Dean posted this comment in a recent post:
I have no concerns using Standard edition for DCs, I don't see it too often since the majority of my customers are licensed up the wazoo and use whatever ISO they stumble across first :o)
As
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ryan A. Conrad
Sent: Tue 2006-02-14 16:37
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs
Dean posted this comment in a recent post:
I have no concerns using Standard
requirements may *not* not be met by stnd edition. Try to
ascertain what your future requirements may be, if possible.
neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan A.
ConradSent: 14 February 2006 15:37To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ryan A. Conrad
Sent: Tue 2006-02-14 16:37
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs
Dean posted this comment in a recent post:
I have no concerns using Standard edition for DCs, I don't see it too
mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs
Dean posted this comment in a recent post:
I have no concerns using Standard edition for DCs, I don't see it
too often since the majority of my customers are licensed up
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ryan A. Conrad
Sent: Tue 2006-02-14 17:15
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs
Jorge,
Are you suggesting that some DCs an be Ent. Ed. and some Std.? I noticed in
the matrix that MIIS integration
-14 16:37 To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs Dean posted this comment in a recent post: I have no concerns using Standard edition for DCs, I don't see it too often since the majority of my customers are licensed up the wazoo
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs
Jorge,
Are you suggesting that some DCs an be Ent. Ed. and some Std.? I
noticed in the matrix that MIIS integration/support was limited to
Ent. Ed., as well as pieces of ADFS. We presently have an empty
root (ignoring why
@mail.activedir.org
mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs
Jorge,
Are you suggesting that some DCs an be Ent. Ed. and some Std.? I
noticed in the matrix that MIIS integration/support was limited to
Ent. Ed., as well as pieces
Februar 2006 19:29To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs.
Ent. for DCs
Thanks to all...
We've been aware of the ram justifications/limitations, but don't have a
large enough DIT size (nor do we foresee one in the distant future) alone to
justify the memory limitatio
19:29
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std.
vs. Ent. for DCs
Thanks to all...
We've been aware of the ram justifications/limitations, but don't have
a large enough DIT size (nor do we foresee one in the distant future) alone to
justify the memory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn’t there a different CAL for Win2k3 x64?
AFAIK it is the same CAL:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/howtobuy/licensing/caloverview.mspx
quote
With Windows Server 2003, CALs are no longer triggered based on the use
of certain services but are instead
and body can connect with the universe
and move bits of it about. -Douglas Adams
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Onyszko
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs / x64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't there a different CAL for Win2k3 x64?
AFAIK it is the same CAL:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/howtobuy/licensing/calovervie
w.mspx
quote
With Windows Server 2003, CALs are no longer triggered based
14 matches
Mail list logo
