maybe it is time to try to pack-port some of Erik's stuff to the canonical
source.
I fully agree.
Pavel
The update to 10.04 has overloaded my email with messages from ubuntu's dosemu
forum. Basically the same issue as with 9vx. A fix [sic] is suggested. So,
question is:
On Sat, 1 May 2010 23:36:08 +0200
Mathieu Lonjaret mathieu.lonja...@gmail.com wrote:
Fwiw, 9vx does build and run fine on
Not that I know of. it's a lucid lynx install I did when it was still
in beta and I haven't kept it up to date since then, so maybe that's
where the difference lies.
How do I check if that fix you're speaking of is installed or not?
Cheers,
Mathieu
---BeginMessage---
The update to 10.04 has
The more interesting question is: who doesn't agree, and why?
On 5/4/10, Pavel Klinkovsky pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe it is time to try to pack-port some of Erik's stuff to the canonical
source.
I fully agree.
Pavel
On Tue, 4 May 2010 11:06:29 +0200
Mathieu Lonjaret mathieu.lonja...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I know of. it's a lucid lynx install I did when it was still
in beta and I haven't kept it up to date since then, so maybe that's
where the difference lies.
How do I check if that fix you're
On 3 May 2010, at 19:34, Jorden M wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:53 AM, erik quanstrom
quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
It's always been easier for me to use python's/perl's regular
expressions when I needed to process a text file than to use
plan9's.
For simple things, e.g. while editing
On 3 May 2010, at 20:13, erik quanstrom wrote:
trying to figure out how to view html pages but no sucess.
I use htmlfmt(1), you can do the same until somebody explains how
to
use abaco(1) instead. Neither will do tables.
false. abaco does tables correctly. see readweb(1) for
details
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fmwrote:
On 3 May 2010, at 19:34, Jorden M wrote:
I've yet to find out why this happens so much, but I think I can
narrow it to a combination of ignorance, laziness, and perhaps that
all-too-frequent assumption `oh, I can
maybe it is time to try to pack-port some of Erik's stuff to the canonical
source.
I fully agree.
The more interesting question is: who doesn't agree, and why?
and the most important question -- who's going to work on it.
EBo --
cd /sys/man; mk indices
ty but mk fails with:
mkindex: '/bin/mkindex' file does not exist
is your path not (. /bin)?
- erik
On Tue May 4 04:54:36 EDT 2010, pavlovet...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 1, 4:28 pm, quans...@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom) wrote:
http://iwp9.org/iwp94e.pdf
- erik
The front page is beautiful.
ian ennis (coraid) put together the front cover,
and of course the rabbit is reneé french's
If this is true you must be quite a few steps ahead of us all.
On 5/4/10, EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
maybe it is time to try to pack-port some of Erik's stuff to the
canonical
source.
I fully agree.
The more interesting question is: who doesn't agree, and why?
and the most important
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:16:36PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
if i had to guess, i'd imagine that the problem is in talking
to the eeprom. do you have any additional information on
the chip you have? for example, pci output or
output from /dev/kmesg on boot? pngs are fine.
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 04:09:53PM -0600, EBo wrote:
The article Styx Caching via Journal Callbacks is listed with the author
order as N.W. Filardo and V. Srinivas whereas the article order and table
of contents list them in the reverse order.
Venkatesh should be first author on that paper.
Nathaniel W Filardo n...@cs.jhu.edu said:
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 04:09:53PM -0600, EBo wrote:
The article Styx Caching via Journal Callbacks is listed with the author
order as N.W. Filardo and V. Srinivas whereas the article order and table
of contents list them in the reverse order.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 3 May 2010, at 19:34, Jorden M wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:53 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
It's always been easier for me to use python's/perl's regular
expressions when I needed to
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM, David du Colombier 0in...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it mean IL has performance issue on long-distance networks?
As I understand it, the real problem is that Internet
doesn't handle IL well.
They are
Hello
(about students/trainees and perl)
Being able to recognize what you've studied in your daily work is quite
difficult in most places. Also your work objectives are rarely related to the
correctness, in the sense of science. I mean something correct or well enough
for the business could
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jorden M jrm8...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone experiment with using sliding windows in IL? Could help.
The question I have, based on probably not enough knowledge: how much
of what IL was intended to do is remedied by IPV6? One thing I recall
is that a big problem
well, the interface churn rule for Linux continues to apply.
My lguest port won't work on newer kernels. To try to keep up, I've
created this project:
http://bitbucket.org/rminnich/9lguest/
And hope to have an up-to-date 9lguest ready today or tomorrow once I
squash some more issues.
I'll try
cd /sys/man; mk indices
ty but mk fails with:
mkindex: '/bin/mkindex' file does not exist
Works here on native plan9.
perhaps you are using 9vx? This installs only
a subset of the plan9 distribution initially.
-Steve
The question I have, based on probably not enough knowledge: how much
of what IL was intended to do is remedied by IPV6? One thing I recall
is that a big problem with v4 was that it did not preserve record
boundaries, which seems won't be an issue in v6. What else did IL
remedy, and how much
My impression as an undergraduate in CS was that most of my peers were
mechanics, rather than artists. They could ape things, but only few
could see past what was shown and apply the principles abstractly.
This may have to do with failure in the earlier education--I remember
that again, peers
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:16 AM, erik quanstrom
quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote:
i believe that it is tcp that doesn't preserve record boundaries, not
ip.
