:25 AM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Brian,
Could you please explain to me what you mean by "save for the browsing
situation, but who uses that anyway?" Are you saying that your
networks don't have browse mas
29.57.777
( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
* E-mail :
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Freddy HARTONO
Sent: Thu 2006-07-13 17:09
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Hi Jorge
Aha, does that happen to be a l
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky Habeeb
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:25 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Brian,
Could you please explain to
me what
lf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:55 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the "Windows Server System Reference Architecture" (WSSRA) Microsoft
states:
"At this time, Microsoft does not support load balan
veDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the "Windows Server System Reference Architecture" (WSSRA) Microsoft
states:
"At this time, Microsoft does not support load balanced network teams on
domain controllers due to potential data corruption iss
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:54 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the "Windows Server System Reference Architecture" (WSSRA) Microsoft
states:
"At this time, Microsoft does not support load balanced network teams on
do
July 13, 2006 1:21 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Can't your spyware just change/delete the host entries again? Or use an
IP
address (or do you configure static routes for the subnets that the IP
addresses reside in that those host ent
>>-Original Message-
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>>Paul Williams
>>>Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 13:50
>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
>>>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed
I think the term is "BAN" in this case. ;-)
On 7/13/06, Jeff Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I don't think the driving factor is the size of the IT operationin terms of # DC's necessarily.
In my small environment (3 x DC, 1 x Exchange, 2 x Fileserver, 1 xSharepoint), the factors are
AIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:29 PM
To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
I've not had good luck with teaming and I've yet to see much benefit. Saying that, I can see where teaming in a failover
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Brian
DesmondSent: 13 July, 2006 1:29 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed
Domain Controllers
I’ve
got hundreds of sites/forests with multihomed DCs. It
s"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/12/2006 04:46 PM
Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
cc
Subject
Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed
Domain Controllers
Not so sure I agree with that. Thin clients work
ju
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Williams
Sent: 13 July 2006 12:50
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
We team everything. It seems stupid not too. Use fault tolerance only
(as opposed to load balancing) and you've got
IL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:02 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Don't mean to hijack this thread but on a similar note - whats the
downside for installing DCs with Adapter Teaming?
All I know is that when adapter teaming is enabled, setting
2006 12:13
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Well, I don't think the driving factor is the size of the IT operation
in terms of # DC's necessarily.
In my small environment (3 x DC, 1 x Exchange, 2 x Fileserver, 1 x
Sharepoint),
transistor radios ... she dreams of
flowers in a field of sunny bungalows"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Falde
Sent: 12 July 2006 16:59
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
So
f Of Kevin Brunson
: Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2006 3:00 AM
: To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
:
: I have definitely found the hosts file to be useful on servers to keep
: them from EVER getting to spyware sites. This guy has a great lis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the year 2006
ehalf Of Kevin Brunson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:35 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
>
> I only surf on the big ones. The small ones just don't catch the
waves
> right.
>
> I don't even
adley,
> CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:41 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
>
> In the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host file entries on
> servers and workstat
] On
Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:36 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Personally, I've never used that configuration for a
DC. Since being bit in the nt4.0 days (before that really, but ha
Title: Multihomed Domain Controllers
That’s fine. You need to do two things:
This needs to be a backup subnet (so no gateway)
In the Network Connections explorer window under
tools>advanced settings, prioritize your connections with this one being
last (this is only necessary if you ne
alf Of *Robert> Rutherford> *Sent:* 12 July 2006 12:57> *To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
>>>> No issues, if you...>>>> Go to the TCP/IP settings of the backup network card, click advanced,> goto the DN
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host file entries on
servers a
On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host file entries on
servers and workstations :-)
Pet
uly 12, 2006 5:06 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT]Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
I know we're drifting off-topic, but I read this and started thinking: laptops. Why bother with desktops?
On 7/12/06, Matt Hargraves <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT]Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
I know we're drifting off-topic, but I read this and started thinking: laptops. Why bother with desktops?
On 7/12/06, Matt Hargraves <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not so sure I agree with that. Thin cl
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006
5:06 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [OT]Re: [ActiveDir]
Multihomed Domain Controllers
I know we're drifting off-topic, but I read this and started thinking:
laptops. Why b
way from multihomed
domain controllers to Citrix and desktops vs. thin clients.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Hargraves
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006
3:46 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir]
Multihomed Domain
I know we're drifting off-topic, but I read this and started thinking: laptops. Why bother with desktops?
