The motherboard in my main server went belly-up yesterday. No POST, no
nothing. Well, the fans spin. Joy.
That particular motherboard isn't carried anywhere any more, despite
being a whopping one year old. I'm looking for a replacement, but
having a hard time finding one with both a supported SATA
perhaps more particularly, anyone know of or working on support for
the RealTek RTL8111/8168B ethernet controller? I've found two boards
with match except for having an 8111 controller, which we don't list
as supported. i have no idea how close realtek's parts are to each
other.
On Wed Dec 17 13:10:41 EST 2008, ano...@gmail.com wrote:
> perhaps more particularly, anyone know of or working on support for
> the RealTek RTL8111/8168B ethernet controller? I've found two boards
> with match except for having an 8111 controller, which we don't list
> as supported. i have no idea
On Wed Dec 17 13:00:49 EST 2008, ano...@gmail.com wrote:
> The motherboard in my main server went belly-up yesterday. No POST, no
> nothing. Well, the fans spin. Joy.
>
> That particular motherboard isn't carried anywhere any more, despite
> being a whopping one year old. I'm looking for a replace
does "sb600 or greater" really mean just by number? sb700 and sb750
seem common, but i'd assumed (probably foolishly) that 6xx was
different (enough) from 7xx.
On Wed Dec 17 14:23:23 EST 2008, ano...@gmail.com wrote:
> does "sb600 or greater" really mean just by number? sb700 and sb750
> seem common, but i'd assumed (probably foolishly) that 6xx was
> different (enough) from 7xx.
yes. i don't know of many significant changes between
sb600 and sb750. am
>
> That's scary. Can you send the output of "gcc -v"?
>
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2/work/gcc-4.3.2/
configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/
4.3.2 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.
Devtrace is ready for your consumption, hot out of the
oven and juicy fresh. The source is at
/n/sources/contrib/john/devtrace-backport.tgz
which includes all the necessary source files, the man
page (troff), and instructions for putting it in the
kernel and compiling.
Remember, this isn't mine al
Does it work now with non-amd64 kernels?
Peace
uriel
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:36 PM, wrote:
> Devtrace is ready for your consumption, hot out of the
> oven and juicy fresh. The source is at
> /n/sources/contrib/john/devtrace-backport.tgz
> which includes all the necessary source files, the ma
This source is backported to the PC kernel in /sys/src/9/pc.
The instructions make this abundantly clear, what with all
the stuff being done in /sys/src/9/pc.
John
> Does it work now with non-amd64 kernels?
>
> Peace
>
> uriel
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:36 PM, wrote:
>> Devtrace is ready
Didn't know the amd64 kernel doesn't live in /sys/src/9/pc/.
Sorry, I should have guessed that
/sys/src/9/not-for-the-unworthy-unwashed-masses/ was much more likely
location.
Peace
uriel
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:55 PM, wrote:
> This source is backported to the PC kernel in /sys/src/9/pc.
>
Hi All,
the ape/pwd.h has the following
(in short pw_passwd missing, is this something unwanted ?)
struct passwd {
char*pw_name;
uid_t pw_uid;
gid_t pw_gid;
char*pw_dir;
char*pw_shell;
};
Linux has:
struct passwd
{
char *pw_name;
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Uriel wrote:
> Didn't know the amd64 kernel doesn't live in /sys/src/9/pc/.
OK, I am only responding to this because of the incorrect impressions
being left by these kinds of comments.
The backport John did is to the standard kernel that you all can get
on your
Pietro Gagliardi escribió:
Given
extern "C"{
#include <9p.h> // or whatever you do
}
you can link 9p into a C++ program easily.
Yes!
If I use the extern "C" it compiles :'-)
Using "extern function" is not valid for linking C and C++
Sorry Pietro, sqweek. Thanks a lot.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:07 PM, ron minnich wrote:
>
> "The Masses are Revolting!"
>
"You said it! They stink on ice!"
-History of the World, Part I.
