Hi everyone,
If I have a user in a group (LondonUsers), which is itself a member of
another group (AllUsers), is there a single ADSI call I can make to test
for membership of the user in AllUsers?
I want to group my users in nested groups, and have logon scripts take
actions based on whether
Tasneem,
the format of a UTC time is described in
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sysinfo/ti
me_0fzm.asp
It is the number of 100-nanosecond intervals since January 1, 1601. With
the Win32-API-Function 'FileTimeToSystemTime' it can be converted to a
readable
We currently have Groupwise 5.5 and do not use Novell's eDirectory. We have about 250
users spread across four sites. One of the remote site use Metaframe to connect to
the network. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/3/2002 4:39:33 PM
What Version of GroupWise are
Thanks for the tip
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Lloyd
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Migration Question
Know where you want to go and want to provide up front and
Hello everyone,
If you have a root domain in native mode, can you add a
child to that root domain in mixed mode?
Thanks,
Brian Pietrewicz
Title: Message
Absolutely.
-Original Message-From: Brian Pietrewicz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:27
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir]
Mixed mode
Hello everyone,
If you have a root domain in
native mode, can you add a
Title: Message
Nope. Once in native mode the whole forest must be native.
Only other forest can be mixed and connected via trust.
-Original Message-From: Brian Pietrewicz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:27
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Title: Message
Actually, I don't think that's true. You can change the mode of a
single domain from mixed to native, but this doesn't force a change in other
domains. In fact, I've added child domains to a native parent domain, and
have had to go back and manually change to mode to native
Title: Message
OK,
maybe I am confused. But I thought the whole forest had to be native not
indv. child domains. Maybe I spoke too soon?
-Original Message-From: David M Ha
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:44
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
Title: Message
Rachui
is correct. Native mode is domain-specific not forest.
-Original Message-From: Rachui, Scott
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04,
2002 8:51 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed mode
Actually, I don't think that's
I always thought UTC in relation to computing was the number of non-leap
seconds that have elapsed since 00:00:00 January 1, 1970. I find the choice
of Jan 01, 1601 to be a little bizarre in this context. Was this a typo? Or
is that how UTC is now measured in AD?
-Original Message-
Title: Message
I
spoke too quick. I learned something today. Thanks for not flaming
me. I am on an Exchange list that would have burnt me for this
one.
Thanks,
Joe
S.
-Original Message-From: David M Ha
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:57
AMTo:
Title: Message
Sorry,
But
How unsubscribe
Thank
you.
-Original Message-From: Joe Sargent
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:59
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Mixed mode
***
No virus was
Title: Message
No
problem, Joe. I've made tons of mis-statements in my career, and I may
very well make one or two of them on here that I'll need correction on.
It's always a learning experience for me.
Scott
-Original Message-From: Joe Sargent
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Do you have any specific info on the future versions that may allow removal
of schema extensions? We are starting a discussion on a schema change
policy and this would be very timly info.
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Rachui, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03,
Thanks for your input. I should have put modify instead of change. I was
trying to encompass everything. This is why I did not put all changes:
Many schema modifications cannot be reversed, so you must make sure that
changes are planned and well thought out before they are implemented.
Title: Message
No we
wouldn't have. ;o)
William
-Original Message-From: Joe Sargent
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:23
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Mixed mode
I
spoke too quick. I learned something today. Thanks for not
Title: Message
Just
to extend on it!
The
support of both modes is required as an NT 4.0 domain that joins a AD Forest
does so initially in Mixed mode to allow the ongoing support of the NT 4.0 BDC's
still on the network. it is also required to ensure that you do not immediately
lose
I would suggest 3 boxes. You have the alpha.com master domain controller
already. Build the new internal.alpha.com on a new box and migrate the
beta.com folks to internal.alpha. Take the old beta.com DC and build a new
external.alpha.com, then migrate alpha.com down to external. Now the box
that
Although you give both the pre and post states domains in fully
qualified formats and not NetBIOS it is not clear if the existing
accounts domains are already AD? If not the clear path to minimise the
impact to users is to migrate the domains to a new forest i.e. Create
your 3 domain forest
Some operating systems start counting on January 1, 1970, some in another
year. For Windows the starting date is January 1, 1601, as stated in the
programming information for the Win32-API. To be sure I made a rough
calculation of the number stated in the mail below. It is 401 years and
some days
21 matches
Mail list logo
