:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
So I did hear a new legal spin on this today from our attorney's. There take
on disclaimers from a legal perspective is that if you are the intended
recipient such that it was sent to you by the sender whether
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
I got a little more information on this from an attorney of one of my
colleagues. The only area that disclaimers have been tested in court
(according to him) is in the case of a lawyer corresponding with a client
bound by the attorney / client confidentiality
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
I got a little more information on this from an attorney of one of my
colleagues. The only area that disclaimers have been tested in court
(according to him) is in the case of a lawyer corresponding with a client
bound by the attorney
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:27 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
You'd be surprised how similar alike we are. In fact, in public, most would
think we're twins except that he hasn't received his cafeteria MVP award
site on disclaimers.
www.emaildisclaimers.com
Brian
-Original Message-
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:18 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
You aren't twins? Could have fooled me. The first time I saw you I
.
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 3:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
So I did hear a new legal spin on this today from our attorney's. There take
on disclaimers from a legal perspective is that if you are the intended
recipient such that it was sent to you
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
Interesting. I think the website makes some leaps in areas. For example,
saying that a postmaster is not the intended recipient is technically
inaccurate IMHO. It's a standard best practice (documented in the RFC's)
that you should include a postmaster, abuse
Probably about as legal as the disclaimer on a fax. Wiretapping is the
illegal part in most cases, but receiving an email that you shouldn't have
received? I doubt you'd get very far. The argument would go along the
lines of, the email was sent to me and because of the way the SMTP protocol
Well I am no lawyer either but the
disclaimer was attached at the request (directive) of our legal team. They
also came up with the content of the message. I have not been following
the specifics behind it but I was told (legal term hearsay) that it was
a direct result of some litigation
] On Behalf Of Stockbrugger, Brian
L.
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:29 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
Well I am no lawyer either but the disclaimer was attached at the request
(directive) of our legal team. They also came up with the content of the
message
: [ActiveDir] Legal
Question
Well I am no lawyer
either but the disclaimer was attached at the request (directive) of our legal
team. They also came up with the content of the message. I have not
been following the specifics behind it but I was told (legal term hearsay)
that it was a direct
, 2005 8:45 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
I missed Deji's post but I'd be interested to hear the legal team's response
to the intended recipient issue if you could post that back. More of a
curiuosity issue, but I'm insanely curious about things ;)
Al
I was always under the impression that any
disclaimer/banner had to be:
-At the beginning of the e-mail
-Only used when necessary
//SIGNED//
David J.
PerdueNetworkSecurity Engineer,
InDyne IncComm: (805) 606-4597 DSN: 276-4597
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stockbrugger, Brian
L.
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:13 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
Sorry I mistyped and meant you (Al) and not Deji - my bad. I finished
reading one of his posts before I sent
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:04 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
Disclaimer (up front) I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice, merely
my educated
Disclaimer (up front) I am not a lawyer and this is not
legal advice, merely my educated opinion.
I think the disclaimer acts as little more than a
CYA. In case somebody who receives the message does something improper
with that information it lets the sender claim that they warned the
This is an interesting/humerous article that ran on the topic in June of 2004
about Time, Inc.'s disclaimer and it's validity.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2101561/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe
Sent: Sat 1/22/2005 2:59 PM
To:
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben
SchorrSent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:04 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal
Question
Disclaimer (up front) I am not a lawyer and this is not
legal advice, merely my educated opinion.
I think
18 matches
Mail list logo
