[Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-01-28 Thread Ben Alex
Hi everyone I've now closed all JIRA tasks related to 1.0.0 RC2 that were assigned to me. Would others with tasks assigned to them please take a look over the next week, as ideally I'd like to get the formal release out in about seven days. Everyone is also encouraged to try out the changes an

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-02-09 Thread Garvey, Paul M (GE Commercial Finance)
://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=22067 Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Alex Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 6:02 PM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2 Hi everyone

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-02-09 Thread Ben Alex
Garvey, Paul M (GE Commercial Finance) wrote: All, Does anyone know if there is any plan to fix/investigate the Siteminder/Acegi integration issue I posted a few days ago. I made any attempt at fixing the issue but would like to know if anyone looked at it. http://forum.springframework.org/sho

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-02-09 Thread Scott McCrory
Paul,I don't extend SiteminderAuthenticationProcessingFilter and override the requiresAuthentication() method because every one of my protected action classes first checks to see if the user is authenticated (i.e. has an security context holder) before processing the request.  I do this by calling

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-02-10 Thread Garvey, Paul M (GE Commercial Finance)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott McCrorySent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:14 PMTo: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2 Paul, I don't extend SiteminderAuthenticationProcessingFilter and overrid

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-02-11 Thread scott
: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2   Scott, You are partially right I should not have to extend the SiteminderAuthenticationProcessingFilter to make Acegi work with Siteminder. The reason I

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-02-13 Thread Garvey, Paul M (GE Comm Fin)
Saturday, February 11, 2006 3:18 PMTo: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2 Paul,     What would you recommend instead?  The only other option off the top of my head would be to make sure the filter is executed upon every request.     Scott

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-03-08 Thread scott
6 12:50 PMTo: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2   Scott,   This is my recommendation, the following snippets below shows how I cleanly got Siteminder/Acegi to work. Look at the requiresAuthentication()

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-03-09 Thread Ben Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul, I know it's been 3 weeks since you sent this and I'm sorry not to have replied. I have a number of professional and personal obligations taking all of my time. If anyone else has a change to review Paul's proposal, please feel free to do so. I plan to get

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2

2006-03-12 Thread scott
nt: Thursday, March 09, 2006 4:27 PM > To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 1.0.0 RC2 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Paul, > > I know it's been 3 weeks since you sent this and I'm