> You see, James, what you are suggesting is as useful as abc2midi...
abc2midi is very useful.
--
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Campin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] requesting goodies from developers
> Gianni Cunich wrote:
>
> [Gianni, please don't quote an entire message when replying; you quoted
>
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] dynamics (was)
> But "silly" is not the main point. I lost my temper, yes. For the second
> time since this list was started. I am s
- Original Message -
From: "James Allwright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] dynamics (was)
James allwright wrote:
> I don't think you'll ever get the standards committee to speak as
one> person with a u
- Original Message -
From: "Forgeot Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:59 PM
Subject: [abcusers] RE : The day the music died! & voting for abc standard
> Yes, I think it's quite boring to read all those endless quarrels
> about the stan
The trouble with propositions of this kind is that they tend to
come from users who have experience with a very limited number
of programs and usually on only one platform. What is being
proposed here is that we all use abcm2ps syntax (plus a few
enhancements) and abandon all other approaches.
T
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> John is talking a lot of sense but still seems slightly ambiguous
> about whether the documentation should be associated with one software
> development or not.
By way of analogy: The HTML specification is different from the Amaya web
browser docume
James Allwright wrote:
>
> On Thu 01 Nov 2001 at 04:59PM +0100, Forgeot Eric wrote:
> >
> > Sharps, flats and natural signs may be indicated in guitar chords
> > using '\#', '\b' and '\='.
> >
>
> Sharps and flats are already indicated in guitar chords with # and b !
So let's just add the '='
> "James" == James Allwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> On Thu 01 Nov 2001 at 04:59PM +0100, Forgeot Eric wrote:
>>
>> Sharps, flats and natural signs may be indicated in guitar chords
>> using '\#', '\b' and '\='.
>>
James> Sharps and flats are already indi
On Thu 01 Nov 2001 at 04:59PM +0100, Forgeot Eric wrote:
>
> Sharps, flats and natural signs may be indicated in guitar chords
> using '\#', '\b' and '\='.
>
Sharps and flats are already indicated in guitar chords with # and b !
James Allwright
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
Yes, I think it's quite boring to read all those endless quarrels
about the standardization of a musical format I found already
rather perfect : if it becomes too complicated, then there is not
point using it instead of midi : I like ABC because it's easy and
compact, and use a real midi sequencer
>I suppose nobody at abcusers ever tastes anything with alcohol in
it.
No I don't, except in cakes or pancakes now. I became sober after
having tasted in Norway "hjemmelaget whiskey" [homemade whiskey, a
really horrible thing for health]... :)
Speaking on Scandinavia, I'm trying to transcribe so
(Probably the best subject line yet.)
John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said -
>Why couldn't non-specificity simply be included as one of the project's
>requirements?
>
>Here's more what I have in mind... Picture your ideal standardization
>committee/forum/whatever, and now simply imagine that same thing
Wendy Galovich said-
>A Wiki page? See http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WhatIsaWiki
>
>What I'm thinking here is that if an editable page - say, a table listing abc
>applications against each detail of the standard specifications, was publicly
>available, a sizeable group of contributors co
James Allwright wrote:
>This explanation of octave= is not quite right. I suggest the re-wording
>
>Yaps and abc2midi support a simpler version of this, where the directive
>octave=-2 causes every note to be treated as having a pitch two octaves
>below the written pitch.
>
>The point being that
Richard Robinson said -
>On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> .. Richard Robinson and others
>> have argued that the development of the abc standard should be
>> associated with a software project.
>
>I have reviewed all my postings to this thread, sin
On Wed 31 Oct 2001 at 04:28PM +, Phil Taylor wrote:
> James Allwright wrote:
>
> >It is still possible for someone who cares about an abc standard
> >to help the process along; get hold of every abc program you can,
> >go through them carefully and then document the compatibilities
> >and inc
17 matches
Mail list logo