http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #44 from ykzhao 2009-11-18 07:25:23 ---
Thanks for the reporting.
It is good news that the system can work well on the latest upstream
kernel.
It will be great if we can identify the commit which fixes this issue.
Anyway,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #43 from Pascal Häußler 2009-11-03
08:37:06 ---
Hi,
sorry for the long time without any new information. I have news to report:
The system works fine with SMP and C states enabled when I use kernel 2.6.31. I
tried the recently r
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #42 from ykzhao 2009-06-18 09:50:29 ---
Hi, Pascal
Thanks for the confirmation.
It seems that the box can be booted normally only when the C1 is used or in
single-core mode.
If the cpu can enter c2/c3, it can't be waken
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #41 from Pascal Häußler 2009-06-12
19:37:47 ---
Hi,
here we go with the test results:
1) hpet=disable --> system boot fails.
2) acpi_skip_timer_override --> system boot fails.
3) hpet=disable + acpi_skip_timer_override -->
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #40 from ykzhao 2009-06-08 09:30:29 ---
Hi, Pascal
Sorry for the late response. And thanks for the confirm again.
From the above test in comment #39/34 it seems that the box can be booted
with the following options:
a. n
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
Pascal Häußler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.24, 2.6.27 |2.6.24, 2.6.27, 2.6.28,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #38 from ykzhao 2009-05-06 02:14:17 ---
Hi, Pascal
Sorry for the slow response.
From the comment #36 it seems that the box can be booted with
"processor.max_cstate=1". But from the comment #9 it seems that the box can't
be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #37 from Pascal Häußler 2009-04-29
05:10:51 ---
Hi,
I just see that the status is till NEED INFO. Did I miss anything? Do I need to
do another test?
Best regards,
Pascal
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #36 from Pascal Häußler 2009-03-30
21:04:39 ---
Hi,
sorry for the confusion. I thought I was expected to test the two parameters
explicitly in combination. Here we go with the individual tests:
1) idle=nomwait - system does *not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #35 from ykz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
Pascal Häußler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|--- |No
--- Comment #34 from Pascal Häußle
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #33 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:30 ---
Congrats, Pascal. :)
Now you just need to try kernel 2.6.29.
you can get the source code tarball linux-2.6.29.tar.bz2 at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #32 from pascal.haeuss...@gmx.net 2009-03-23 02:43 ---
Hi all,
sorry for my late reply. I was (and am) very busy since I became a daddy - my
wife and me got our first child Paul. There was no time for any kernel testing
in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #31 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #30 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-04 22:25 ---
Hi, Pascal
Do you have an opportunity to try the boot option of "nolapic_timer" on the
latest kernel and see whether the box can be booted normally?
Will you please
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #29 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-04 20:04 ---
Hi, Pascal
Sorry for the late response.
Will you please try the boot option of "nolapic_timer" on the latest
kernel(2.6.29-rc2/rc3) and see whether the box can be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-01 22:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=19097)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19097&action=view)
screen shot of system in crashed state - highres=off
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-01 22:04 ---
Hi,
here are the test results:
1) nohz=off
--> The system boots using both CPU cores.
2) highres=off
--> The system crashes in early boot. The crash screen looks
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #26 from [
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 10:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=19015)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19015&action=view)
content of /proc/cpuinfo
The file contains the content of /proc/cpuinfo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 10:09 ---
Hi,
here we go with the latest experiment results:
a) boot option: nolapic
Result: System boots but detects and uses only one processor core.
b) boot option: nolapic_time
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 00:00 ---
Hi, Pascal
thanks for the info.
From the acpidump it seems that C2/C3 is supported on MP system.
>C2 works on MP system : 1
But from the problem description th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19003|output of acpidump |Hi,
description|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 09:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=19003)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19003&action=view)
output of acpidump
Output of the following command:
acpidump > acpidump
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19003|Hi, |acpidump.out
description|here w
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 23:09 ---
Hi, Pascal
You attach two files in comment #11, #12. The two files are obtained by
using the following commands:
acpidump --addr 0x7ffce190 --length 0x1FA -o cpu0ist
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 22:18 ---
Hi,
can you give me more detail about what additional output I should generate with
acpidump? I have already attached the two acpidump outputs you have requested
in your comme
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 05:43 ---
Please attach the output of acpidump.
Sorry I don't update the status of bug in time.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You ar
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 03:51 ---
Hi,
I've just seen that the state of this bug is still NEEDINFO. Is there anything
more you need from me at this stage?
best regards,
Pascal
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 22:12 ---
Hi,
here are the test results:
1) Tested boot with thermal.off=1
Result: The system crashes (screen looks the same as if I ommit this
option).
2) Tested boot with maxcp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ACPICA-Core |Power-Processor
KernelVersion|2.6
33 matches
Mail list logo
