ports: 389 and 38900.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
I missed the part about the ADC then. :)
Try the event
, 2006
2:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
I missed the part about the ADC then. :)
Try the event log - what do you see at startup of the machine? If you
connect to tcp 389 of that machine, what answers? (try LDP and just
t bee run, or at least that is the error message I am getting.
Dan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Ion GottSent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:25 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5
an in-place upgrade of their server.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:38
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
Why are you doing this interim u
, 2006
10:25 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org;
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
The Exchange 5.5 directory should be
listening on another port since it is running on a DC that is already listening
on 389 for AD LDAP operations
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Brian DesmondSent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:38 PM
To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
Why are you doing this interim upgrade when your end goal is a 2k3 native environment?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
possible.
Ion
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Dan DeStefanoSent: Tue 4/18/2006 6:50 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5
Upgrade Problems
We are planning a
complete domain migration and restructuring, but that takes a while and the
client has
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:38
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
Why are you doing
this interim upgrade when your end goal is a 2k3 native environment?
Thanks
: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 Upgrade Problems
Yes,
I can connect to the dc/ex5.5 box from the new ex2k3 member server using ldp on
both ports 389 and 38900. I can also bind using the enterprise/domain admin
account and the ex service account.
I
am
changing it in the server to 38900, but
that stopped mail from flowing.
Dan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:39
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 Upgrade Problems
Could be all sorts of things here, but lets start simple. Can
you do an ldap bind to the exchange box on port 38900 using the ldp tool (or similar)
from the support tools?
You can’t do an inplace upgrade from 5.5 to 2003 which is
what it sounds like you’re doing when you get the consist
Title: Message
Do you have a white paper on the procedure?
Lynden
From: Adams, Kenneth W
(Ken) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005
4:10 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5
IIRC, IF the folders have
Title: Message
IIRC,
IF the folders have been replicated to another Exchange 5.5 server, you can
specify the home server on that other server. I had that happen to me
years ago, so I'm not positive about the procedure.
Ken Adams
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] exchange 5.5, active directory and ADC
Nick
Cheers, can you
configure ADC to create any accounts it needs to in a separate container in
the AD?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nicolas
It goes through a whole matching process - in a nutshell,
it will match the accounts based on the Primary Windows NT account attribute in
the Exchange DS. There's a whole lot of documentation on the ADC on
Microsoft.com/exchange
for
Diane
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas
BlankSent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:11 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 5.5,
active directory and ADC
Correct, suggest since
you haven’t worked with the ADC before that you lab/vmwar
Cheers for all the
info
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Coleman, Hunter
Sent: 01 June 2004 15:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
This is a fat document that is great for
getting up to
, Amit
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
exchange 5.5, active directory and ADC
Sorry
But want to make
sure I’m understanding you here. You suggesting set schedule to never, until the
ADC is inplace and working ok? Then
.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chaudhary, Amit
Sent: 01 June 2004 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
Sorry
But
want to make sure I’m understanding you here. You
aware off adding the ADC in terms of this migration to Exchange 2003
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas Blank
Sent: 01 June 2004 10:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
Yip, the AD container/OU is
Behalf Of Chaudhary, Amit
Sent: 01 June 2004 11:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active directory and ADC
Nick
Cheers,
can you configure ADC to create any accounts it needs to in a separate
container in the AD?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
Nick
Cheers, can you
configure ADC to create any accounts it needs to in a separate container in the
AD?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas Blank
Sent: 01 June 2004 10:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange
5.5, active
Amit,
Depending on how the accounts were
created, it is possible to use the ADC to match accounts already existing in
AD. If no match is found for a 5.5 mailbox, a duplicate account will be created
in AD. The default matching rule will match the 5.5 associated-NT-Account
field to the AD a
Have you
setup all your connection agreements correctly to replicate two way from exchange
5.5 to AD?
Have you
setup a Public Folder Connection Agreement?
-Original
Message-
From: Rick Reynolds
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 2:06
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
, 2003 2:15
PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange
5.5 and active directory connector error s
Have you setup all your connection agreements correctly to replicate
two way from exchange 5.5 to AD?
Have you setup a Public Folder Connection Agreement?
-Origin
I had the same problem in our enviroment.
The following workaround should prevent you from the automatcally back changes after
you haver corrected the problem manually.
In the AD under the Exchange Advanced Tab go to the Mailbox Rights from the User and
remove the User "self" instead join the Use
I need such a beast Please send forth the knowledge.. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Not just public folders!
m: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Not just public folders! If you use distribution lists to assign security to
*any* Exchange resource (calendars, inbox, etc.), it
ECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Jennifer, another thing to think about migrating from Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2000. One of the caviats that you are going to run into is
distribution lists in yo
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Anyone have the link to the "Six Steps" document? I lost my link.
-Original Message-
From: Burns, Clyde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Jennifer - you can do what you need right now.
When one of our satellite offices was still in mixed mode they were
running Exchange 5.0 on and NT4.0 box. This box was also a BDC (formerly
the PDC until AD servers were intr
EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000
Exactly, but also ...
Before you setup the ADC(remember to install this from the E2K CD), run the
NTDSNoMAtch utility on your Exch5.5 box. This utility identifies multiple
NT accounts that have the same mailbox
Exactly, but also ...
Before you setup the ADC(remember to install this from the E2K CD), run the
NTDSNoMAtch utility on your Exch5.5 box. This utility identifies multiple
NT accounts that have the same mailbox associated with them. In W2K/E2K,
mailboxes can only have one user/account associate
Jennifer - you can do what you need right now.
When one of our satellite offices was still in mixed mode they were
running Exchange 5.0 on and NT4.0 box. This box was also a BDC (formerly
the PDC until AD servers were introduced.
I recommend you upgrade your 5.5 box to SP6 (if it's not already t
34 matches
Mail list logo
