to that effect previously but
have not seen anything substantial.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:13 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:43 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
What kind of issues did you have Mark? I have replaced literally
hundreds of
DCs and maintained
a rumour to that effect
previously but have not seen anything substantial.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:13 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, Michael M.
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 6:45 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Hi joe,
If it's not too much trouble, could you list the steps you take
(including
To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Have fun, I have had some great experiences reusing DC names.
-Original Message-
From: Simpsen, Paul A. \(HSC\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:48:53
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE
Don't listen to Dean, he is in denial.
:o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:13 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Sorry about
: [ActiveDir]
Reducing number of Global Catalogs
The issue with IM on GCs is solved in Windows 2003 for multi-domain
forests...
Chuck
What type of experiences have you had with renaming DC names?Mark Parris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have fun, I have had some great experiences reusing DC names.-Original Message-From: "Simpsen, Paul A. \(HSC\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:48:53
: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 5:39 PM
To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Are you going to use new netbios names for the DC's ?.
-Original Message-
From: Simpsen, Paul A. \(HSC\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:07:52
To:ActiveDir
Have fun, I have had some great experiences reusing DC names.
-Original Message-
From: Simpsen, Paul A. \(HSC\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:48:53
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
No we are sticking with the same
I currently have a single domain (w2k3 FFL) with approx 40 DC's. (1 for every site) They are all configured as GC's. I have approx 3500 usersThe WAN connection speed ranges from 512k to 2mb. I read somewhere that having every DC as a GC is unnecessary due to the increased amounts of
:19:06
To:Active activedir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
I currently have a single domain (w2k3 FFL) with approx 40 DC's. (1 for every
site) They are all configured as GC's. I have approx 3500 users
The WAN connection speed ranges from 512k
12/14/2005 11:19 AM
To: Active
Subject: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
I currently have a single domain (w2k3 FFL) with approx 40 DC's. (1 for every
site) They are all configured as GC's. I have approx 3500 users
The WAN connection speed ranges from 512k to 2mb.
I read
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank
AbagnaleSent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 5:19 AMTo:
ActiveSubject: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global
Catalogs
I currently have a single domain (w2k3 FFL) with approx 40 DC's. (1 for
every site) They are all configured as GC's. I have approx
Below is a quote from the WindowsITPro magazine.
If you have just one domain, Microsoft recommends that you make all
the domain controllers (DCs) GC servers so that your network won't incur
any extra space usage or processing. In essence, the infrastructure
Flexible Single Master Operation
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:09 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Below is a quote from the WindowsITPro magazine.
If you have just one
Who wrote it?
*J
John Savill
John Savill is Director of Technical Infrastructure for Geniant. He is a
CISSP, a Security and Messaging MCSE on Windows Server 2003, a six-time
MVP, and a
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:45 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Who wrote it?
*J
John Savill
John Savill is Director
The issue with IM on GCs is solved in Windows 2003 for multi-domain
forests...
Chuck
: Re: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Who wrote it?
*J
John Savill
John Savill is Director of Technical Infrastructure for Geniant. He is a
CISSP, a Security and Messaging MCSE
realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Scott, Anthony
Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 8:01 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
John
Actually I prefer that all DCs be GCsand can't see why you wouldn't
do that globally at this point in time.
Chuck
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing
number of Global Catalogs
Really, how so?
I 'solve' it by insisting that all DCs be
GCs.
neil
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2005
you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Scott, Anthony
Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 8:01 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
John
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:09
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir]
Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Actually I prefer that all DCs be GCsand can't see why you wouldn't
do that globally
No issue.
Thank You,
Anthony Scott
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simpsen, Paul A. (HSC)
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005
2:09 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing
number of Global Catalogs
Let me ask
understanding anyway.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2005 5:14 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
I think John's article is pseudo
: Wed 12/14/2005 8:09 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Let me ask if there is any issue with IM if all your DC's are GC's in your
domain, which is a child, but not all the DC's in the forest are GC's? We have
been refreshing our DC's
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005
2:15 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing
number of Global Catalogs
The IM is a domain FSMO role. SO the only
concern is WITHIN the domain
No matter what forest structure you have for each domain the
following
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Simpsen, Paul A. (HSC)
Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 11:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Appreciate the input, it verified what I had thought. But when I started seeing
Where is Dean, have not seen him on this list for weeks?
-Original Message-
From: joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:10:38
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Yep. Basically the end result is the same, just don't agree
Are you going to use new netbios names for the DC's ?.
-Original Message-
From: Simpsen, Paul A. \(HSC\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:07:52
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Appreciate the input, it verified what I
)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:37 PM
To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
Where is Dean, have not seen him on this list for weeks?
-Original Message
, December 14, 2005 5:10 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Reducing number of Global Catalogs
He is really busy on a contract at the moment. It should be wrapping up shortly
though and after his shellshock wears off he will probably bound back into
action with his
How so?
--Dean WellsMSEtechnology* Email: dwells@msetechnology.comhttp://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 8:15
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir]
Reducing number
35 matches
Mail list logo
