Whether a DC registers a particular SRV, which priority it has, which sites
are covered can all be controlled via Registry changes. Whether a DC
registers a particular A same as parent record can also be controlled (at
least with 2003 SP1). So you'll need to clarify exactly what you want to
-
From: Wyatt, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NETLOGON.DNS
Hi Paul
I asked Microsoft the same question as we were controlling SRV record
registration. Read the email below, its an internal process
Message -
From: Wyatt, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NETLOGON.DNS
Hi Paul
I asked Microsoft the same question as we were controlling SRV record
registration. Read the email below, its an internal
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wyatt, David
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 6:32 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NETLOGON.DNS
You also need to delete the netlogon.dnb file as well as the .dns. The .dnb
is the binary version
Were the entries dropped off the end of the file, or were
they missing from the middle? Any pattern to the entries that were
missing?
-gil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B.
Simon-WeidnerSent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:36 PMTo:
May want to check this out to verify this isn't the
issue:
The Domain Controller does not register _GC, _KERBEROS, and
_KPASSWD DNS entries when a Windows 2000 server starts
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/841395/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf
ubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Netlogon.dns
(2)
Were the entries dropped off the end of the file, or were
they missing from the middle? Any pattern to the entries that were
missing?
-gil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B.
Simon-WeidnerSen
: [ActiveDir]
Netlogon.dns (2)
Were the entries dropped off the end of
the file, or were they missing from the middle? Any pattern to the entries that
were missing?
-gil
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005
3:36
, 2005 12:03 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Netlogon.dns
(2)
I would have SWORN
there was an issue in this code path, but the details escaped
me.
So I pinged Steve
offline who remembered the details..basically, its this: http
possible your DC's
already have the updated files via other hotfixes.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B.
Simon-WeidnerSent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:35 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Netlogon.dns
(2)
Thanks ~eric
Sent: Tue 11/8/2005 3:51 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Netlogon.dns (2)
In my experience the behavior noted in the KB was fairly inconsistent. Some
DC's would be fine, but then miss records on the next reboot. The records in
question would also vary
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Deji Akomolafe
Sent: Tue 11/8/2005 4:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Netlogon.dns (2)
IIRC, Guido had his fingers in that KB. I think we discussed the issue
shortly before the KB came out and we
12 matches
Mail list logo