On 7/12/06, Matt Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not so sure I agree with that. Thin clients work just fine, require less maintenance and can be replaced in 5 minutes, vs. the 3 hour
Not so sure I agree with that. Thin clients work just fine, require less maintenance and can be replaced in 5 minutes, vs. the 3 hour argument that you'll get if you try replacing someone's desktop because they saved 19 items that have nothing to do with their job on the local hard drive.
Then
ED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:45 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
You surf on your servers?
My servers go to WU/MU...and maybe to Joe's blog for information on
Def
r.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host file entries on
servers and workstations :-)
Peter Johnson wrote:
You might want to then create entries in the host file on the backup
server so that you guarantee that the
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Deji
AkomolafeSent: 12 July, 2006 12:29 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed
Domain Controllers
Susan,
there are still valid reasons for using
hosts
.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host file entries on
servers and workstations :-)
Peter Johnson wrote:
> You might want to then create entries in the host file on the backup
> server so that you guarantee that
rectory Serviceswww.readymaids.com - we know ITwww.akomolafe.com -5.75, -3.23Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]Sent: Wed 7/12/2006 8:40 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir
about Defending Security Infrastructures.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA
aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:41 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain
06 11:41 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
In the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host file entries on
servers and workstations :-)
Peter Johnson wrote:
> You might want to then create entries in the host file on the
.
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Robert
Rutherford
*Sent:* 12 July 2006 12:57
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
No issues
I've never seen a problem with doing this stuff before and there are actually some backup solution providers that recommend using a paralell network for backup data to transmit across.That being said, I think the most important thing for you to make sure that you're *not* doing is testing it out on
From:
Jeff
Green
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:03
PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed
Domain Controllers
Hi Guys,
Many thanks to all that have responded
(and so quickly !)
Points / clarifi
ED]
W:
www.quostar.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent:
12 July 2006 14:36
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Personally, I've never used that configuration for a DC. Since being
Title: Multihomed Domain Controllers
The one gotcha I have seen (only once
though), was that somehow multihoming a 2000 DC corrupted a couple of registry
keys. I think KB 888048 appeared a few days after the 8 hour phone call with
MS. Basically the dc no longer had a DNS name. Needless t
Depends on your support engineers... mullihomed DCs are quite typical to the SBS CSS engineer :-) The KB in the 2000 era that we had tattooed to our foreheads due to our two nic DCs was this one http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;292822Al Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed
Domain Controllers
Personally, I've never used that configuration for a DC. Since being
bit in the nt4.0 days (before that really, but hate to show the age :) I've had
architectural reasons to not do that. Since AD is made up of a
multi-master fabr
Personally, I've never used that configuration for a DC. Since being bit in the nt4.0 days (before that really, but hate to show the age :) I've had architectural reasons to not do that. Since AD is made up of a multi-master fabric, I have had no reason at all to require an isolated network dedic
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed
Domain Controllers
Hi Guys,
Many thanks to all that have responded
(and so quickly !)
Points / clarifications / additional Qs
a) DNS multihomed
issues
Yes, found that in the MS KB about not
Title: Multihomed Domain Controllers
Hi Guys,
Many thanks to all that have responded
(and so quickly !)
Points / clarifications / additional Qs
a) DNS multihomed
issues
Yes, found that in the MS KB about not
"registering this connection in DNS" o
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 07:28:01
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers
Looks like SP1 fixes the DNS issue with replaces a few DNS files -- At this
point Windows 2003 SP1 should be a minimum. Good find -
Chuck
Looks like SP1 fixes the DNS issue with replaces a few DNS files -- At this point Windows 2003 SP1 should be a minimum. Good find -
Chuck
Rutherford
Sent: 12 July 2006 12:57
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
Multihomed Domain Controllers
No issues, if you...
Go to the TCP/IP settings of the backup
network card, click advanced, goto the DNS tab and untick register the
connection in DNS.
Cheers,
Rob
Title: Multihomed Domain Controllers
I'd search around and do some research and testing. A quick
Google search uncovered this within seconds...
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=832478
The browser service is notoriously flaky in multi homed
environments, too.
neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
There were known issues with NT 4.0 with WINS resolution for when WINS packets were lost trying to return through the 2nd NIC using multi-homed DCs. But I've have heard that this isn't the case in Windows 2000/2003. Otherwise you are probably OK but double-check DNS as well per the other email.
Title: Multihomed Domain Controllers
No issues, if you...
Go to the TCP/IP settings of the backup network card, click
advanced, goto the DNS tab and untick register the connection in
DNS.
Cheers,
Rob
Robert
RutherfordQuoStar
Solutions Limit
54 matches
Mail list logo
