To the best of my recollection, there was no way in 5.5 to do what you want
without resorting to serious scripting and programming. The only way to put in
a disclaimer was with third party products, like, I believe, Minesweeper.
That's one of the many reasons that the whole world has moved on
yes, we have no bananas
- Original Message -
From: Akomolafe, Deji
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Remote DC's on Virtual Server
:)
Interesting points, again. Did I remember to say that I am biased? I
/24/06, Albert Duro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could I bother you for a link to your blog? Searching on 'al mulnick
blog mailnickname' (and various combinations thereof) got me all kinds
of stuff, none of which seemed to be what you're referring to.
C'mon, Al, you gotta get over this shyness
Try putting the calendar in Category view, then bringing in the From field.
- Original Message -
From: Dan DeStefano
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:16 AM
Subject: [ActiveDir] Public Folder Appointment Owner
I would like to know how to
Could I bother you for a link to your blog? Searching on 'al mulnick blog
mailnickname' (and various combinations thereof) got me all kinds of stuff,
none of which seemed to be what you're referring to.
C'mon, Al, you gotta get over this shyness...
- Original Message -
From: Al
--------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf
Of *Albert Duro
*Sent:* Sunday, November 12, 2006 10:27 PM
*To:*
] *On Behalf
Of *Albert Duro
*Sent:* Sunday, November 12, 2006 10:27 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] OT: M$
being conciliatory is laudable, but I think you're
missing
being conciliatory is laudable, but I think you're missing the
point. It's not wether anybody is offended or not -- the question is why
does someone come into a peaceful gathering casting offense. Especially
when it's not necessary. If someone deliberately spits on the dinner
table, do you
Maintenance pack didn't do the trick. I appreciate the
help.
- Original Message -
From:
Albert Duro
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 6:56
PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - USB HD no
boot
Thank you, Brent. I have
Sorry to say it didn't work. Whether the boot flag is on
or off on the USB drive, the server hangs on boot-up if the drive is attached
and running.
- Original Message -
From:
Albert Duro
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 6:55
PM
Go to dyndns.com. They'll set up a PTR for you
immediately and cheaply.
Provided you own your domain, that is.
- Original Message -
From:
Technical Support
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 2:47
PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
Thank you, Brent. I have downloaded the Maint Pack, and
will apply it in the next few days. I'll let you know.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:16
AM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT -
the Inactive command to
clear the boot flag Thanks,
Andrew Fidel
"Albert Duro" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/06/2006 09:55 PM
Please respond
t
=)
"Albert Duro" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/06/2006 10:54 AM
Please respond
toActiveDir@mail.act
- DL is just the make, still
need the model and year. :)
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Albert Duro
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 3:51 PM
To: ActiveDir
] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Albert Duro
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 1:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - USB HD no boot
DL380 R03 P2400XEON US
Product #: 257917-001
Thank you, Brian
- Original Message -
From: Brian Desmond [EMAIL
) that is then Foldershare'd to my server at home. This does a
nightly data sync across the Internet.
Now THAT is the poorman's databackup with offsite coverage backup solution
:-)
Albert Duro wrote:
OK, Al. I said I'm willing to learn and you said you're willing to
teach. So let me ask you what you would do in my
Nothing doing. I tried it on a 3-year old Proliant DL. I couldn't find any
USB settings, not in the boot order, not in the boot selections, not
anywhere. It's back to the old switch and bai...er...boot
- Original Message -
From: Albert Duro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir
.
Albert Duro wrote:
Yes, BE does do disk backup. But I have some objections:
A. They don't make it easy, infact they make an unnecessarily
complicated production of it.
B. I started doing NTBackup to disk while (and because) I was still
troubleshooting BE. When I gave up on BE and its
order in the BIOS on those machines?
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Albert Duro
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 10:54 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Backup Follies
Ah, that brings up another
practices for that
behavior. Shops like Susan's likely have it much better. Don't
let drivers and such get in your way to the appropriate solution for your
enterprise is all I'm saying.
