Re: [ActiveDir] Is this like AD blog season or what?

2006-06-09 Thread AdamT
Not an AD blog, but I quite enjoy Raymond Chen's blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/ Interesting stuff, even if you're not a Win32 API guru. And let's not forget the blog of the SBS Diva ;-) http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/ On 09/06/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <[EM

RE: [ActiveDir] PCs hang at "Applying computer settings" after upgradingDCs to 2K3 SP1

2006-06-09 Thread Brian Desmond
No, that's a layer 8 issue - operator error. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 7:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.

Re: [ActiveDir] PCs hang at "Applying computer settings" after upgradingDCs to 2K3 SP1

2006-06-09 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
And when you put ISA on a DC... we prob go into negative layers... ;-) Brian Desmond wrote: *When I think of a firewall I think of a layer 4 contraption. Layer 7 is like putting ISA or something on the box.* * * *Thanks,* *Brian Desmond* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *c - 312.731.3132* * * *F

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Brian Desmond
What you need to do is get your file servers at strategic points on your WAN (hub, edges, etc) setup and use DFSR to replicate the MSI. Then you can deploy the MSI from the DFS path and your clients will use the local copy. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 -Original

RE: [ActiveDir] WMI Filter

2006-06-09 Thread Brian Desmond
That is correct. XP and newer only.   Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]   c - 312.731.3132   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa, Johnny Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 1:19 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W

RE: RE : RE: [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
You can use SPA, or you can use logman and tracerpt to get detailed LDAP stats. SPA does a lot of analysis for you and diagnoses several classes of AD perf problems. Tracerpt will give you a fairly raw look at all the LDAP traffic. I covered all three in my DEC AD Performance session (which I

RE: [ActiveDir] Another GPO question

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Well, both really. If you User Assign an application, it can be installed at logon or just advertised (i.e. install on first use). It will also appear in ARP unless you check the box for it to not appear. Darren Darren Mar-Elia For comprehensive Windows Group Policy Information, check out www.gp

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Generally speaking, no, they won't break. It gets a little complicated. Let's say that the application is a single MSI with embedded files. That MSI gets cached on the workstation during install. So if, for example, the app needs to be repaired or removed, then it will find that cached MSI and life

RE: [ActiveDir] Another GPO question

2006-06-09 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
One more question - if you assign a software package to users, does it push to their PC when they login next or when they click "add" in add/remove programs? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:38

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
Are you saying that if I deployed an MSI to a bunch of users from a single fileshare and later get rid of that share, all those users GPO installed apps are going to break even though they completely have the software installed? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: [ActiveDir] Password Policy change

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Password policy changes for domain user accounts can only take affect if they are linked to a GPO at the domain level. I have a short video training session that explains this at www.gpoguy.com/training.htm if you're interested in understanding more. So, bottom line is that if you're making passwo

Re: [ActiveDir] question regarding Tony's article on linked attributes

2006-06-09 Thread Brett Shirley
It is 1/2 a dozen of one, 1/2 a dozen of the other ... We "store forward links", but AD defines a table, with indices such that we have an efficient way to lookup backlinks for a given object. Don't have time right now to show you what I mean, but my Daddy says there are 24 usable hours in the da

[ActiveDir] Password Policy change

2006-06-09 Thread Chris Flesher
Hello, When the default domain controller policy is changed in respect to password complexity, length, etc., how long is it before the change takes affect? We have an automated system that is trying to change passwords but is getting bounced back that the password doesn't meet complexity. I change

RE: [ActiveDir] Another GPO question

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
First I wouldn't use such a wide-open group as Domain Users to target your install. If you do, then you pick up a lot of unwilling victims. I would try creating a special group just for this deployment and use that to security filter either the GPO or the individual app. But, if you need to use D

RE: [ActiveDir] WMI Filter

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Yes, definitely true. Win2K is blind to WMI Filters...   Darren   Darren Mar-Elia For comprehensive Windows Group Policy Information, check out www.gpoguy.com-- the best source for GPO tips, tools and whitepapers. Also check out the Windows Group Policy Guide, a soup-to-nuts resource for Gr

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Russ- The right answer with Software Installation is pretty much to always use DFS. That way if the package ever has to physically move off of a server, the path doesn't have to change. Path changes aren't supported in GPSI without a re-install. So,to answer your question, yes, I would use DFS to d

[ActiveDir] Is this like AD blog season or what?