Let me rephrase. My understanding is that tcp on v6 preserves record
boundaries. Is that wrong?
perhaps you mean sctcp? i don't
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:48:32AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
looks like you may have an unsupported phy. there seem
to be many options. (internal vs. external, etc.) if that's
the case, neither ethersis or ether83815 support the phy you've
got.
That would suck.
otoh, according to
TCP doesn't preserve message boundaries.
The pre-9P2000 kernels relied on having a transport
protocol that preserved message boundaries in order
to work one 9P packet at a time with ordinary read calls.
You could work around it by pushing an fcall stream module
to reinsert the boundaries on TCP,
I am thinking of the durability of the URL:s for the
various IWP9 articles. if www.iwp9.org will be reused
for further hosting, a subdirectory (as in 'papers/4e/')
might be a good idea.I suppose that some domain bloat
is hard to avoid, when things are so decentralised ;-)
/jonas
Here is a
So it doesn't matter anymore. The fix was in the 9P
implementations, not IPv6.
it doesn't matter anymore for 9p. but rx is still broken over tcp.
- erik
otoh, according to /lib/oui (and if I remember what you said before
correctly),
the ethernet address is 00e006 (00e006 silicon integrated sys. corp.). iirc,
ea is supposed to be in the form 112233445566, so would I have in plan9.ini
ea=ee66
?
/lib/oui is a list of prefixes.
well, I have a version working, in the sense that there is less
corruption than before on output :-)
Anyone is welcome to take a look. Hey, you can even point out what I
did wrong :-)
http://bitbucket.org/rminnich/9lguest/
ron
OK, lguest support is back and working. and commited.
Console I/O is a tad more efficient. Since we're using this port for
the HARE project I expect we'll continue to clean it up, so if anyone
wants anything let me know.
ron
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:23 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
The more interesting question is: who doesn't agree, and why?
On 5/4/10, Pavel Klinkovsky pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe it is time to try to pack-port some of Erik's stuff to the canonical
source.
I fully agree.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:57 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:23 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
The more interesting question is: who doesn't agree, and why?
On 5/4/10, Pavel Klinkovsky pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe it is time to try to
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com said:
On Tue May 4 16:05:13 EDT 2010, jonas.amo...@home.se wrote:
I am thinking of the durability of the URL:s for the
various IWP9 articles. if www.iwp9.org will be reused
for further hosting, a subdirectory (as in 'papers/4e/')
might be a good
Hi all
Ever since I read about ken thompson comment on genetic biology. I
started reading bits and pieces about it in various diygroups.
You guys are the only computer science operating systems research type
people I know, so I thought you guys might enjoy this.
would be Quanstrom2009a.pdf Quanstrom2009b.pdf or possibly something like
Quanstrom2009AAN.pdf Quanstrom2009SR.pdf This would help with various
maintenance and automation tasks.
i'm not sure i understand how this would help. currently
there is a single list of paper names. for your use,
i'm not sure i understand how this would help. currently
there is a single list of paper names. for your use, these
names are random. changing to a list of authors,
years and a seperate sequence list per author sounds at best
no less complicated to me. for your use, i believe such a
A correspondent recently sent me email to ask
about where to find a good 3-button mouse for
use with plan9port, but the question might equally
apply to Plan 9 proper. I was disappointed to find
that apparently IBM/Lenovo no longer sells the mouse
that Andrey first alerted us to, with the big blue
On 05/04/2010 11:18 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
A correspondent recently sent me email to ask
about where to find a good 3-button mouse for
use with plan9port, but the question might equally
apply to Plan 9 proper. I was disappointed to find
that apparently IBM/Lenovo no longer sells the mouse
that
I've been buying IBM- or HP-branded mice such as
http://www.amazon.com/3-Button-Optical-USB-Mouse-black/dp/B000FLUSEM
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:26 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote:
you have something in your path by the
name of sed, sort, echo, sed which are
executable but not $objtype binaries.
$path is . /bin
where . is /sys/man
the are no sed, sort, or echo in .
the ones residing in /bin
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:26 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com
wrote:
you have something in your path by the
name of sed, sort, echo, sed which are
executable but not $objtype binaries.
$path is . /bin
where . is /sys/man
the are no sed, sort, or echo in .
the ones
On Tue May 4 23:22:19 EDT 2010, r...@swtch.com wrote:
A correspondent recently sent me email to ask
about where to find a good 3-button mouse for
use with plan9port, but the question might equally
apply to Plan 9 proper. I was disappointed to find
that apparently IBM/Lenovo no longer sells
Sun Microsystems USB 3-button mouse has always been my preferred mouse
for Plan 9. Still is. And they're cheap.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:52 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
On Tue May 4 23:22:19 EDT 2010, r...@swtch.com wrote:
A correspondent recently sent me email to ask
about
Trackballs Kensington has a nice 4 button one with a scroll ring that
I've been very very happy with.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Don Bailey don.bai...@gmail.com wrote:
Sun Microsystems USB 3-button mouse has always been my preferred mouse
for Plan 9. Still is. And they're cheap.
On
There is no better supplier of true
3-button mice than Uriel.
I use his Logitech 3-button mouse.
Best,
ak
P.S.: Considering air fare, I think there
is a fair bit of price inflation going on
here. Definitely not a bargain.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote:
...
Are
is lguest the winning linux kernel technology of it's category today?
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:20 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, lguest support is back and working. and commited.
Console I/O is a tad more efficient. Since we're using this port for
the HARE project I expect
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:58 AM, David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com wrote:
is lguest the winning linux kernel technology of it's category today?
It really depends on what you want. For us, and what we need, lguest wins.
See this paper to see why.
48 matches
Mail list logo
