensure the problem is gone, but so far so good.
--
Sent from: h
Maybe I was not clear about the problem.
In R5 the clients can connect to the servers. The server with 19813 shows in
Available as expected, and connections with custom IPs to either sever work
just fine.
In R6 the clients cannot connect to the servers at all, nothing is in the
available tab a
I am not a very smart network guy, but if the R5 clients can connect to to the
R5 server:19815, wouldn’t the UDP port be open? Otherwise would not R5 have the
same problem that R6 is having. What am I not understanding here.
John
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 3:12 PM, Randy Engle via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@l
John,
Have you opened the UDP ports for 19815?
Randy Engle, Director
XC2 Software LLC – XC2LIVE!
I am trying to update a client running windows 2008 Server R2 Enterprise
Service Pack 1 to R6.
R5 works just fine, but in R6 clients cannot see the server. they are
connecting using custom addre
I am trying to update a client running windows 2008 Server R2 Enterprise
Service Pack 1 to R6.
R5 works just fine, but in R6 clients cannot see the server. they are
connecting using custom addresses as there are 2 servers listening on different
ports, 19815 and 19813. In R5 19813 showa up in a
The table must have a primary key field to be seen. The old table was created
before primary keys were used.
Keith - CDI
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 10:33 AM, Keith Culotta wrote:
>
> C_OBJECT($entAll)
> $entAll:=ds.Table_1.all()
>
> The code works in a new structure.
> It fails in a converted s
Tim,
Sorry, was in a conference call...Thanks!
Steve
*
Stephen J. Orth
The Aquila Group, Inc. Office: (608) 834-9213
P.O. Box 690 Mobile: (608) 347-6447
Sun Pra
Hi Steve,
> Let me know if you need more details as this particular customer is not happy.
I would like to work with you on this issue but I don't want to bombard
everyone's mailbox; so I will open a case for you on TAOW and work with you
there.
-Tim
Tim,
Sorry, forgot to respond to one of your statements...
Both applications, DMM Server and the middleware are both running as a service.
Steve
*
Stephen J. Orth
The Aquila Group, Inc. Offi
Tim,
Yes, we are using the local looback address. Here are some samples from the
log file being generated by the middleware service:
Example #1:
[08:31:03.05] Sending DMM WS Call: TTX-BRP;AUTO_BOOTH_2_OUTGOING;526
[08:31:03.07] Received WS Response: Success: Carrier=526;
[08:31:22.19] Sending
Hi Steve,
> Also, the two applications reside on the same box, meaning the DMM Server and
> the "middleware" application (running as a service) are on the same box.
If they are on the same box, are using a local loopback address like 127.0.0.1
or localhost, or are you using a real ip address or
Tim,
We have already been asking these questions, and they say there is nothing.
We have tried to use Wireshark before, but it collects so much information it
is overwhelming. Are there any suggestions on what events to trap on?
Also, the two applications reside on the same box, meaning the DM
Steve,
> For example, we receive a call, then 10 seconds later another call comes in
> and it's not received, then 10 seconds later another call comes in and it
> works fine. The other system that is trying to contact via web services
> records a log entry saying their request was forcibly ter
We are excited to present Q2Pix 1.0b1, the first public beta release of the
modern successor to QPix.
About Q2Pix
===
Q2Pix is the first of a new generation of 4D Extensions. We no longer call them
"plug-ins" because they are more than that. The architecture of these new
products comp
Has anyone done a REST interface with Avalera and 4D?
It looks easy enough but thought I’d ask to see if a component may already
exist...
Thanks,
Jeff.
**
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 1:26 PM, roofto...@mac.com wrote:
>
> I’ll run a test convert after hours on the production server and see if it
> completes without a problem. We do reboot our 4D app once per week.
> (Hold-over habits from past years of less stable 4D products.) You mentioned
> this ha
Thanks Jeffrey. Very helpful.
