* Jens Staal wrote:
> Personally, I believe that a Plan9 target for a cross compiler might
> be more interesting. GCC already added support for the Plan9 dialect
> of C. If it also could be made to compile Plan9 binaries, it could be
> used for an alternative self-hosting distro as the one you en
* Charles Forsyth wrote:
> >waserror() depends on callee-save.
>
> caller-save, and a few other conventions (or rather, no need for more
> conventions).
> specifically, it's enough to save the pc and stack. all variables will
> have the right values on non-zero return from setjmp, regardless of
> * Charles Forsyth wrote:
> > >waserror() depends on callee-save.
> >
> > caller-save, and a few other conventions (or rather, no need for more
> > conventions).
> > specifically, it's enough to save the pc and stack. all variables will
> > have the right values on non-zero return from setjmp,
* Lucio De Re wrote:
Hi,
> If the cloud were to be a mere repository of (encrypted) Venti blocks,
> wouldn't it be a very useful tool?
Actually, I already had been doing some works in that area.
Not actually venti, but a some bit similar object store,
which supports some kind of distribute gc,
