-Original Message-
From: Grillenmeier, Guido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
agree it's better to replace the 9x clients or install the DSclient on
these boxes
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Renouf, Phil
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Yes, as I mentioned in another post: when Windows 2003 AD came out it
included 2 new security mechanisms
, 2004 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
but as security doesn't seem to be your main worry, you could also turn
off these new settings for the interims until you've updated the clients
to a newer OS or installed the DSclient on them - so you can
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
You really don't need to disable those, you can turn on the (when
possible) ones instead as to not give up security all
-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Ok, it was worth a shot. I have not heard of or seen any tool that will
help you with this. The only thing I can
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:48 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Just one last question before this string goes away:
Has anyone joined a Windows 98 machine to a Native Windows 2003 AD Domain
Client.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros,
Charles
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:48 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Just one last question before this string goes
Hey group,
I'm trying to find an easy way to do a massive migration of Windows 95\98
workstation from an NT domain to a Windows 2003 AD domain, however the tools
that I'm finding don't seem to function, don't exists, or after installation
I can't seem to find a domain controller.
Also, MS seems
: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Hey group,
I'm trying to find an easy way to do a massive migration of Windows
95\98
workstation from an NT domain to a Windows 2003 AD domain, however the
tools
that I'm finding don't seem to function, don't exists, or after
installation
I can't
: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
If you build your Windows 2003 domain with the same netbios domain name
they Win 9x won't care one way or another.
-Original
:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
We are doing a migration from an NT domain into child domain of new AD
forest so we cannot keep the same netbios name. We also have a slight
problem with our naming convention in that all of our DCs
-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
You could potentially upgrade your NT Domain to a child domain of a AD
forest. This would allow you to keep the netbios
]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Upgrading is not an option in this case. Politically its not allowed
and technically its not that feasible either (there is an issue with the
number of Exchange 5.5 environments that are going to be migrated into
the new forest and how
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
How many Win95/98 clients are you talking about? Another question is:
Why do you have Win95/98 clients at all?
Phil
-Original Message-
From
the domain member ship If that is at all possible.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carerros,
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:13 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Upgrading
-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Ok, it was worth a shot. I have not heard of or seen any tool that will
help you with this. The only thing I can think
] On Behalf Of Carerros,
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
We have them for the same reason that everyone else does, economics. If
they still perform their function and can access the network
: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
I think there is more I have to do to get it work with AD though. Don't
have I to make sure that the workstation is using NTLM2 authentication
and
SMB signing? (In which case I still might have to write off my Win95
boxes
because I don't believe
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows 95\98 on Windows 2003 domain
Why would they need NTLM2 authentication and SMB Signing? Is this
something that Windows 2003
19 matches
Mail list logo
