RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication for kiosk machines - straw poll

2006-02-16 Thread Steve Linehan
You can encrypt the password used for autologon. There is an API to do this but it is also included in the tweakui power toy. Thanks, -Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura E. Hunter Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:44 AM To:

Re: [ActiveDir] Authentication for kiosk machines - straw poll

2006-02-16 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
Using Autologon from http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/Autologon.htmlIt hides the password using some windows API--Kamlesh On 2/16/06, Laura E. Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So for those of you that need to put Internet kiosks in placesomewhere in your organization, in a lobby or a dining

RE: [ActiveDir] authentication problem - solved!!

2005-11-30 Thread Katrin Wilhelm
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2005 1:38 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] authentication problem Hi, A) IIS logfiles must have something. The browser pops-up the credentials dialogue when it receives a 401 HTTP status (Access

RE: [ActiveDir] authentication problem

2005-11-29 Thread Ken Schaefer
Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2005 2:40 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] authentication problem Should be error messages in your IIS log files though and if you have a system state backup from before the changes that would have those [or should have

RE: [ActiveDir] authentication problem

2005-11-29 Thread Katrin Wilhelm
for the auditing information - I turned it instantly on. Thanks for the help. Cheers, Kat -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2005 10:17 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] authentication

RE: [ActiveDir] authentication problem

2005-11-29 Thread Ken Schaefer
Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2005 2:40 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] authentication problem Should be error messages in your IIS log files though and if you have a system state backup from before the changes that would have

Re: [ActiveDir] authentication problem

2005-11-28 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
What are the errors you are getting in the error logs? IIS access logs? CRM 1.2 or 3.0? {I'm assuming 1.2 since 3.0 is just out} CRM uses integrated authentication on that web app if memory serves me right...given that its both your CRM and your intranet what IIS changes did he/she make? I

Re: [ActiveDir] authentication problem

2005-11-28 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Employment Training Specialists Australia E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2005 2:02 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication in DOS mode

2005-08-03 Thread Ruston, Neil
Title: Message When in DOS mode, you will *not* have any DNS name resolution - all names will be translated via WINS or NBT broadcast or lmhosts file. Ensure you have an entry in your lmhosts file if WINS is not available. neil -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication in DOS mode

2005-08-03 Thread Hanumara, Rao
@mail.activedir.org'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication in DOS mode When in DOS mode, you will *not* have any DNS name resolution - all names will be translated via WINS or NBT broadcast or lmhosts file. Ensure you have an entry in your lmhosts file if WINS is not available. neil -Original Message

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication issue with Outlook 2003

2005-02-14 Thread Jorge de Almeida Pinto
HI, As I know off clients and servers that can talk kerberos will talk kerberos. NTLM will only be used if the client or the server cannot use kerberos. Are there other errors in the event log? (MRXSmb messages...) 0x29 (KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED) "Message stream modified" This indicates that

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication issue with Outlook 2003

2005-02-14 Thread Peter Johnson
: [ActiveDir] Authentication issue with Outlook 2003 HI, As I know off clients and servers that can talk kerberos will talk kerberos. NTLM will only be used if the client or the server cannot use kerberos. Are there other errors in the event log? (MRXSmb messages...) 0x29 (KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication port

2004-05-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
From the IAS Help file: RADIUS protocol Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) is an industry standard protocol described in RFC 2865, Remote Authentication Dial-in User Service (RADIUS), and RFC 2866, RADIUS Accounting. RADIUS is used to provide authentication, authorization,

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication Problems.

2003-06-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
Title: Message Looking into my crystal ball. You're using downlevel (i.e. pre-Win2k) clients, and have enabled password complexity requirements. This was done after creating non-complex passwords for the users. Either disable password complexity, or reset their passwords to something

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication Problems.

2003-06-09 Thread Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:30 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication Problems. Looking into my crystal ball. You're using downlevel (i.e. pre-Win2k) clients, and have enabled password complexity requirements. This was done after

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication irregularities

2003-02-21 Thread Sahib, Abdul A
Have you created two sites each associated with the different networks. (I suppose it's a routed network?) -Original Message- From: Oluwaseyi Owoeye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 February 2003 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Authentication irregularities I

Re: [ActiveDir] Authentication irregularities

2003-02-21 Thread Marc Zukerman
At a command prompt type set logonserver. That'll get you where you logged in to. If you set up different sites for the two buildings, and associate subnets with each site, the machines will log into their local DC. This is assuming you have W2K or XP clients. If you've got 9x or pre SP4 NT4,

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-17 Thread Ken Cornetet
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:49 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? Jim, I'd like to hear more (and, if others want to chime in, please do) about legacy apps and sec groups. If myproduction environment and experience is corr

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-17 Thread jim . katoe
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/17/2003 09:57 AM Please respond to ActiveDir To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? In the testing I've done, I couldn't get any NT4 API functions to break by using AD in native mode. Universal groups simply appear

