PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2005 11:39
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based
but still has an AD portion...
Quoting "Ramsay, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have personally experienced this issue with Exchange 5.5. It
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
Long shot, but what are they running for anti-virus on the
Exchange servers? There were "unexpected behaviors" with server-side MAPI-based
products under heavy load. That lead t
thing
was sent at all.
joe
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:26 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based
but still has an AD portion...
Also,
ubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based
but still has an AD portion...
Quoting "Ramsay, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have personally experienced this issue with Exchange 5.5. It
> happens very rarely and we have been unable to reproduc
Quoting "Ramsay, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have personally experienced this issue with Exchange 5.5. It happens very
> rarely and we have been unable to reproduce it at will. However, the
> problem seemed to start when we enabled site-level journaling (we use KVS
> Enterprise Vault for jou
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: 24 March 2005 00:48
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based
but still has an AD portion...
How do you know it works just fine? What proactive checking is done to
Also, is it a query based DL or not?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Thu 3/24/2005 12:42 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but
still has an AD portion
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but
still has an AD portion...
Can you give us some insight in to the
problem and what you know so far? Versions of Exchange and AD are also of interest….
~Eric
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
Seems like you're on the right track. With the message ID
and tracking logs, you can back out all of the mailboxes that got the message.
But you already knew that, and probably hav
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
Yes. :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
FleischmanSent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:58 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
I should have addedare
you looking for thoughts on troubleshooting? Or just asking if anyone has seen
this?
~Eric
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Eric FleischmanSent: Wed
n
this list can really answer that question.
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL
based but
elf to see if it was just these two people or more.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 7:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchan
I'm on several DLs that are thousands of users in size(some are multiple
times larger than MaxValRange), and it works just fine. (by thousands of
users in size, I'm talking about a single DL that is thousands of users,
not nested DLs, as that is of course an entirely different test scenario
that ma
14 matches
Mail list logo
