RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Strand, Ted
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS We started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD DNS on the inside with split brain. After 2-3 months (the UNIX bind server owners hate everything about Microsoft), and listening to millions of shots about how Microsoft doesn't follow the

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Ken Cornetet
Title: Message http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;275553Product=win2000 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 7:49 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Ken Cornetet
: Strand, Ted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:10 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS We started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD DNS on the inside with split brain. After 2-3 months (the UNIX bind server

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Diane Ayers
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS We've been a traditional BIND shop for many years. When we did our AD migration we looked at possibility of changing our DNS infrastructure for the AD requirements. We tested a few different mixes (all BIND, mix of MS and BIND, all MS) and it just didn't make

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-26 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
box, etc. Ted Great Link. Toddler -Original Message-From: Strand, Ted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:10 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS We started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Lawrence, Mitchell
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS If you are planning on implementing AD, I would suggest using MS DNS. Just to save you a few headaches. On the other hand, I have never heard of Win2k 2003, so I am talking out my ass here. Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Ken Cornetet
Title: Message Here's what we did (names changed to protect the guilty): Our main DNS domain is acme.com. NT domain: ACME We dcpromo'd creating forest/domain acme.acme.com. Now, our unix/bind DNS handles acme.com and AD domain controllers handle acme.acme.com. The unix serveris a

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Bridges, Samantha
Title: Message Has to support dynamic updates. Either MS DNS or Unixas long as supports dynamic updates. We use Unix DNS on outside of firewall and MS DNS on inside. My 2 cents. Samantha -Original Message-From: Juan Ibarra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Juan Ibarra
Title: Message OK. I meant windows 2003 AD -Original Message-From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:02 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS If you are planning on implementing

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Free, Bob
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS can someone explain to me what devolution is? Juan Ibarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/25/2003 12:14 PM MST Please respond to ActiveDir

RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS

2003-09-25 Thread Free, Bob
- From: Free, Bob Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS can someone explain to me what devolution is? Very basically, if DNS resolution to my.foo.bar.com failed the DNS client devolves the primary DNS suffix (drops