Excerpts from Sebastian Arvidsson Liem's message of Fri Dec 05 12:40:49 -0800
2008:
> Hi,
>
> I've got my hands on a Intel Atom D945GCLF [1] board and I'm trying
> to install Plan 9 on it. It's my first time so please be gentle. ;D
>
> I'm using the Dec 5 2008 iso and it hangs on the following:
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:07 PM, ron minnich wrote:
>
> "The Masses are Revolting!"
>
"You said it! They stink on ice!"
-History of the World, Part I.
--- End Message ---
For no reason that I can see I am now getting this message via a dialogue box:
Packagekit Error
Failed to reset get-updates
Then a little box I can tick for more data.
Here's where it really gets good:
A security policy in place prevents this sender from sending this
message to this recipient, se
D-bus, a disgrace that should never have even been invented, if 9P on
linux had not been dead-on-arrival.
uriel
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:28 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> For no reason that I can see I am now getting this message via a dialogue box:
> Packagekit Error
> Failed to reset get-updates
> D-bus, a disgrace that should never have even been invented, if 9P on
> linux had not been dead-on-arrival.
"if you want Plan 9 you know where to find it" I heard them say.
Hello,
I've started to get spam this week, seems that, or this has been applied to
9grid.es
"Caution: If your usage should exceed the free use criteria your access to
Spamhaus's public DNSBL servers is very likely to be cut off without warning."
or they are missing some "well-known" sources
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:39 PM, andrey mirtchovski
wrote:
>> D-bus, a disgrace that should never have even been invented, if 9P on
>> linux had not been dead-on-arrival.
>
> "if you want Plan 9 you know where to find it" I heard them say.
If that is what they said, that displays their usual ign
Ron,
probably is something like this:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/fedora-35/fedora-core-9-update-dbus.exception-and-dbus.proxies-and-dbus.error.accessdenied-errors-689207/
Saludos.
ron minnich escribió:
For no reason that I can see I am now getting this message via a dialogue box:
2008/12/17 ron minnich :
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Uriel wrote:
>> Didn't know the amd64 kernel doesn't live in /sys/src/9/pc/.
>
> OK, I am only responding to this because of the incorrect impressions
> being left by these kinds of comments.
>
> The backport John did is to the standard
Hey guys,
Back in my ``let's have fun with Plan 9'' yearly phase.
Here I come back and I see some really cool work. 9vx definitely is
the coolest thing I've seen so far, and devtrace looks pretty nifty
too. What's really cool to me about them is that they're available and
there is open work to be
so here's a potentially interesting idea. Since you are running plan 9
under Linux with 9vx, consider using the TAU toolkit to measure it.
http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/research/tau/home.php
we've used these tools to optmize an MPI library and they are quite powerful.
See what you think.
ron
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> * Porting devtrace. Needs some changes to compile with gas; the
> #pragmas are useless, but I think should work after a little more
> tweaking.
note that those pragmas are the tip of the iceberg.
gcc inserts the profiling code; on Plan 9,
On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:33 PM, ron minnich wrote:
so here's a potentially interesting idea. Since you are running plan 9
under Linux with 9vx, consider using the TAU toolkit to measure it.
http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/research/tau/home.php
we've used these tools to optmize an MPI library and they ar
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> In fact, Ron, now that you've mentioned it -- I'm going to try the PerfAn
> on 9vx myself ;-) And here's the question for you: how representative
> the behavior of 9vx is supposed to be of the regular Plan9 kernel?
I don't know but the c
On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
* Automatic provisioning via a web browser. Yeah, Plan 9 in the web
browser (if you have Java, I guess -- otherwise it's just VNC).
http://testbed.dh0.us/ -- this code isn't version controlled, but I
could probably put it in hg with little effor
Well apparently plan9 runs on alpha, but I can not get plan9 to run on my
DS10L. Can anyone help?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Nolan Hamilton
wrote:
> Well apparently plan9 runs on alpha, but I can not get plan9 to run on my
> DS10L. Can anyone help?
>
I can help the DS10L.
1. open window
2. look out, make sure no one is in the areas
3. slide DS10L out window
now that was easy!
