Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS
We
started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD DNS on the inside
with split brain. After 2-3 months (the UNIX bind server owners hate
everything about Microsoft), and listening to millions of shots about how
Microsoft doesn't follow the
Title: Message
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;275553Product=win2000
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,
September 25, 2003 7:49 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or
Microsoft
: Strand, Ted
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:10
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS
We
started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD DNS on the inside
with split brain. After 2-3 months (the UNIX bind server
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS
We've been a traditional BIND shop for many years. When we did our
AD migration we looked at possibility of changing our DNS infrastructure for the
AD requirements. We tested a few different mixes (all BIND, mix of MS and
BIND, all MS) and it just didn't make
box, etc.
Ted
Great Link.
Toddler
-Original Message-From: Strand, Ted
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:10
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS
We
started out by using Bind on the external (SOA) and using AD
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS
If you are
planning on implementing AD, I would suggest using MS DNS. Just to save you a
few headaches.
On the other
hand, I have never heard of Win2k 2003, so I am talking out my ass here.
Thank you,
Mitchell
D. Lawrence
**Good|Cheap|Fast
(Pick
Title: Message
Here's what we
did (names changed to protect the guilty):
Our main DNS
domain is acme.com.
NT domain:
ACME
We dcpromo'd
creating forest/domain acme.acme.com. Now, our unix/bind DNS handles acme.com
and AD domain controllers handle acme.acme.com. The unix serveris a
Title: Message
Has to
support dynamic updates. Either MS DNS or Unixas long as supports
dynamic updates.
We use
Unix DNS on outside of firewall and MS DNS on inside.
My 2
cents.
Samantha
-Original Message-From: Juan Ibarra
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,
Title: Message
OK. I
meant windows 2003 AD
-Original Message-From: Lawrence,
Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,
September 25, 2003 12:02 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or
Microsoft DNS
If you are
planning on implementing
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS
can someone explain to me what devolution is?
Juan Ibarra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/25/2003 12:14 PM MST
Please respond to ActiveDir
-
From: Free, Bob
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS
can someone explain to me what devolution is?
Very basically, if DNS resolution to my.foo.bar.com failed the DNS
client devolves the primary DNS suffix (drops
11 matches
Mail list logo