RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread SEYBOLDT,VOLKER (HP-Germany,ex1)
HI, well most of the topics about Proxy Server were still mentioned. We had the same discussion a few months ago and this is a problem if you have different browsers in use. So in deed GPOs (default settings) and IEAK can only be used for Internet Explorer which reduces the solutions. We figured

RE: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Rick Kingslan
Title: Message Glenn,   Interesting questions, and I'd like to take a shot at lending an opinion on some of these points.  Firstly, privacy seems to have become a trure art form in the States.  From Graham-Leach-Bliley to HIPPA, we're regulated to the n-th degree.  I'm not sure if it's good

Re: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Glenn Corbett
Title: Message Thanks Todd.   At the moment, we arent hugely concerned about putting *some* privacy information into AD, as this instance of AD will only be for our external clients, and the attribute level ACL's provided by AD should provide enough security to stop certain applications / use

Re: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Sumilang
Workstation machine accounts? I don't think so nor recall anything about that? As for Authenticated Users group, yes. On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 01:48 PM, Darren Mar-Elia wrote: Richard- Where are the GPOs linked? Have you checked permissions on them to ensure that the workstation machine

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Robinson, Chuck
Check out KB http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b252898 I haven't used this feature, thought it could be relevant. -Original Message- From: Richard Sumilang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 7/8/2003 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [ActiveDir] admt 2.0 - nt4 computer migration

2003-07-08 Thread Duncan, Larry
Has the "Everyone" group been added to the "Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access" group in the new domain? -Original Message- From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] admt 2.0 - nt4 computer migration Am

Re: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Sumilang
How so? 072 World Wide Web Servers? On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 01:04 PM, Robinson, Chuck wrote: DHCP Scope Options? -Original Message- From: Richard Sumilang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 7/8/2003 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subj

RE: [ActiveDir] admt 2.0 - nt4 computer migration

2003-07-08 Thread Duncan, Larry
While continuing my interest in this issue, I came across the following Q-article that seems dead-on: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316073 -Original Message- From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Richard- Where are the GPOs linked? Have you checked permissions on them to ensure that the workstation machine accounts have Read and Apply Group Policy perms? Authenticated Users will do. -Original Message- From: Richard Sumilang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 20

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
Check under the Computer Configuration side of the GPO -Original Message- From: Duncan, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:44 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server Actually, I don't think so. The GPO path reference be

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Assuming the other browser stores it proxy settings in the registry, you can create a custom .adm template file and add it to a GPO, and set it that way. Let me know if you need pointers on doing that. -Original Message- From: Duncan, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July

[ActiveDir] admt 2.0 - nt4 computer migration

2003-07-08 Thread Graham Turner
Am attempting the migration of computer from NT4 source domain to Windows 2000 target domain. the migration environment is working fine with windows 2000 professional clients have got issues with the migration of an NT4 workstation the extract from dispatch.log on the admt server is attached fro

Re: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Sumilang
Thats why everyone should use a Mac!!! Hehehe, with my mac I can just specify it in my Network Settings for the system and that should work for all my browsers. Anyways since we are bringing up GPO, I have a finger to pick with that. For some reason my group policies are only getting applied on

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Robinson, Chuck
DHCP Scope Options? -Original Message- From: Richard Sumilang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 7/8/2003 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server Oh wait, hmmm that's only goo

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Duncan, Larry
Besides a hardware solution, both browser platforms support Proxy Auto-Configuration (PAC) files. But, this is a last-ditch effort by those in the know. IE, in particular, has been known to dislike PACs. Another alternative is to use the login script to modify the registry. Not pretty, but it work

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Duncan, Larry
Actually, I don't think so. The GPO path reference below appears to be missing the "Internet Explorer Maintenance" entry under Windows Settings. This would lead me to believe that it is a Microsoft-centric policy setting. -Original Message- From: Richard Sumilang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
GPO, there is a setting in the Computer Configuration section I believe -Original Message- From: Richard Sumilang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[ActiveDir] Proxy Server I'm running DHCP from my Windows 2000 S

RE: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Duncan, Larry
Title: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server Well, one benefit of going ahead and using IEAK is that if you use the Auto Config feature and change your settings/environment after the initial deployment of your IEAK package, then you can simply update the .INS file and the settings will be applied durin

Re: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Sumilang
Oh wait, hmmm that's only good for IE. Is there a way to do it regardless of their browser? On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 12:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Using GPO: User Configuration Windows Settings -Connection -Proxy Settings You can use IEAK for similar

Re: [ActiveDir] Proxy Server

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Sumilang
I assume that will work for whatever browser they are using correct (doesn't have to be IE)? On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 12:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Using GPO: User Configuration Windows Settings -Connection -Proxy Settings You can use IEAK for similar

RE: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message My spell checker broke my joke...   I ment to say Marchitecture.  As in Marketing Architecture.   I think the who IIS part is just a bad thing..   Todd -Original Message-From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:02 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

RE: [ActiveDir] First AD Domain?

2003-07-08 Thread Roger Seielstad
Title: Message Actually, a better strategy to use for M/A/D activities (merger/acquisition/divestiture) activities is to use domain name(s) which are completely removed from the company's name.   One of my two unofficial titles while we were part of a larger company was "Iron Chef - Migrati

RE: [ActiveDir] First AD Domain?