On 11/2/06, Albert
Duro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes,BE does do disk backup. But I have some
to ping
off-line if I can be of any help.
On 10/31/06, Albert
Duro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Al, since you ask, no I don't see it differently, at least
not at the oratorical level. But where the rubber meets the road,
things can look very different. Like
and
rule out some of the complexity. Could take a while, but might be worth it.
Al
On 11/2/06, Albert
Duro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why does NTBackup work for me and BE not, when they are at
core the same product?
I wondered about that too. Here are my
thoughts
leshooting
and lack of service. I'm interested if you see differently though.
This area of the business fascinates me
On 10/28/06, Albert
Duro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm sure you and Susan are right. All I'm saying is
that it *can* happen, and for me, why take
machines locally. But there are times when it makes more sense, trust
me.)
-ajm
On 10/27/06, Albert
Duro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've found, with NTbackup, that if you cram two or more
tasks into a backup job, it's very likely to fail. For example, if you do
I've found, with NTbackup, that if you cram two or more tasks
into a backup job, it's very likely to fail. For example, if you do a System
State and a file backup and an Exchange backup in the same job. It's best
to separate each task into its own job, and sort it out in the
scheduling.
A
by any chance, is it possible that there's a live PST in
there, or an attempt to place it there? Users can do that on their own
after all, unless measures are taken against it.
- Original Message -
From:
Antonio Aranda
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent:
I haven't. I don't have that problem with my users
(sometimes I wish they were savvy enough to be that troublesome). But I
vaguely remember something about a reg hack and or a GPO that prevents users
from receiving to a PST.
- Original Message -
From:
Antonio Aranda
chiming in late here, but just want to second Larry's Exmerge
motion. As far as I know it's the only native way to find a message, but
by subject only. I think it may also be possible to turn on full SMTP
logging and do a text search of the logs, but I'm not sure about that, and it
would be
sometimes.. it's the process that counts.
Albert Duro wrote:
I do not recommend Altiris. At first it was great, except for the
incomprehensible report generator. Gradually, weaknesses and annoyances
started cropping up, and then the death blow: a major upgrade that
destroyed itself, the previous
I do not recommend Altiris. At first it was great,
except for the incomprehensible report generator. Gradually, weaknesses
and annoyances started cropping up, and then the death blow: a major upgrade
that destroyed itself, the previous installation, and nearly destroyed the
server. So you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Albert Duro
Sent: 28 August 2006 16:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Printers AD GUI
I figured out where the disconnect is in this discussion. You see, I'm
the sole IT of a small org
guys?)
Albert Duro wrote:
I figured out where the disconnect is in this discussion. You see, I'm
the sole IT of a small org, barely over the SBS size, and I have to do
*everything*. I had overlooked the fact that those of you who are at the
top of a large IT pyramid have to leave
You will note that when you create
a queue, you get the option to publish it to the directory, it isn't
mandatory, not required, it is simply an option
of course, but ONLY if you share them. As soon as you stop sharing them,
POOF
both you and Brian essentially said that yeah printers are
thank you Carlos, I'll give that a try
- Original Message -
From: Carlos Magalhaes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Printers AD GUI
Hello there, have you had a look at the Windows Server 2003 R2 Printer
I have seen that behavior. Your AV is the prime suspect here. Symantec
Mail security has certainly been known to cause it.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Rutherford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:57 AM
Subject: [ActiveDir]
If I were you, rather than put Exchange on a DC, I would put the second DC
on an older but still robust workstation (and beefed up to boot). A long
way from Best Practices, but still preferable to the Taboo Mix.
- Original Message -
From: Steven Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
no debate from me. I was just asking. Thank you for the lesson.
- Original Message -
From: joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Raid 1 tangent -- Vendor Domain
Mirrors don't scale.
Microsoft's
38 matches
Mail list logo
