On the side, MaliĊĦa
With RFC 8505, we are now claiming that the scope of uniqueness for a Link
Local address is the pair of peers.
So the flow that you represent as
| | |
|<-Neighbor Discovery (2)->| |
Thank you, Pascal.
> Please let me know if you intend to provide a review soon.
Yes. Here are my additional but minor comments:
---
[Definition of 6P / Section 2.2 and Figure 1]
In the terminology section, 6top is explained as follows:
6top (6TiSCH Operation Sublayer): The next highest
Hello Yatch:
I'm still fixing the text from the WGLC comments so I'm happy to still pick
some. Please let me know if you intend to provide a review soon.
To your point: this is an architecture document. I'm not too anxious that all
the components are not fully implemented yet.
Maybe we'll work
Hi Pascal,
I'm reviewing the architecture draft, although the deadline has already
passed... I have one comment.
I see some ideas which don't have concrete protocol specifications discussed as
WG drafts, for instance, centralized reservation and tracks. They look like
kind of "concepts" at
