Hello Tengfei:
The draft is meant to express exactly what your reasonable case shows.
There is an example of that in appendix.
What exactly did I write improperly that it can be understood otherwise?
Take care ;
Pascal
From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tengfei Chang
Sent:
Nice to hear that's what you intended to do!
In the beginning of section 4.3:
...
Once the address of the source of the packet is determined, it
becomes the reference for the compression of the addresses that are
located in compressed RH3 headers that are present inside the IP-in-
I see, and yes, that is misleading.
I need to change that to say the reference to the first is the source of the
packet and then the reference for each entry is the previous one when
uncompressed (not the first as you suggest but, the one just before it).
So you uncompress an address and it
Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> I need to change that to say the reference to the first is the source of
the
> packet and then the reference for each entry is the previous one when
> uncompressed (not the first as you suggest but, the one just before
>
Yes, what I mean this:
I need to change that to say the reference to the first is the source of the
> packet and then the reference for each entry is the previous one when
> uncompressed (not the first as you suggest but, the one just before
> it).
which you are going to say on the
Does this work then (I added just a few words in between)?
"
With this specification, the Compression Reference for the first
address found in an RH3 header is the source of the IPv6 packet, and
then the reference for each subsequent entry is the address of its
predecessor once it is
Thanks a lot Pat!
Pascal
From: Pat Kinney [mailto:patrickin...@gmail.com]
Sent: mardi 26 janvier 2016 19:27
To: 6tisch@ietf.org
Cc: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Minutes, 22 January 2016 interim, 6TiSCH WG
Hi;
Sorry I missed the call due to being at the