RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Strand, Ted
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS We started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD DNS on the inside with split brain. After 2-3 months (the UNIX bind server owners hate everything about Microsoft), and listening to millions of shots about how Microsoft doesn't follow the

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Ken Cornetet
Title: Message http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;275553Product=win2000 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 7:49 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Ken Cornetet
: Strand, Ted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:10 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS We started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD DNS on the inside with split brain. After 2-3 months (the UNIX bind server

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Diane Ayers
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS We've been a traditional BIND shop for many years. When we did our AD migration we looked at possibility of changing our DNS infrastructure for the AD requirements. We tested a few different mixes (all BIND, mix of MS and BIND, all MS) and it just didn't make

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
box, etc. Ted Great Link. Toddler -Original Message-From: Strand, Ted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:10 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS We started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD

[ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Juan Ibarra
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS Hi, we are planning the upgrade from NT to Win2k 2003. Currently we use Unix DNS, the question is should I keep it just make sure it supports NDR records or replace it with Microsoft DNS. Any pros and cons? Thanks, Juan

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Lawrence, Mitchell
)** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan Ibarra Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Hi, we are planning the upgrade from NT to Win2k 2003. Currently we use Unix DNS

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Ken Cornetet
to work. Windows 95 clients do not do devolution. -Original Message-From: Juan Ibarra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:47 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Hi, we are planning the upgrade from NT to Win2k 2003

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Bridges, Samantha
, September 25, 2003 2:47 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Hi, we are planning the upgrade from NT to Win2k 2003. Currently we use Unix DNS, the question is should I keep it just make sure it supports NDR records or replace it with Microsoft DNS. Any pros

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Juan Ibarra
Title: Message OK. I meant windows 2003 AD -Original Message-From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:02 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS If you are planning on implementing

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Free, Bob
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS can someone explain to me what devolution is? Juan Ibarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/25/2003 12:14 PM MST Please respond to ActiveDir

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Free, Bob
- From: Free, Bob Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS can someone explain to me what devolution is? Very basically, if DNS resolution to my.foo.bar.com failed the DNS client devolves the primary DNS suffix (drops