2003-07-08 Thread deji
I think both should be considered together. Example.net will be at the top (empty forest root) and ad.example.net will be the production child domain where you have all the user accounts and resources. Makes it easier when it comes time for aquisition/merger/spin-off/political and diplomatic emp

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Roger Seielstad
Title: Message You've apparently never met the pimp^H^H^H^H salesman of the StIcK, have you?     -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message-From: Gil Kirkpatrick

RE: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Duncan, Larry
Title: Message According to the "Technical Overview of Microsoft Identity Integration Server 2003" whitepaper, MIIS 2003 is the third major release of Microsoft's metadirectory product. This would mean that, yes; MIIS is indeed the next version of the MMS product.   http://www.microsoft

RE: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message Yes it is a new Architecture product from MMicrosoft.   The next question should be does it use IIS?   Todd -Original Message-From: Thommes, Michael M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:57 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Activ

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Title: Message I've always used the freeware predecessor to StIcK called KicK. Its not quite as fancy, but it requires no additional hardware.   -gil   -Original Message-From: Ayers, Diane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:51 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE

RE: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Title: Message Mike,   You're basically correct, although the renaming of MMS is accompanied by a broader IM strategy incorporating other products, services, and partnerships. MSFT is going to spell it out at Catlyst this week (today I think). IM has become a strategic issue for MSFT, partly

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Ayers, Diane
Title: Message I stil prefer the upgraded version, bIg stIck®   Diane -Original Message-From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:37 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages I ordered 1

RE: [ActiveDir] First AD Domain?

2003-07-08 Thread Roger Seielstad
Shorter is better, IMO. Now, you *could*, although I haven't tried it, do a non-contiguous forest using a contiguous namespace. This might get a little convoluted... In other words, it should be possible to create the root domain as root.example.net. Once that's complete, you should be able to in

RE: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Thommes, Michael M.
Title: Message I've been told that MIIS is really just MMS 3.0 renamed.  The description of the software would seem to indicate so.  Is this true?   Mike Thommes Argonne National Laboratory -Original Message-From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, Ju

[ActiveDir] First AD Domain?

2003-07-08 Thread Cary, Mark
I am wondering if there is a preferred location for the first (AKA root) domain in a AD forest given these parameters. Company name is example and they have a Internet presence at example.com. They have registered example.net for there AD DNS structure. example.net will never be resolvable in the

RE: [ActiveDir] Taking DC Offline

2003-07-08 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message Why not use a tool like Aelita's In-trust http://www.aelita.com/products/InTrust.htm to run the scans against the production environment, I would also mention BV-Control, but I am mad at bindview right now and don't want to promote their products. (Long story).  It would be le

OT Re: [ActiveDir] SP4

2003-07-08 Thread Brad Mccrillis
We run application center and SP4 seems to corrupt MSSQL$MSAC. To correct it is easy enough, you uninstall MSDE through app center install and then re-install and re-apply MSDE SP2. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/07/03 03:40PM >>> Anyone installed SP4 yet on their DC's? If so, have you had any issues?

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message I ordered 10 StIcK's (tm) and they work great.  I name my StIck's for the special purposes they serve.  The best thing is one size fits all!   Toddler -Original Message-From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:56 AMTo: '

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Puckett, Richard
Well, a couple of solutions exist here: 1. You can set a generic notification at logon time Start->Programs->Administrative Tools->Local Security Policy->Local Policies->Security Options-> Message Text/Title for Users Attempting to Logon You could say something menacing like "I know wh

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DOS vulnerability

2003-07-08 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Excellent info! Keep this stuff coming. I also use the GPO to enforce group memberships as well as some registry tips. I plan to write a story on my Blog soon that talks about this information. I will send you the URL when the blog starts to take shape. Todd -Original Message- From:

RE: [ActiveDir] Identity Management using AD

2003-07-08 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message We are in the process of evaluating MIIS here, and AD is currently our source for authentication information, for Enterprise application, we are using a custom database running on Critical Path to sync with other application directories, and get a metaview of the information f

RE: [ActiveDir] Taking DC Offline

2003-07-08 Thread Leeuwen van, JWJ (Joost)
Title: Message This vbscript unlocks all users in a OU, modify for your needs   while TRUE   Set objOU = GetObject("LDAP://OU=Spider,OU=Betalingsverkeer,DC=rnbvu,DC=rabobank,DC=corp")objOU.Filter = Array("User")   For Each objUser In objOU call unLockUser(objUser.sAMAccountName)Next  

[ActiveDir] Folder Redirection

2003-07-08 Thread Jerry Johnson
Hi All, I am testing folder redirection in windows 2000 with positive results except for one problem: In the policy removal section I have checked the option to redirect the folder back to the local user profile location when policy is removed. When I remove the policy the user still goes to the s

Re: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread jim . katoe
Title: Message My father must have had a PhD in StIcK(tm).--Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld  - Original Message -  From: ActiveDir-owner  Sent: 07/08/2003 08:55 AM  To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times &

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Roger Seielstad
Title: Message The StIcK(tm) is a wonderful tool for addressing those issues which aren't quite technological in nature. Its generally applied, somewhat liberally, by a trained professional.   Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE

RE: [ActiveDir] Taking DC Offline

2003-07-08 Thread Steve Rochford
Title: Message I know that your program is far better than any script but an unlock script is easy to do and might give a starting point to people wanting to write scripts. What I've done before is:   net user > users.txt   Load the users.txt file into Excel and remove the header/footer. Ma

RE: [ActiveDir] Taking DC Offline

2003-07-08 Thread GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP-Germany,ex1)
Title: Message nice tool Joe, but you should add a time filter.  In an attack-scenario (be it hacker or auditors), you don't necessarily want to unlock all the locked accounts you find - instead you want to unlock the ones that were locked after a specific time (this is the approach I took -

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Mr Clark
Title: Message And what, exactly would be StIck?   How would ISA server, or a web filter program change/customize the logon message? Thanks.   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 06:43

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, Logon times & Custom messages

2003-07-08 Thread Roger Seielstad
Title: Message The right tool for this job might just be the StIcK(tm)  ;)   Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM