Gustin Johnson wrote:
I don't think so. Why do you think SUID needs to be set? Setting SUID
is a very bad thing, even if you think you need it.
To chose by click between 'Ondemand' and 'Performance' for a user
session by using the GNOME panel applet 'CPU Frequency Scaling Monitor'
seems
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Gustin Johnson wrote:
I don't think so. Why do you think SUID needs to be set? Setting SUID
is a very bad thing, even if you think you need it.
To chose by click between 'Ondemand' and 'Performance' for a user
session by using the GNOME panel applet 'CPU Frequency
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Robin Gareus wrote:
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Gustin Johnson wrote:
I don't think so. Why do you think SUID needs to be set? Setting SUID
is a very bad thing, even if you think you need it.
To chose by click between 'Ondemand' and 'Performance' for a user
Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 14:09 +0200 schrieb Robin Gareus:
I never switch these anyway. Just using 'ondemand' is sufficient. It's
got the best powersaving and no impact on performance (at least not on
Intel CPUs).
We discussed that issue on the 64studio-list several time ago and (I
guess it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Jarosch wrote:
Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
There might be a better way to do it.
There will be a better way to do it: Later versions (but certainly not
that of 8.04) of the Frequency Scaling Monitor
Gustin Johnson wrote:
I did not know that AMD could do this, perhaps they got something right with
AM2 after all.
I never monitored that my AM2 Athlon does or does not an independent
control of the frequency scaling for each core, it seems to be, that it
doesn't do it.
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Gustin Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Jarosch wrote:
Am Montag, den 29.06.2009, 08:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
There might be a better way to do it.
There will be a better way to do it: Later versions (but
Gustin Johnson wrote:
AppArmor and a firewall are redundant? The phrase defense in depth is
not just a sales term, every level needs to be protected. Microsoft
understands this as well, perhaps better than most.
If AppArmor and a Firewall are needed, than I can't understand that they
are
Robin Gareus wrote:
I'm not sure if /etc/hdparm.conf accepts wildcards, but I'd hazard a
guess that
/dev/discs/disc*/disc {
spindown_time = 240
}
may be a good default for 64studio.
No, I don't want the disk drive that I'm using is being turned off, even
if I won't use it four
How can this be done for the panel applet?
apt-get install gksu-polkit
The idea to set SUID results from the fact, that there is no PolicyKit
for Hardy. SUID is made for such cases. The probable security risk for a
multi user system is, that some user could harm the system, but it's
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
How can this be done for the panel applet?
apt-get install gksu-polkit
The idea to set SUID results from the fact, that there is no PolicyKit
for Hardy. SUID is made for such cases. The probable security risk for a
multi user system is, that some
11 matches
Mail list logo
