PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 19:35
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade
Cindy,
We were in a similar situation. We did our upgrade on a Saturday morning
advising our users there would be periodic, but short outages as we were
upgrading the domain. As long as one NT4
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade
The issue I had was the problem of win2000 clients only contacting the
win2000 DC after upgrading - I didn't realize it so when I brought the
win2000 DC down, w2k clients could not authenticate to NT DC's. I've heard
that this may have
I finally have a date set for my AD upgrade. It will be in in place upgrade
of our NT domain. I've done this procedure 3 times in my test lab and I'm
95% confident. What I don't know is what impact the upgrade process will
have on our end users accessing network resources during the upgrade
-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade
I finally have a date set for my AD upgrade. It will be in in place upgrade
of our NT domain. I've done this procedure 3 times in my test lab and I'm
) is
better
HTH
Deji Akomolafe
- Original Message -
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:37 AM
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade
I finally have a date set for my AD upgrade. It will be in in place
upgrade
of our NT domain. I've done
PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name
Michael,
Why worry about it? A '.' is legal in a NetBIOS
name, and it's not going to conflict with DNS or LDAP, which Windows 2000 is
hugely more interested in. NetBIOS is there for backwards com
!
But
cool. Thanks for your input (and that of others on the list). VERY
helpful.
-Original Message-From: Rick Kingslan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:50
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name
Michael
Title: Message
We will check this 1st thing Monday,thanks for the heads up.--Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld - Original Message - From: ActiveDir-owner Sent: 06/27/2003 05:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with bad NetBIOS
name would be a nightmare because of the
servers.
I'm
sure that to some folks on this list, that probably sounds like a small
environment. :-)
-Original Message-From: Diane Ayers
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:45
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir]
ke a small
environment. :-)
-Original Message-From: Diane Ayers
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:45
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name
I'm not sure of the scale of your environment. If smallis
t com"
that has succeeded and is still around.
-Original Message-From: Raymond
McClinnis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June
26, 2003 2:34 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name
I dont know that
its s
Title: Message
Migrate, leave that issue behind.
-Original Message-From: Michael B. Smith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:26
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name
I
think you mis
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIOS name
Migrate, leave that issue behind.
-Original Message-From: Michael B.
Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003
3:26 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]S
Title: Message
Ahh,
that's good to hear. One good experience. Any others? :-)
-Original Message-From: Jeremy Waldrop
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:35
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Upgrade with "bad" NetBIO
for a restructure in the end - we didn't like the old domain name much
anyway.
--
Steve Bennett
Systems Support, Lancaster
University
-Original Message-From:
Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 26 June 2003
22:10To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] AD Upgrade
(240156)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD
Upgrade with bad NetBIOS name
I think you misunderstand.
The company's netbios name is company.com
, depending on your registrar. I spent $8USD last time, IIRC.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Machin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade DNS namespace questions.
as far as I can see the name
At $9/year from godaddy.com, it would be silly not to register.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:42 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade DNS namespace questions.
Call it a safety net
We are planning to upgrade our single NT domain to AD and I want to make
sure I understand about how we will name the domain. Currently our NT domain
name is SSD_DOMAIN0 (yeah, I know. I was handed it) and our registered
domain name is santee.k12.ca.us. We are NAT'd behind a PIX and using 10.
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade DNS namespace questions.
We are planning to upgrade our single NT domain to AD and I want to make
sure I understand about how we will name the domain. Currently our NT
domain name is SSD_DOMAIN0 (yeah, I know. I was handed it) and our
registered
: Thursday, December 05, 2002 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade DNS namespace questions.
I have done 5 enterprise sized production
installations/implementations
of AD and have always used the .local dns suffix. AD's DNS does not
need to be globally routable
be. So, can you point me in the direction of your
source.
Thanks,
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade DNS namespace questions.
While there's
, 2002 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade DNS namespace questions.
I would like to see where this best practice rule came from. My
university is using the .local structure because when we begin putting
up AD domains this was the best practice. Right now we
, 2002 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD upgrade DNS namespace questions.
Two different groups (each) at with Compaq Consulting Services and
Microsoft
Consulting Services. I don't have anything that's not company-proprietary
to
share.
I also recall hearing the same recommendation at MEC2001
24 matches
Mail list logo
