Gustin Johnson wrote: > AppArmor and a firewall are redundant? The phrase "defense in depth" is > not just a sales term, every level needs to be protected. Microsoft > understands this as well, perhaps better than most.
If AppArmor and a Firewall are needed, than I can't understand that they are not default for 64 Studio. For Suse they are defaults. Some people have special locks on their doors, other never go out without a Teaser. Many people are insured, some are not. I guess the need for this depends to the individual situation. > Consider that most compromised machines have a > heavier load than if they were not compromised, so they are using more > energy. If the machine is compromised you will notice this for a DAW, because of the load. I guess compromised machines are those machines, from people, that have too much resources for their machine, they never will need the resources, but a rootkit can run because of this. _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list 64studio-users@lists.64studio.com http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
