is going to have Exchange server locally.
>
>Regards,
>Mark.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of joe
>Sen
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of joe
>Sent: 07 October 2005 01:18
>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
te is going to have Exchange server locally.
>
>Regards,
>Mark.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of joe
>Sent: 07 Octob
t;From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of joe>Sent: 07 October 2005 01:18>To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Server Roles>>Mylo,>>I pretty much agree with Gil but I don't think most people or orgs have>the slighte
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Server Roles
We had a pretty inefficient model for small site deployment, so we
recently revamped it to the one mentioned below. So far, the DC-less
sites have been quite small, no more than 10 users. However, I'd be
comfortable letting tha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've looked at using Virtual Server for small sites and it
> makes sense to me. The only drawback is that all your eggs
> are in one basket - lose the host and you lose everyth
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mylo
Sent: 07 October 2005 13:59
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Server Roles
Mark,
How many users to site are you talking about in the no local DC
scenario. 10, 20..50 ?
Cheers
Mylo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'
ie the DC deployment decision into whether or
not that site is going to have Exchange server locally.
Regards,
Mark.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: 07 October 2005 01:18
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: 07 October 2005 01:18
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Server Roles
Mylo,
I pretty much agree with Gil but I don't think most people or orgs have
the slightest idea how to evaluate the
way if WINS
failed, things still worked.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Server Roles
As you mentioned, this topic ha
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mylo
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:44 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Server Roles
Hi All,
It's a well trodden path (in these forums anyway) that I'm about to
discuss but I'd like to get our resident ex
: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Server Roles
Hi All,
It's a well trodden path (in these forums anyway) that I'm about to
discuss but I'd like to get our resident experts 10 cents worth on a
rather interesting issue I've run into.. I'm working at a clie
Hi All,
It's a well trodden path (in these forums anyway) that I'm about to
discuss but I'd like to get our resident experts 10 cents worth on a
rather interesting issue I've run into.. I'm working at a client,
reviewing an AD design, where 2 support providers are providing a
migration path
13 matches
Mail list logo
