PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2003 04:04
Subject: [ActiveDir Digest]
-
From: "Rogers, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:08 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL
No problem Deji. Glad I could be of service.
-Original Message-
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I profusely apologize for
-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rogers, BrianSent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:00
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Good info
there...answered one of a number of questions I also had...although
y, July 14, 2003 5:54
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
One question on
that. Dealing with the GC-Less sites.
I know that
Exchange2k relies heavily on GCs during their day to day processes.
Would perhaps
morrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joe
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 6:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Hey Deji, slap a smiley face on that post or a disclaimer abo
y, July
14, 2003 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes,
you did indeed miss it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no help.
Hint:
Application
partition is the new partion in E2K3 which, in addtion to The Domain,
Title: Message
No sweatI apologize for my
comments as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Coffee?
How did
e would be no point
in it, might as well just throw the data into the config or domain
partitions.
joe
-Original Message-
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Qu
P - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS ques
CTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:01
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Coffee? How did you know?
My reputation preceded me again :)
In any case, I went back and read my
original post. Flippant? maybe. Snotty, definitely not.
to configure it as
an application partition and replicate the data to specific DCs in the
forest.
-gil
-Original
Message-From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:19 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
i
ulous? Lolyou need to lay off the coffee :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 7:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I guess it's my time to say "Woah..
u need to lay
off the coffee J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 7:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I guess
it's my time to say "Woah"
w.akomolafe.com
www.iyaburo.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 2:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 5:50 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I may have missed
something, but the snotty tone seems inappropriate...
In any case, to reduce
the apparent confusion:
GC-less
st.
-gil
-Original
Message-
From: deji Agba
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes,
you did indeed miss it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no he
deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:19 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes, you did indeed miss
it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no help.
Hint:
Application partition is
the new parti
on lease times, scavenging periods and
such.
-gil
-Original Message-From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003
10:26 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I
believe you are correct
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I'd
expect it to be minimal, although I don't have a lot of emperical data to
prove it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
- MTS MCS
om: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:26
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
So what is the impact
of placing DNS servers at each remote location? Significant? Or
minimal? (given
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rogers, Brian
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 11:53 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
WoahI musta missed that document. AD integrated DNS can now be sepa
, July 14, 2003 1:28
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
This
would be correct. But, remember that in the replication strategy for
Win2k - data goes to every DC regardless if it's a DNS server or not - because
once it's DNS-integrate
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
This would be
correct. But, remember that in the replication strategy for Win2k - data
goes to every DC regardless if it's a DNS server or not - because once it's
DNS-integrated, it's now a part
Craig Cerino
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:11
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
That's really what I
am talking about - - same site too much chatter.
-Original
Message-From: Rogers,
Bri
D
replication traffic correct?
-Original
Message-From: Roger
Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14,
2003 10:58
AMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I always
configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider th
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I
believe you are correct. Additionally, though, I don't think DNS replication traffic
is all that considerable. The worst data hog in DNS is the resolver cache,
which i
gslan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
We backed up on the DNS
issue. When first deployed, it was DNS with DC - always. We have
since done exhaustive studies that show that the traff
Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rick Kingslan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:23
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
We backed up on the DNS issue. When first deployed,
it was DNS with DC
Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:10
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I was looki
27;Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I see
no reason to separate DNS from AD, except in extreme circumstances. AD and DNS
are both core infrastructure, so there's no reason not to colocate them. It
works well for both our 500 user company and the 4500 user company
Title: Message
That’s really what I am talking
about - - same site too much chatter.
-Original Message-
From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:16
AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DN
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:16
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Isnt the information
replicated anyway via AD? I guess if
]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Wow - really - - I
only hae one of my DCs as a DNS server - - all other DNS boxes are not DCs - -
too much going on
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 10:58 AM
To
ubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I
always configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider that if a location
requires a DC, it also requires local DNS.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
S
.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:39
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [ActiveDir]
Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
When configuring an AD
Integrated DNS zone, at least one DC in each site
Title: Message
When configuring an
AD Integrated DNS zone, at least one DC in each site should be running
DNS? Or all DCs should be running DNS? Would it matter either
way?
36 matches
Mail list logo
