https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flor...@mickler.org
--
Configure b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #65 from Marcin Inkielman 2009-07-27
18:18:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=22515)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22515)
output from dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #64 from Marcin Inkielman 2009-07-27
18:17:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=22514)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22514)
output from acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
Marcin Inkielman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@inkielman.pl
--- Comment #63
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #62 from [EM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #60 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 12:07 ---
Thanks for checking that. I already made a proper patch for reducing threshold
value to 8, and it should be picked up soon...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 12:02 ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> Could you please check if patch from bug #11896 (comment #51) works/breaks
> your
> system?
>
Sorry, this patch changed nothing.
When ACPI_EC_STO
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 08:38 ---
Please try both 8 and 20 values -- Yakui thinks this patch may solve all our
problems, so may be 8 or whole storm detection is not needed any longer...
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 08:35 ---
Should I test this patch alone, or with some other patches?
And should I revert the ACPI_EC_STORM_THRESHOLD to the default 20 or leave it
at 8 that is currently working for me
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 08:25 ---
Could you please check if patch from bug #11896 (comment #51) works/breaks your
system?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 05:04 ---
Is there anything else I can do for now?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-09 09:21 ---
Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-08 17:18 ---
Definitely 8, after several complete shutdowns.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-08 16:43 ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> Well, this is why we are trying to detect interrupt storm... Could you find
> the
> max value at which detection reliably happens ?
>
So 8 is the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-08 13:01 ---
Exactly. ASUS eeePC have the storm issue as well, but it looks less severe, or
may be CPU there is not fast enough to service so many interrupts per
transaction.
On their hardw
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-08 12:34 ---
Well at 1 its happening of course, what you would suggest the median value
should be?
I think I will start with ACPI_EC_STORM_THRESHOLD = 10, it is a half way from
original 20
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-08 12:17 ---
Well, this is why we are trying to detect interrupt storm... Could you find the
max value at which detection reliably happens ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-08 12:00 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> Thanks.
> Let's drop last patch for now and check if poll mode still works for you.
> Please set ACPI_EC_STORM_THRESHOLD to something low (0-5?). Th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 17:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=18712)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18712&action=view)
dmesg of forced poll mode.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kerne
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 17:05 ---
Alexey,
without the last patch, using only the previous 3 patches, and with
ACPI_EC_STORM_THRESHOLD set to 1, forcing the poll mode, all works ok.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 15:02 ---
Thanks.
Let's drop last patch for now and check if poll mode still works for you.
Please set ACPI_EC_STORM_THRESHOLD to something low (0-5?). This should force
gpe to be disabl
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 13:43 ---
Alexey,
Being a programmer myself
(applications not system and unfortunately not for Linux yet)
I do understand what a few lines of code can do, especially for such critical
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 13:21 ---
Mark,
Let me explain situation from my POV. With this bug we have regression, as you
say from 2.6.26. So, the ultimate solution will be to revert all the changes to
EC since 2.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 07:58 ---
Yakui, thanks.
However without acpi_video the screen won't turn off completely, only go blank,
the backlight is still on, which is not so good thing for a laptop :).
I will try
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 07:16 ---
Hi, Mark
Thanks for the test. It is very lucky that my patch set can make your box
work well.
Please don't enable the acpi_video driver. After the acpi_video driver is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 06:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=18707)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18707&action=view)
the dmesg of 4 patches from Yakui and #11917C3
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 06:04 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
Well, so far the 4 patches Yakui provided here plus the patch from bug #11917
commwnt 3 are holding up, the EC works and all seems fine, full dmesg is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18705|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 03:41 ---
Alexey,
The forth patch from comment #26 did the following:
out of 6 reboots,
on 2 reboots, the EC stopped working somewhere during the boot process.
on 1 reboot, the EC stoppe
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 03:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=18705)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18705&action=view)
the dmesg of 4 patches proposed by Alexey.
I'm going to try the Yakui's
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:54 ---
Hi, Alexey
Why do you think that my patch set is useless?
