PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2003 04:04
Subject: [ActiveDir Digest]
-
From: Rogers, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:08 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
One question on
that. Dealing with the GC-Less sites.
I know that
Exchange2k relies heavily on GCs during their day to day processes.
Would perhaps E2k3 be more suited to this environment
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rogers, BrianSent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:00
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Good info
there...answered one of a number of questions I also had...although you did
add
No problem Deji. Glad I could be of service.
-Original Message-
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I profusely apologize
Title: Message
When configuring an
AD Integrated DNS zone, at least one DC in each site should be running
DNS? Or all DCs should be running DNS? Would it matter either
way?
.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:39
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [ActiveDir]
Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
When configuring an AD
Integrated DNS zone, at least one DC in each site should be running
: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I
always configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider that if a location
requires a DC, it also requires local DNS.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems
]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Wow - really - - I
only hae one of my DCs as a DNS server - - all other DNS boxes are not DCs - -
too much going on
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 10:58 AM
.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:16
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Isnt the information
replicated anyway via AD? I guess if they were all
Title: Message
Thats really what I am talking
about - - same site too much chatter.
-Original Message-
From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:16
AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question
: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I see
no reason to separate DNS from AD, except in extreme circumstances. AD and DNS
are both core infrastructure, so there's no reason not to colocate them. It
works well for both our 500 user company and the 4500 user company prior to
that.
My
DC
MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:10
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I was looking more
along
Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rick Kingslan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:23
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
We backed up on the DNS issue. When first deployed,
it was DNS with DC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
We backed up on the DNS
issue. When first deployed, it was DNS with DC - always. We have
since done exhaustive studies that show that the traffic
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I
believe you are correct. Additionally, though, I don't think DNS replication traffic
is all that considerable. The worst data hog in DNS is the resolver cache,
which isn't replicated
Message-From: Roger
Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14,
2003 10:58
AMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I always
configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider that if a location requires a DC,
it also requires
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:11
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
That's really what I
am talking about - - same site too much chatter.
-Original
Message-From: Rogers,
Brian [mailto
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
This would be
correct. But, remember that in the replication strategy for Win2k - data
goes to every DC regardless if it's a DNS server or not - because once it's
DNS-integrated, it's now a part of the AD data
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
This
would be correct. But, remember that in the replication strategy for
Win2k - data goes to every DC regardless if it's a DNS server or not - because
once it's DNS-integrated, it's now a part of the AD data
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rogers, Brian
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 11:53 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
WoahI musta missed that document. AD integrated DNS can now be separated from
, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:26
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
So what is the impact
of placing DNS servers at each remote location? Significant? Or
minimal? (given connections are all greater
PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I'd
expect it to be minimal, although I don't have a lot of emperical data to
prove it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
- MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems
ease times, scavenging periods and
such.
-gil
-Original Message-From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003
10:26 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I
believe you are correct. Additionally, thoug
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:19 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes, you did indeed miss
it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no help.
Hint:
Application partition is
the new partion in E2K3 which
-Original
Message-
From: deji Agba
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes,
you did indeed miss it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no help.
Hint
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 5:50 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I may have missed
something,but the snotty tone seems inappropriate...
In any case, to reduce
the apparent confusion:
GC-less sites have always
that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 2:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I may have missed something
u need to lay
off the coffee J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 7:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I guess
it's my time to say Woah
Gil, my response was
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 7:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I guess it's my time to say Woah
Gil, my response was not in any way directed at you
e
same.
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé,
MCSE MCSA
MCP+Iwww.akomolafe.comwww.iyaburo.comDo you
now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?
-anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Gil KirkpatrickSent: Mon 7/14/2003 2:49 PMTo:
'[EMAIL P
: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:01
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Coffee? How did you know?
My reputation preceded me again :)
In any case, I went back and read my
original post. Flippant? maybe. Snotty, definitely not. As to Gil
Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I guess it's my time
the data into the config or domain
partitions.
joe
-Original Message-
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Yes, you did
Title: Message
No sweatI apologize for my
comments as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Coffee?
How did
: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes,
you did indeed miss it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no help.
Hint:
Application
partition is the new partion in E2K3 which, in addtion to The Domain, Configuration and SchemaPartitions now make up the AD database
35 matches
Mail list logo
