Jack Campin said -
>Programs like abc2win only let you output ABC they can interpret.
abc2win has come under considerable critiscism on this list for its deviations from the standard. After not inconsiderable effort on my part, abc2nwc now accepts abc2win tunes without much trouble. This was es
-
From: Frank Nordberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] dynamics (again)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am not a Mac user so I have no direct experience of the nature of
> BarFly, but I do know that a n
Funny how a thread subject can drift so far from the original and yet still remain appropriate.
Frank Nordberg said -
>BarFly follows the standard (ABC 1.6) pretty well, but all abc
>applications differs when it comes to various extensions.
Yes, I think it does. (If it's only a text editor w
>> BarFly doesn't *have* output; it's a text editor, it doesn't enforce
>> any ABC dialect any more than Emacs does.
> Don't text editors have output?
> I am not a Mac user so I have no direct experience of the nature o
> BarFly, but I do know that a number of people have posted tunes in
> abc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am not a Mac user so I have no direct experience of the nature of
> BarFly, but I do know that a number of people have posted tunes in abc
> generated by using BarFly. From where I'm standing these are BarFly
> output. They appear to have various characteristics
Jack Campin said -
>BarFly doesn't *have* output; it's a text editor, it doesn't enforce
>any ABC dialect any more than Emacs does.
Don't text editors have output?
I am not a Mac user so I have no direct experience of the nature of BarFly, but I do know that a number of people have posted tunes
