[ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread joe
Has anyone ever actually tested if Exchange properly delivers emails to all members of a large (many thousands of mail objects) Distribution List? Specifically where the Exchange server has to expand a DL and use attribute ranging to get all members. joe List info : http://www.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread Eric Fleischman
T] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Has anyone ever actually tested if Exchange properly delivers emails to all members of a large (many thousands of mail objects) Distribution List? Specifically where the Exchange server has to expand a DL and use attribu

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread joe
ctiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Has anyone ever actually tested if Exchange properly delivers emails to all members of a large (many thousands of mail objects) Distribution List? Specifically where the Exchang

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread Eric Fleischman
5 3:04 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Has anyone ever actually tested if Exchange properly delivers emails to all members of a large (many thousands of mail objects) Distribution List? Specifi

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread Eric Fleischman
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... I should have addedare you looking for thoughts on troubleshooting? Or just asking if anyone has seen this?   ~Eric   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eric FleischmanSent: Wed

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread joe
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Yes. :) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric FleischmanSent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:58 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Seems like you're on the right track. With the message ID and tracking logs, you can back out all of the mailboxes that got the message. But you already knew that, and probably hav

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread Eric Fleischman
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Can you give us some insight in to the problem and what you know so far? Versions of Exchange and AD are also of interest….   ~Eric       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-23 Thread Douglas M. Long
Also, is it a query based DL or not? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eric Fleischman Sent: Thu 3/24/2005 12:42 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-24 Thread Ramsay, Steve
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: 24 March 2005 00:48 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... How do you know it works just fine? What proactive checking is done to

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-24 Thread gcorbett
Quoting "Ramsay, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have personally experienced this issue with Exchange 5.5. It happens very > rarely and we have been unable to reproduce it at will. However, the > problem seemed to start when we enabled site-level journaling (we use KVS > Enterprise Vault for jou

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-24 Thread Ramsay, Steve
ubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Quoting "Ramsay, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have personally experienced this issue with Exchange 5.5. It > happens very rarely and we have been unable to reproduc

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-24 Thread joe
thing was sent at all. joe _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:26 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Also,

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-24 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Long shot, but what are they running for anti-virus on the Exchange servers? There were "unexpected behaviors" with server-side MAPI-based products under heavy load. That lead t

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...

2005-03-24 Thread Glenn Corbett
PROTECTED] Sent: 24 March 2005 11:39 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion... Quoting "Ramsay, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have personally experienced this issue with Exchange 5.5. It