Please note that it is a regression. In the 2.6.26 kernel the system can
work well. And in the 2.6.26 kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:46 ---
Hi, Mark
Will you please try the attched patch set(#C28,30, 32, 33) on the latest
kernel(2.6.28-rc3) and see whether the problem still exists? (Of course the
patch in http:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=18704)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18704&action=view)
[patch 4/4]: Disable EC burst mode when returning incorrect Acknowledge b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=18703)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18703&action=view)
[patch 3/4]: Add some delay in ec gpe handler to workaround the GPE storm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:35 ---
Yakui,
I told you several times, your 4-patches 500+ lines "try-it-please" series does
not help.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=18702)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18702&action=view)
[patch 2/4] add the 2us delay before checking EC status while in polling
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:33 ---
yakui,
in "no acpi_video" dmesg it have died 2 seconds earlier, at "[ 17.069461]
ACPI: EC: transaction start". Notice that EC returns same 0x90 value as from
BURST_ENABLE com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=18701)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18701&action=view)
[Patch 1/4]: the EC transaction is explicitly divided into several phases
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 00:15 ---
Hi, Mark
Will you please attach the dmesg on 2.6.26 stable kernel?
From the log in comment #18 it seems that EC is crashed after the reporting
the following message. Afte
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 23:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=18700)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18700&action=view)
Wait for EC to clean up
Please add this patch on top.
--
Configure bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 16:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=18696)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18696&action=view)
dmesg with 3 suggested patches.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 16:17 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Mark,
> Actually, there is a number of pending patches, you could see the list in bug
> #11896. Please check if the last set works for you...
>
Sor
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 14:23 ---
correct.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 14:03 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Mark,
> Actually, there is a number of pending patches, you could see the list in bug
> #11896. Please check if the last set works for you...
>
ju
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 13:31 ---
Mark,
please uncomment DEBUG in drivers/acpi/ec.c, enable time stamps in printk and
attach here dmesg before and after EC stopped working.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 13:50 ---
Mark,
Actually, there is a number of pending patches, you could see the list in bug
#11896. Please check if the last set works for you...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzil
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 13:09 ---
Is there anything else I can do to help resolve this?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-04 15:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=18672)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18672&action=view)
dmesg with acpi_video disabled
No joy here.
With acpi_video disabled I'v
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-02 17:12 ---
Please deselect the "CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO" in kernel configuration .
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-31 04:08 ---
I meant acpi_video not acpi_driver in previous comment, my bet.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-31 01:51 ---
Hi, Ykzhao
The 2.6.26 is working as it should.
Also as I said in the comment #1, if I revert this patch for EC driver (
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/11/43 ), on either the 2.6.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 19:34 ---
Hi, Mark
Will you please double check whether the box can work well on 2.6.26
kernel?
Will you please not load the acpi_video driver on 2.6.27 kernel and see
whether th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 18:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=18538)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18538&action=view)
dmesg with debug output and patch 18529
This patch didn't help either, t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 16:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=18537)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18537&action=view)
lshal -m log
this is a log of lshal -m
Here is the last two minutes, be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 16:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18532)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18532&action=view)
the dmesg with patch set from 11896
the 4 patches from the
http://bugzill
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 16:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=18536)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18536&action=view)
therm output half an hour later.
half an hour after the boot, the therma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 16:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=18535)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18535&action=view)
therm output after the boot.
immediately after the boot, the thermal sta
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 16:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=18534)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18534&action=view)
ouput of /proc/acpi/battery/*/state half a hour later
in this output the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 16:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=18533)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18533&action=view)
/proc/acpi/battery/*/state output
this is the output of /proc/acpi/batter
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 15:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=18529)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18529&action=view)
remove msleep from poll mode
Mark, could you please check if this patch c
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-30 02:09 ---
Hi, Mark
Will you please try the patch set in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11896#C1,2,3,4 on the latest
kernel(2.6.28-rc2) and see whether the problem still e
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
66 matches
Mail list logo
