ports: 389 and 38900.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
I missed the part about the ADC then. :)
Try the event
, 2006
2:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
I missed the part about the ADC then. :)
Try the event log - what do you see at startup of the machine? If you
connect to tcp 389 of that machine, what answers? (try LDP and just
t bee run, or at least that is the error message I am getting.
Dan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Ion GottSent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:25 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5
an in-place upgrade of their server.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:38
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
Why are you doing this interim u
, 2006
10:25 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org;
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
The Exchange 5.5 directory should be
listening on another port since it is running on a DC that is already listening
on 389 for AD LDAP operations
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Brian DesmondSent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:38 PM
To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
Why are you doing this interim upgrade when your end goal is a 2k3 native environment?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
possible.
Ion
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Dan DeStefanoSent: Tue 4/18/2006 6:50 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5
Upgrade Problems
We are planning a
complete domain migration and restructuring, but that takes a while and the
client has
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:38
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
Why are you doing
this interim upgrade when your end goal is a 2k3 native environment?
Thanks
: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
Yes,
I can connect to the dc/ex5.5 box from the new ex2k3 member server using ldp on
both ports 389 and 38900. I can also bind using the enterprise/domain admin
account and the ex service account.
I
am
changing it in the server to 38900, but
that stopped mail from flowing.
Dan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:39
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
consistency error.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan DeStefano
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:10 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade
I have taken over administration of a w2k AD domain running
Exchange 5.5. This domain was a mess and it took a lot of doing just to resolve
all the errors in the event logs, but now they are just about all resolved and the
DC/Ex5.5 server passes all netdiag/dcdiag tests.
My current proj
Title: Message
Do you have a white paper on the procedure?
Lynden
From: Adams, Kenneth W
(Ken) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005
4:10 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5
IIRC, IF the folders have
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios TorontoSent:
Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:02 PMTo:
'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5
Has anyone come across an article on how to take control
of public folders if the home
Has anyone come across an article on how to take
control of public folders if the home server is gone?
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] exchange 5.5, active directory and ADC
Nick
Cheers, can you
configure ADC to create any accounts it needs to in a separate container in
the AD?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nicolas
hange
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
From: Chaudhary, Amit
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004
1:13 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[ActiveDir] exchange 5.5, active directory and ADC
Hi
This maybe
for
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas
BlankSent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:11 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 5.5,
active directory and ADC
Correct, suggest since
you haven’t worked with the ADC before that you lab/vmwar
Cheers for all the
info
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Coleman, Hunter
Sent: 01 June 2004 15:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
This is a fat document that is great for
getting up to
, Amit
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
exchange 5.5, active directory and ADC
Sorry
But want to make
sure I’m understanding you here. You suggesting set schedule to never, until the
ADC is inplace and working ok? Then
.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chaudhary, Amit
Sent: 01 June 2004 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
Sorry
But
want to make sure I’m understanding you here. You
aware off adding the ADC in terms of this migration to Exchange 2003
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas Blank
Sent: 01 June 2004 10:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
Yip, the AD container/OU is
Behalf Of Chaudhary, Amit
Sent: 01 June 2004 11:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
Nick
Cheers,
can you configure ADC to create any accounts it needs to in a separate
container in the AD?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
Nick
Cheers, can you
configure ADC to create any accounts it needs to in a separate container in the
AD?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas Blank
Sent: 01 June 2004 10:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chaudhary, Amit
Sent: 01 June 2004 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] exchange 5.5,
active directory and ADC
Hi
This maybe a bit of topic
but I was hoping to get some advice from the list.
I have a Windows 2000
active direc
Hi
This maybe a bit of topic but I was hoping to get
some advice from the list.
I have a Windows 2000 active directory environment,
one of my Windows 2000 servers is running exchange 5.5 (not a DC). We have been
considering moving to exchange 2003, the migration method was to join e
PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5
and active directory connector errors
While
trying to install Exchange 2000 where the active directory is installed.
I keep
getting the following error.
Setup
has detected that the Exchange 5.5 site your server belongs to has not
replicated to the
, 2003 2:15
PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 and active directory connector error s
Have you setup all your connection agreements correctly to replicate
two way from exchange 5.5 to AD?
Have you setup a Public Folder Connection Agreement?
-Origin
While trying to install Exchange 2000 where the
active directory is installed.
I keep getting the following error.
Setup has detected that the Exchange 5.5 site your
server belongs to has not replicated to the Active Directory yet. You can either
wait for replication to complete and try t
d join the Useraccount with "Full Mailbox access" to the
mailbox rights.
After this change it should be stable.
Urs
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Dienstag, 26. November 2002 16:03
To: ActiveDir (E-mail)
Subject: [ActiveDir]
Guys and Girls,
I hope you can help me on this
Microsoft had me update the ADC.EXE from the E2K SP3 CD to avoid my users
mailboxes that were created by the ADC.EXE from losing the mailbox owner
right every few days making me have to go and recheck the box. Now all
users that are created by the A
I need such a beast Please send forth the knowledge.. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Not just public folders!
m: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Not just public folders! If you use distribution lists to assign security to
*any* Exchange resource (calendars, inbox, etc.), it
ECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Jennifer, another thing to think about migrating from Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2000. One of the caviats that you are going to run into is
distribution lists in yo
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Anyone have the link to the "Six Steps" document? I lost my link.
-Original Message-
From: Burns, Clyde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Jennifer - you can do what you need right now.
When one of our satellite offices was still in mixed mode they were
running Exchange 5.0 on and NT4.0 box. This box was also a BDC (formerly
the PDC until AD servers were intr
EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Exactly, but also ...
Before you setup the ADC(remember to install this from the E2K CD), run the
NTDSNoMAtch utility on your Exch5.5 box. This utility identifies multiple
NT accounts that have the same mailbox
tober 04, 2002 1:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
We are currently in mixed mode and cannot switch to native. We currently
have e5.5 and plan to upgrade to e2k next month. (since we aren't in
native, we can't do a migrations usin
Craig P. Cerino
MCSE, MCP+I
Systems Administrator
TIE SOLUTIONS, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.tiesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange
We are currently in mixed mode and cannot switch to native. We currently
have e5.5 and plan to upgrade to e2k next month. (since we aren't in
native, we can't do a migrations using the adc - right?) can i setup my new
exchange server (offline) with w2k and e5.5 and then upgrade to 2000 then
tak
40 matches
Mail list logo
