or
immature; most of
the people on this list are much smarter than me regarding these topics ;-)
Stevie
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 10:03 PM
> To: Beck, Stefan <s.b...@osram.com>; ace@ietf
I totally agree with Mike.
BTW, Hannes, this was "part a." of Idea #1 - the only added value I've seen
was that the device
could raise an alarm - so there is awareness of an attack at least "after the
fact". However,
it adds complexity to the constrained device - and alternatively, one could
) should not exceed ~200 ms.
Stevie
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Atkins [mailto:de...@ihtfp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:51 PM
> To: Beck, Stefan <s.b...@osram.com>
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@arm.com>; ace@ietf.org
> Subjec
Yes, correct.
Stevie
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 2:52 PM
> To: Beck, Stefan <s.b...@osram.com>; ace@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: multicast
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I a
