[ActiveDir] Mixed to Native

2003-03-27 Thread rrutherford
Hi All, I've finally migrated my last remote office into my 2000 domain. All of my NT BDCs are gone and I'm 100% 2000 on the DCs I still have a couple offices on NT workstations. It's been some time since I've focussed on 2000 and can't remember if there are any gotchas with the move from

RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native

2003-03-27 Thread Roger Seielstad
The worst part of the mixed to native mode conversion is picking which refreshing beverage you're going to enjoy when its done. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From:

RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native

2003-03-27 Thread Sullivan, Kevin
Always a good Guinness! Easy! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:06 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native The worst part of the mixed to native mode conversion is picking which refreshing

RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native

2003-03-27 Thread rrutherford
lol. Cheers Roger Robert Rutherford MIS Department - DEK +44 (0)1305 208232 +44 (0)7970 122362 Roger Seielstad

[ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Amit Zinman
Hi, If any of you ever did synchronize your AD with Oracle or Unix I would love to hear your input on this matter. Thanks, Amit Zinman Systems Consultant Integrity Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-7522424 058-326753

RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Amit Zinman
Title: Message Biztalk is cool, but more for data Exchange. We are more interested in synchronizing passwords or providing some sort of smart logon or unified administration or even single-sign on (one can just dream). Amit Zinman Systems Consultant Integrity Systems [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US
I believe Microsoft MetaDirectory should handle this Amit Zinman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/27/2003 10:02 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and

Re: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Missy Koslosky
Or Compaq/HP's LDSU, which is more flexible and less costly when you consider the ease of use! Missy - Original Message - From: John Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization

[ActiveDir] AD synchronization

2003-03-27 Thread Don Murawski (Lenox)
Title: Message If forest prep has already been ran, and a new E2k Server is brought up does a full AD Synchronization take place on all GCs? Don L. Murawski Sr. Network Administrator WorldTravel BTI Phone: (404) 923-9468 Fax: (404) 949-6710 Cell: (678) 549-1264 attachment:

RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Roger Seielstad
Title: Message Since Oracle user admin can be done with SQL statements (I think), there's no reason BizTalk couldn't be used. It would also help link AD to your HR/ERP/CRM apps. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems

Re: [ActiveDir] AD synchronization

2003-03-27 Thread Marc Zukerman
Title: Message Yes, but it's just the GC sync, not AD. - Original Message - From: Don Murawski (Lenox) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:21 AM Subject: [ActiveDir] AD synchronization If forest prep has already been ran, and a new

RE: [ActiveDir] AD synchronization

2003-03-27 Thread Don Murawski (Lenox)
Title: Message It's been a year since since forest prep was ran, does it need to be ran again? Also, does domain prep need to ran? We have an empty root domain, with two child domains. One of the child domains will have two E2k servers, one will be OWA only. -Original

Re: [ActiveDir] AD synchronization

2003-03-27 Thread Marc Zukerman
Title: Message Assuming you are keeping the organization name the same, no you do not need to run it again. Domain prep needs to be run once for each domain that exists. It's a very quick thing that creates the groups for you. If you will not have an Exchange server in a domain, it still

RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Jimmy Andersson
Title: Message CPS-Systems have really improved the ODBC interface in SimpleSync and can both Provision new User Accounts as well as maintain pre-existing accounts, from any Oracle feed, either LDAP or CSV. I know of a client that is installing this solution this weekend - with the result

RE: [ActiveDir] AD synchronization

2003-03-27 Thread Don Murawski (Lenox)
Title: Message Ok, let me ask this. When forest prep and domain prep was ran, the child domain was in mixed mode, since we have switched to native. Should domain prep be ran again? -Original Message-From: Marc Zukerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27,

RE: [ActiveDir] Restart/Start Services Right

2003-03-27 Thread jim . katoe
Great news Guido, and an answer to a post someone made from a month ago. Thanks. GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP-Germany,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/26/2003 03:22 PM Please respond to ActiveDir To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:

Re: [ActiveDir] AD synchronization

2003-03-27 Thread Marc Zukerman
Title: Message No need. The groups that are created are global groups which are unaffected by a changeover to native mode. Very good question though... Marc Zukerman Senior Network Engineer Greenwich Technology Partners - Original Message - From: Don Murawski (Lenox) To:

RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Martin Tuip
Title: Message That is what I was thinking of as well. CPS does have good customer base and not just small companies. Martin Tuip MVP Exchange www.sharepointserver.com -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy

[ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users

2003-03-27 Thread John F. Hann
Title: Message Is the BadPwdCount propertyread only? I have tried to reset this with the following script and get errors Set Ulist = GetObject("LDAP://ou=My Users,DC=My,DC=domain,DC=com")For Each User In Ulist If user.badpwdcount 5 thenWScript.Echo(user.fullname " " user.badpwdcount)

Re: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Jerry Welch
Title: Message Martin, Good of you to give us a 'thumbs up' ! Will we see you at Tech Ed / MEC 2003 this year? Take care, Jerry - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:39 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]

RE: [ActiveDir] Synchronization with Unix and Oracle

2003-03-27 Thread Ryan Finnesey
Title: Message I have worked with them and they have very good support. We had to sync Novel NDS, 8 Active Directory Forests and a people soft database. Ryan -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:40 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users

2003-03-27 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Title: Message Hi John, I would have thought that it was read-only, but I didn't see anything in the schema or the SD that would make it read-only. What kind of errors are you getting? -gil -Original Message-From: John F. Hann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

RE: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users

2003-03-27 Thread Free, Bob
It's a SAM read-only object AFAIK, you can't modify it. -Original Message- From: John F. Hann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:02 PM To: ActiveDir List Subject: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users Is the BadPwdCount property read only? I have

RE: [ActiveDir] Last Logon Details

2003-03-27 Thread Jones, Rick J.(Desktop Engineering)
Hi; I am trying to retrieve the last logon account information for a specific computer account from Active Directory. Does anyone have a script to do this? Or... If you have another way to determine when the system last logged onto the network. This is so we can verify that the account is an

RE: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users

2003-03-27 Thread John F. Hann
Title: Message err.number = -2147016651 And it does not reset to 0 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil KirkpatrickSent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:19 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount

RE: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users

2003-03-27 Thread John F. Hann
Thing is...You can go into ADSIEdit and modify it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users It's a SAM

RE: [ActiveDir] Reset BadPwdCount property for users

2003-03-27 Thread Free, Bob
Thing is...You can go into ADSIEdit and modify it But is that against the content rules ??? Content rules determine the mandatory and optional attributes of the class instances that are stored in the directory. New objects must contain all of the mandatory attributes that are specified by