2006-06-09 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Active Directory Discussion : Introducing the Active Directory Discussion Blog: http://blogs.technet.com/ad/archive/2006/06/09/434604.aspx -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com The SBS product team wants to hear from you: http://msmvps.com/bl

[ActiveDir] Another GPO question

2006-06-09 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
If I assign a software GPO to all users (domain users), how do I ensure that if one of those users is in the IT department, they won't unknowingly push the Office Communicator installation to every server in our server room? ~~ This e-mail is confi

[ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
I'm wanting to deploy an MSI (office communicator) to 100% of the desktops in our domain. These desktops are scattered across the world over various wan links. I'd like to deploy it with a GPO (assign the software, not force the install), but I also don't want to kill our wan links. Is there an

[ActiveDir] question regarding Tony's article on linked attributes

2006-06-09 Thread Willem Kasdorp
Hi,   I was just reading Tony's article (http://www.activedir.org/article.aspx?aid=92) on linked attributes, and encountered something that I wondered about. This section "Why have linked attributes?" says:   "I haven't seen an official explanation, but I can think of two reasons why

RE: RE : RE: [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Steve Linehan
It is true that SPA is not localized but I believe the French version will be ok.  The problem comes about with the localization of the perfmon data.  If you have problems post back and we can try a few work arounds because we are only really interested in the trace data at this point which

RE: [ActiveDir] WMI Filter

2006-06-09 Thread Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
That would explain it! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa, JohnnySent: Friday, June 09, 2006 1:20 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] WMI Filter I thought WMI filters could only be evaluated by XP or 2003 ?, 2000, NT will ignore

RE: [ActiveDir] WMI Filter

2006-06-09 Thread Figueroa, Johnny
I thought WMI filters could only be evaluated by XP or 2003 ?, 2000, NT will ignore the filter and apply. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clay, Justin (ITS)Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 10:55To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] WMI Filter I t

[ActiveDir] WMI Filter

2006-06-09 Thread Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
I think I did something wrong... I was using this WMI filter on a GPO:   "select * from Win32_OperatingSystem where Caption = "Microsoft Windows XP Professional" OR Caption = "Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional""   I was doing this to keep this GPO from applying to server operating systems,

RE : RE: [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Yann
Thank you for your answer Steve. I will install spa on monday and see if i can log some ldpa activities (errors, connections pb,etc...).   Will this version of spa work on a w2k3 sp1 French version ?   Regards,   YannSteve Linehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : I would sugg

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] User Accounts

2006-06-09 Thread Brett Shirley
The limit on the number non-linked multi-values (~800 - ~1300 depending) probably wouldn't apply (even if you put each post for a given thread it's own value) ... the max LDAP packet size (10MBs) would apply though, your posts can get Looonnngg. Cheers, BrettSh On Thu, 8 Jun 2

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Security Policy Thoughts

2006-06-09 Thread Noah Eiger
Thanks. I’ll take a look.   -- nme   P.S. Susan, I will get my nominations in order!   From: Brian Desmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11:36 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Security Policy Thoughts   NAC != .1x.

Re: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange mailnickname

2006-06-09 Thread Al Mulnick
Credentials should be unique within an organization. Mail attributes, logons of any type, and any identifying information such as samaccountname, alias, cn, etc should be the same across a user for the sake of troubleshooting and preventing duplicates and the issues that come along with that.

RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange mailnickname

2006-06-09 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Not that I've run into, as far as accessing subfolders via OWA. Again, this would be very easy for you to confirm in your environment and throw back at the CA tech, though you might consider this a good indicator of what you're in for support-wise from them. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: Re : [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Steve Linehan
Perfomon trace logs will generate the raw binary trace data but it has to be processed.  The easiest way to get at this data is to use SPA which will collect the binary trace data and process it into human readable format.   Thanks,   -Steve   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

RE: [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Steve Linehan
I would suggest taking a look at Server Performance Advisor (SPA), assuming these are Windows Server 2003 DCs and using it to collect and analyze the data for the DCs in question.  This tool combines performance counters and the tracing data that Joe is referring to which will allow you to

RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange mailnickname

2006-06-09 Thread Steve Rochford
We make mailnickname=alias=samaccountname. I'm pretty sure that we started making most of this happen when we renamed accounts a long time ago (possibly NT4/Exchange 5.5 long ago!) because we did get problems if the alias wasn't the same as samaccountname.   We do have an email address matchi

Re : [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Yann
Ok thanks.   When you said "..use event tracing ...", do you mean using Perfmon Trace Logs ? - Message d'origine De : joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>À : ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgEnvoyé le : Vendredi, 9 Juin 2006, 4h34mn 33sObjet : RE: [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging. Unfortunately the logging is v

Re: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange mailnickname

2006-06-09 Thread Tom Kern
Thanks. What about mailNickname? Are there any issues if mailNickname is different than sAMAccountName in re: to WebDAV?   Thanks again  On 6/9/06, Coleman, Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Empirical evidence suggests that he shouldn't be insisting so much. Very few of our users have a proxy ad

RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Exchange mailnickname

2006-06-09 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Empirical evidence suggests that he shouldn't be insisting so much. Very few of our users have a proxy address of [EMAIL PROTECTED], and we have no problems getting to subfolders via OWA. I'm sure you could take a test user account in your environment and duplicate this. From: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread joe
Unfortunately the logging is very basic, it will not log LDAP errors from anything I have seen. This is something I have asked for from MSFT as well, very detailed LDAP logging like you can enable with some of the other directories. Usually I hear a response of use event tracing but I haven't

Re : [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Yann
Good point Joe.   I will use perfmon to monitor the health of my DC. An nother question.   The Web app timed out with this generic error "the serveur is down", where "the server" = mydc. At the time of the web app timed out, i saw no errors about ldap connections between my dc and the zope server.

[ActiveDir] OT:Exchange mailnickname

2006-06-09 Thread Tom Kern
My company wants to use a mail stubing app called "Mailbox Manager" from CA.   I've been going back and forth with the tech there. He claims that, according to him, due to a limitation in WebDAV, one of the user's proxy addresses needs to be in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED], for users to be able

Re: [ActiveDir] SBS and reducing downtime on crash

2006-06-09 Thread Bart Van den Wyngaert
Totally agree on the points said by Susan. Practive is important though, it's even documented by MS and that works just fine. And I use the built in backup, no issues poped up and I had the server up and running in now time!   On 6/8/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread joe
When you change that threshhold you are specifying how expensive you want the query to be before AD reports it.   Changing "Expensive" to 1, according to the docs means that as soon as a query has to look at one or more entries it will be logged. So when you turn down that value, you are tell

[ActiveDir] FW: OT: Exchange OMA

2006-06-09 Thread ActiveDir
Hi,  This is a bit off topic but one of my colleagues is trying to establish if anyone has any experience of the following issue when using OMA.   This is his posting from other newsgroups.  As yet  he has had no response.  I know this list is quite good even off topic so I offered to post

Re : [ActiveDir] AD LDAP Logging.

2006-06-09 Thread Yann
Hello Tony,   Very usefull information ! Thanks. i enabled this config: 15 Field Engineering  to 5 Expensive Search Results Threshold to 1   Here are the LDAP operation, :   1644 INFORMATIONAL NTDS General Fri Jun 09 09:55:16 2006 childdomain\user1 Internal event: A client issued a search operation