Our production server has 168 GB of RAM. Our app uses ~68 and another ~5 is
consumed by OS overhead etc. We generally run with ~95 GB of Ram free, so I
guess we’ll be okay…
I’ll run a test convert after hours on the production server and see if it
completes w
Another solution might be to convert to v15R4 first, which will do the required
reindexing but still use the old cache manager. Then convert to v16 so it
won't have to index.
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 12:49 PM, Jeffrey Kain wrote:
>
> Kirk,
>
> According to 4D, the problem is due to the new cac
Kirk,
According to 4D, the problem is due to the new cache design in v16. We've also
seen this on our servers that have a large amount of memory installed. We're
working with 4D on a solution to this. The problem, according to 4D, is that
the new cache manager allocates a lot of very small bloc
Hi All,
(OS-Windows Server 2012, 24 GB Ram, or 64GB Ram on second test machine)
We are moving a large (90GB) database from v15.2 to v16R5. When converting the
application the server eventually grinds to a halt, becomes non responsive, and
requires a reboot. I attempted this on two different m
AFAIK it is installed per default since Win XP, I'm sure that is installed in
Win 7 and Win 10 and of course in the matching server versions.
Regards
Lutz
> -Original Message-
> From: 4D_Tech [mailto:4d_tech-boun...@lists.4d.com] On Behalf Of Chip
> Scheide via
> 4D_Tech
> Sent: Thursda
C_OBJECT($entAll)
$entAll:=ds.Table_1.all()
The code works in a new structure.
It fails in a converted structure with the error "Unknown Member Function".
Compatibility: "Use object notation..." is checked.
"Expose with 4D Mobile Service" is checked for the Table and Fields.
The database was re
Thanks!
I did find the file,
however, the Finder was not finding the file, I do not know why...
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:01:13 +0200, Koen Van Hooreweghe wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> The User Constants.xlf file is located inside your database package
> in the Resources folder.
> You can indeed move this
I will investigate further, but as I understand:
Robocopy is an EXTERNAL dos command, and as such is not (or may not) be
installed on some/all Windows systems.
xCopy is part of command.com, and as such exists on all windows systems
(at least all that would be in use today).
Chip
On Wed, 11 Apr
Thanks,
I figured out the HTML encoding based on something I entered through
the 4DPop constants editor.
For Cr, Lf, CrLf, and Tab there appears to be no way to add these
values through 4DPop constants editor, which is why I was looking for a
work around, and why I posted this info.
On Wed, 11
overloading requires the concept of inheritance based on class.
although it was confirmed during the Summit that the feature is under
development,
I would urge you to spend a moment to check out immediately
collection methods that accept a "callback" project method.
http://doc.4d.com/4Dv17/4D/17/
it depends on what you mean by efficient; fewer 4D code does not necessarily
mean better performance, it all depends on the internal implementation (xerces).
if you don't know already there is this
> $dom:=DOM Create XML Ref("root")
> $e:=DOM Create XML element($dom;"root/element[10]") //10 ch
[JPR]
Hi All,
In fact, it seems that it has been a little misunderstanding in this case of
XML Structure. What LR was talking about is the NEW way which has been
demonstrated by Laurent Esnault during the Summit.
With the new way of handling the 4DB (usually named 'the structure'), it will
be
Hi Chip,
The User Constants.xlf file is located inside your database package in the
Resources folder.
You can indeed move this file to other databases, just like any other
‘Resources' file. Translation xlf files inside language (.lproj) directories or
images.
HTH
Koen
> Op 11 apr. 2018, om 19
I second this recommendation. Robocopy is far better and more flexible than
xcopy.
But the problem with escaping of paths remains the same.
Regards
Lutz
> -Original Message-
> From: 4D_Tech [mailto:4d_tech-boun...@lists.4d.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth
> Geiger
> via 4D_Tech
> Sent: Wednesd
30 matches
Mail list logo