Of cou
> I recently put together a similar system but using the 945GCLF2 motherboard
> [1]. I also got similar qlock errors. I noticed that the kernel detected the
> ethernet card twice and so I decided to try disabling the ethernet interface
> in the BIOS. The system booted fine after that. I did have
2008/12/17 Roman Shaposhnik :
> On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
>>
>> * Automatic provisioning via a web browser. Yeah, Plan 9 in the web
>> browser (if you have Java, I guess -- otherwise it's just VNC).
>> http://testbed.dh0.us/ -- this code isn't version controlled, but I
>>
> I would if it was free and I didn't have a server :\
and more reliable than street power.
- erik
This is from the TUHS list. I thought it might be of interest here, too.
> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:05:30 +1000
> From: Warren Toomey
> To: t...@tuhs.org
> Subject: [TUHS] Old UNIX Filesystems with FUSE
>
> http://osxbook.com/software/ancientfs/
>
> Amit Singh has added support for a whole bunch
> In fact, one could actually look at what John released
> *before* posting to this list and making oneself look silly. It's an
> idea.
Uriel is renowned for demanding tools to be released on principle,
without him having any practical need for them. He lands up sounding
like a peevish, ungratefu
> I can help the DS10L.
>
> 1. open window
> 2. look out, make sure no one is in the areas
> 3. slide DS10L out window
Sure, but how do you "keep Plan 9 honest" if no one checks
portability?
In fact, it's already very hard to find porting opportunities for Plan
9, regretfully. An example I rais
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:12 AM, wrote:
>> I can help the DS10L.
>>
>> 1. open window
>> 2. look out, make sure no one is in the areas
>> 3. slide DS10L out window
>
> Sure, but how do you "keep Plan 9 honest" if no one checks
> portability?
Don't worry. The holy keepers of the amd64 kernel do t
Yea, stupid retarded moron I am to give a fuck about the welfare of
Plan 9 and its future.
After all, I have only invested I don't know how many hundreds of
hours of my life in it...
uriel
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:52 AM, wrote:
>> In fact, one could actually look at what John released
>> *bef
>> In fact, one could actually look at what John released
>> *before* posting to this list and making oneself look silly. It's an
>> idea.
>
> Uriel is renowned for demanding tools to be released on principle,
> without him having any practical need for them. He lands up sounding
> like a peevish
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:55:50PM -0500, j...@csplan9.rit.edu wrote:
> It would be a bit of work but definitely feasible if there's interest.
+1
pgpTOmxdMaiBS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:55:50PM -0500, j...@csplan9.rit.edu wrote:
>> It would be a bit of work but definitely feasible if there's interest.
>
> +1
I presume by this that you were able to get devtrace working? Did you
find the documentation sufficiently clear? Any problems?
John
No, '+1' means that he agrees and supports the quoted statement.
uriel
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:04 AM, wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:55:50PM -0500, j...@csplan9.rit.edu wrote:
>>> It would be a bit of work but definitely feasible if there's interest.
>>
>> +1
>
> I presume by this that
> Didn't Plan 9 have a way to mount 6th and 7th edition disk images also?
> Was that ever released?
tapefs(4)
I really am getting to the deep guts of dev.c and chan.c here in
debugging why when ip/ipconfig tries to open /net/ether0/clone, it's
getting Enotfound. From my latest commit:
Fix some stuff with the ether controller attaching. It attaches now, but for
some reason clone screws up. I have no idea w
> Because we unworthy dirty masses should not bother with what we are
> not supposed to be interested in.
This is getting tedious. Have you considered psychotherapy for your
paranoia?
And what exactly is it that is being denied to you and you deem to be
your undeniable right?
++L
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:55:50PM -0500, j...@csplan9.rit.edu wrote:
>> It would be a bit of work but definitely feasible if there's interest.
>
> +1
Out of scope in my case, but the logistics interest me greatly.
Please keep me in the loop.
++L
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Pietro Gagliardi escribió:
>> extern "C"{
>> #include <9p.h> // or whatever you do
>> }
>>
>> you can link 9p into a C++ program easily.
>
> If I use the extern "C" it compiles :'-)
>
> Using "extern function" is not valid for linking C
49 matches
Mail list logo
