You might want to fire up regmon to see what is causing the setup to fail. I
had a similar situation a few weeks ago and we figured out (*waves at Dean*)
that there was a ServicePackBuild registry entry under
HKLM\Software\Exchange\Setup that didn't get correctly re-populated during the
]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 2k permissions OT
www.venkat.btinternet.co.uk/exchange/Permissions.doc
Microsoft(r) Exchange 2000 Internals: Permissions Guide Paul Bowden,
Program Manager, Microsoft Exchange Server Product Unit
Little old but it covers E2K with a lot of What permissions do I
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 2k permissions OT
There are two permissions papers now.
Working With Active Directory Permissions in Exchange Server
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 2k permissions OT
the first article was great.
just one question- he talks about needing to be exchange full admin on
the org to install or upgrade a server
, December 08, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 2k permissions OT
the first article was great.
just one question- he talks about needing to be exchange full admin on
the org to install or upgrade a server in exchange 2k. do you know if
this means you need
] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 2k permissions OT
the first article was great.
just one question- he talks about needing to be exchange full admin on
the org to install or upgrade a server in exchange 2k. do
: [ActiveDir] exchange 2k permissions OT
www.venkat.btinternet.co.uk/exchange/Permissions.doc
Microsoft(r) Exchange 2000 Internals: Permissions Guide
Paul Bowden, Program Manager, Microsoft Exchange Server Product Unit
Little old but it covers E2K with a lot of What permissions do I need
to do
With or with out a rubber chicken?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 8:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 2k permissions OT
Tom, Bob,
Deji will be covering
One of the better resources I've found for this is Paul Bowden's
Microsoft Exchange Permissions Guide v4.01. I had downloaded it from
somewhere on Microsoft's site quite a while back. I'm not sure if it's
still available, but if you can't find it let me know and I'll send it
to you off-list.
www.venkat.btinternet.co.uk/exchange/Permissions.doc
Microsoft(r) Exchange 2000 Internals: Permissions Guide
Paul Bowden, Program Manager, Microsoft Exchange Server Product Unit
Little old but it covers E2K with a lot of What permissions do I need
to do * QA
-Original Message-
From:
Just wanted to say thanks to all for the comments / scenarios. much
appreciated.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
Same forest different domain should work
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
as a workaround it may be worth to mention, that it's no problem for a user
to edit a DL's (or any other group's) membership simply by using the
find-people feature of the workstation (simply query for the groupname and
if you have been granted write
, October 05, 2003 4:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
as a workaround it may be worth to mention, that it's no problem for a user
to edit a DL's (or any other group's) membership simply by using the
find-people feature of the workstation (simply query
Message-
From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Samstag, 4. Oktober 2003 02:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
That is exactly the problem. The issue from MS is that Outlook uses NSAPI (I
think?) to do the DL management and it doesn't deal with referrals. So
I would like to attack this problem from an AD point of view. Your domain
structure consists of an empty forest root domain with a child domain. This
structure allows you to make every DC in the child DC a GC without much
overhead. The information in the empty forest root should be relatively
I was thinking along the same lines only we don't have some critical
information to make the call... That being what does the replication pathing
look like and how big are these domains/how big will they be/how many
changes going through them. If the two domains are on opposite sides of a
very
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
Joe,
Can you elaborate on this bug, or point me to some documentation?
Thanks,
Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October
] Exchange 2k ?
Joe,
Can you elaborate on this bug, or point me to some documentation?
Thanks,
Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 6:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
I was thinking along the same
Probably a good conversation for an Exchange group as well, but any GC's
over 10 are not going to provide much in the way of value. Exchange 2K
discovery keeps track of 10 of them for it's use and for giving information
out to the clients.
Depending on what you want the clients to be able to do
the requests provide no value anyway.
Al
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
Microsoft recommends 1 GC for every 4 Exchange 2000 servers, with 1 GC
) for every 4 Exchange mailbox processors.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kenneth W (Ken) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
Microsoft recommends 1 GC for every 4 Exchange 2000 servers
;)
-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:36 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2k ?
One more thing, Microsoft says to scale out not up. I guess this is a JET
issue. So 2 Proc Boxes are better than 4
22 matches
Mail list logo
