RE: [ActiveDir] memberOf and member link breaking

2006-08-11 Thread Presley, Steven
r with ADMOD to get additional error info).        joe   -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Presley, Steven Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 9:18 AM To: A

RE: [ActiveDir] memberOf and member link breaking

2006-08-11 Thread Presley, Steven
t; > How long ago did you remove the user? Phantom cleanup can take a > while. > > Thanks, > > -Steve > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Presley, > Steven > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:43 AM

RE: [ActiveDir] memberOf and member link breaking

2006-08-11 Thread Presley, Steven
group reside)? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Onyszko > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 9:25 AM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] memberOf and member link breaking &g

[ActiveDir] memberOf and member link breaking

2006-08-11 Thread Presley, Steven
I have seen this a few times now (Windows 2003 Sp1) where someone will remove a user from a distribution group and it will update the memberOf attribute of the user, but not the member attribute of the group.  The user object is in a different domain then the group if that matters.  It does

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: RUS

2006-06-12 Thread Presley, Steven
You can use userPrincipalName I suppose...perhaps something like (&(mailnickname=*)([EMAIL PROTECTED])).   Regards, Steven From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clay, Justin (ITS)Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:28 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubjec

RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual DCs

2006-06-07 Thread Presley, Steven
Title: Virtual DCs This is absolutely true.  I know virtualization scares a lot of people, but the fact is that in some environments virtualizing systems saves a great deal of money and actually makes managing systems much easier (here it has reportedly saved a "significant" amount in hardwar

RE: [ActiveDir] Error dialog while modifying a mail enabled group (DL) with delegated account

2006-05-22 Thread Presley, Steven
Outlook does indeed let you manage groups if, in ADUC, you tick the check box "Manager can update membership list" and you define a manager of the list (on the "Managed By" tab). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Monday, May 22, 2006

RE: [ActiveDir] [Exchange] Full Mailbox Directory Name holds wrong Administrative Group name

2006-05-21 Thread Presley, Steven
Victor, At first I was not sure what you were talking about.  I've never used this column before (it's not displayed as one of the defaults and I'm used to looking at mailbox enabled accounts via cmdline and now PowerShell), but after looking at ESM what you are really talking about (that mo

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange Cache Mode -Help

2006-05-17 Thread Presley, Steven
Milton, What he is suggesting is that the topic of discussion typically is about Active Directory (although there are a few off topic posts about Exchange).  I think you'll find that there are better lists out there that deal specifically with Exchange (the exchange2003-yahoo group is a good

RE: [ActiveDir] Live Communications Server errors

2006-03-16 Thread Presley, Steven
Since you are not using TLS can you telnet from a client to the LCS server on port 5060? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Daniel Gilbert > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:16 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: RE: [Ac

RE: [ActiveDir] Script to determine a machine's site

2006-02-03 Thread Presley, Steven
Title: Script to determine a machine's site Have you looked at ATSN (http://www.joeware.net/win/free/tools/atsn.htm)?  Not sure it it will work for a machine that is not a member of the domain though.  But finding the local IP and then feeding it to ATSN should not be that big of a deal and t

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware

2005-10-30 Thread Presley, Steven
MVP - Directory Services > www.readymaids.com - we know IT > www.akomolafe.com > Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about > Yesterday? -anon > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Presley, Steven > Sent: S

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware

2005-10-30 Thread Presley, Steven
We are quite a large ESX shop (number of guest OS's are in the 1000's I believe) and while I fought it for quite some time we have ended up using ESX for our 5 front-end servers and our 3 bridgehead servers. Most ESX guest OS's don't require much tweaking, but Exchange certainly does (at least the

RE: [ActiveDir] rebooting a patched, but stubborn DC

2005-10-16 Thread Presley, Steven
Well you are definitely not alone. Something like this just happened to me while patching my Exchange clusters (only happened to 1 out of 18, so its pretty rare). After patching and telling the passive node to reboot it was completely inaccessible even after 15 minutes (normally it does not take