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-17 Thread Rick Kingslan
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? In the testing I've done, I couldn't get anyNT4API functionsto break by using AD in native mode. Universal groups simply appear to be global groups. Any inter-domain members and nested groupsjust don't show up as a member. I do

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Craig Cerino
Title: Message If you run DCPROMO on them and make them a DC they will. Which youll have to do anyway or downgrade them to member servers -Original Message- From: Don Murawski (Lenox) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:16 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread EALES, Jack - FPIL
: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? If you run DCPROMO on them and make them a DC they will. Which you'll have to do anyway or downgrade them to member servers -Original Message-From: Don Murawski (Lenox) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Craig Cerino
- From: EALES, Jack - FPIL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:51 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? switching to native mode means having NO more NT4.0 BDC's... that's when it becomes a Native domain - rather than mixed

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Roger Seielstad
There are precious few change to a domain when it goes native mode, the most important being that you can no longer have NT4 BDCs within that domain. It doesn't mean you can't have them in other mixed mode domains, just not in any Native Mode ones. You can have as many NT4 member servers as you

Re: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Kevin Gent
Message-From: EALES, Jack - FPIL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:51 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? switching to native mode means having NO more NT4.0 BDC's... that's when it becomes a Native domain

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Craig Cerino
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? The only way his NT 4 PDCs and BDCs are going to become DCs in a Win2K domain is to purchase W2K and upgrade them. - Original Message - From: Craig Cerino To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Don Murawski (Lenox)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:14 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? Unless I am reading his email wrong - - - He is considering going to NATIVE mode which means one of two things: He already HAS Win2K Srv

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Tony Murray
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? The only way his NT 4 PDCs and BDCs are going to become DCs in a Win2K domain is to purchase W2K and upgrade them. - Original Message - From: Craig mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cerino To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Fugleberg, David A
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? Let me clear upmy question! I have NO 4.0 BDCs, AllWin2k DC's, but have a lot of legacy clients and applications. Switching to native mode, I'm assuming should have NOT impact on these applications or systems

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Craig Cerino
I agree -Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? Correct - there should be no impact. Tony -- Original Message

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Craig Cerino
Title: Message As long as all DCs on the wire are 2k ---by definition - - -youll be ok -Original Message- From: Fugleberg, David A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? We had

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Crenshaw, Jason
-Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? Correct - there should be no impact. Tony -- Original Message -- From: Don Murawski

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Ayers, Diane
, 2003 10:29 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? Let me clear upmy question! I have NO 4.0 BDCs, AllWin2k DC's, but have a lot of legacy clients and applications. Switching to native mode, I'm assuming should have NOT impact

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread jim . katoe
respond to ActiveDir To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ? Let me clear up my question! I have NO 4.0 BDCs, All Win2k DC's, but have a lot of legacy clients and applications. Switching to native mode, I'm assuming should

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?

2003-01-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication ?Let me clear up my question! I have NO 4.0 BDCs, All Win2k DC's, but have a lot of legacy clients and applications. Switching to native mode, I'm assuming should have NOT impact on these applications or s

RE: [ActiveDir] authentication

2002-07-02 Thread Stephens, Brendan
If the user is logging into IIS you would have to search AD for the request.servervariables(AUTH_USER) or LOGON_USER, for a local account. So something like this may work for you: set objUser = getObject(WinNT://Domain/Server/ _ request.servervariables(AUTH_USER)) AdsPath =

Re: [ActiveDir] authentication with AD

2002-05-31 Thread Tony Murray
When you say, create an entry with the userpassword attribute, what sort of object did you create? Anonymous access to the Active Directory is restricted by default. This means that access is only available to authenticated users. You can change this by granting READ permissions to the

Re: [ActiveDir] authentication with AD

2002-05-31 Thread JEHANNO Marie-Amélie
Tony Murray a écrit : When you say, create an entry with the userpassword attribute, what sort of object did you create? i created an entry inetorgperson. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive:

Re: [ActiveDir] authentication with AD

2002-05-31 Thread Tony Murray
In that case I guess you have either installed the inetOrgPerson Kit for Windows 2000 or you are using the .Net Server Beta 3? I don't know much about the inetOrgPerson class, but if you have installed the Kit then I believe there are some limitations with the UI and certain of the Wizards.

RE: [ActiveDir] authentication with AD

2002-05-31 Thread Rick Kingslan
magic. --- Arthur C. Clarke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of JEHANNO Marie-Amélie Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] authentication with AD Tony Murray a écrit : When you say

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication

2001-09-27 Thread Ravenscroft Noah
If you have Auditing enabled on the DCs for login failure it will show up in the security log on the DC. Noah Ravenscroft -Original Message- From: No Idea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir]

RE: [ActiveDir] Authentication

2001-09-27 Thread Allen, Richard
Use audit policies to track them...need to be on NTFS volumes -Original Message- From: No Idea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 September 2001 20:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Authentication When a user/hacker tries to authenticate, failing many times, does Active