Noah,
There are two schools of thought here
(maybe more:-):
Run
the DC role on the physical host and the file server in the virtual guest
Run
the DC in one virtual guest and the file server in another virtual guest.
I often leverage (1) but have used (2)
before as well.
Here's a link to a Microsoft document that covers what you
need to do to run a production DC on Virtual Server 2005.
http://tinyurl.com/5enjd
Tony
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Thursday, 13 October 2005 11:30 a.m.To:
ActiveDir@mail.activ
Why do some users have admin access to the file server?
Sincerely...one Admin SBSer.
Tony Murray wrote:
Here's a link to a Microsoft document that covers what you need to do
to run a production DC on Virtual Server 2005.
*http://tinyurl.com/5enjd*
**
*Tony*
-
s [MVP]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:53 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
>
>
>
> Why do some users have admin access to the file server?
>
> Sincerely...one Admin SBSer.
&
all.
-- nme
-Original Message-
From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:53 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Why do some users have admin access
heading? .
Oh-One-Who-Has-SBS-In-Her-Address :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 6:48 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Virtual
ROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 6:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Does it have to have admin rights or can you hack hives and
such to get it to work?
Noah Eiger wrote:
In this case, they run a license server for
___ Neil Ruston Global Technology Infrastructure Nomura International plc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
MurraySent: 13 October 2005 01:12To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers
in Branch Offices
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005
12:48 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Other important factors in this scenario must be the
physical and logical security of the server hous
nger's cat' quandary, now
doesn't it?
Rick
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:01 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers
in Branch Offices
Thanks for the thoughts. An
Host could not authenticate at startup so must it use cached credentials?
Hmmm.
From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:30 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual
Servers in Branch Offices
"Does placing t
Noah Eiger
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005
2:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual
Servers in Branch Offices
Thanks for the thoughts. And thanks Tony
for the reference -- just finished reading it.
Unfortunately, deploying the DC at HQ or
simply authenticati
:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers
in Branch Offices
Right, the Host does not _have_ to be a member of the
domain. However, the white paper makes references to securing the directories
that contain the vhd and the NTDS.DIT (in the DC-as-VS model) for domain admins
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Noah EigerSent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Thanks for the thoughts. And thanks Tony for the reference -- just finished reading it
learn how to do it." - Pablo
Picasso
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Friday, October
14, 2005 2:01 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers
in Branch Offices
Thanks for
nail of some other giant being..." Whoa, dude!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005
12:48 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Other important factors in this scenario must be
] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005
8:42 PMTo: Send - AD mailing listSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
"Does placing the DC inside a virtual machine add any
security? Would it be harder for someone with physical access to compromise
the DC? The white paper
ld be better.
Al
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Noah EigerSent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005
11:42 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
I assume you are refering to the fa
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Noah Eiger
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:42 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
I assume you are refering to the fact that the the host could be compromised over the network and the virtual hard
? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Al Mulnick
Sent: Wed 10/19/2005 6:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Strange, I was just having this conversation today with a co-worker. :)
My thoughts
t: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:42 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices I assume you are refering to the fact that the the host could be
compromised over the network and the virtual hard drive or virtual machineitself
s the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Renouf
Sent: Wed 10/19/2005 8:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Would you put the admin site on a server n
utYesterday? -anonFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on behalf of Phil RenoufSent: Wed 10/19/2005 8:07 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Would you put the admin site on a server not at that location? Because if youwouldn't then
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Yeah, I was just wondering if you saw any issues with putting it on a box
across a WAN link. I have never looked into that before so I was just
wondering your opinion on it for my own curiosity.
Phil
On 10/19/05, [EMAIL
TECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 3:33 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual
Servers in Branch Offices
Strange, I was just having this conversation today with a
co-worker. :)
My
thoughts? I'd say make it a G
ED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 7:55 AM
|To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
|Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
|
|Other than to set up the Virtual instances themselves, you
|will not ordinarily use the admin site to
mon-Weidner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:42:14 +0200
Hi Al,
you don't need IIS running on the machine where Virtual Server is running.
IIS supports the admin websit
mon-Weidner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virtual Servers in Branch Offices
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:42:14 +0200
Hi Al,
you don't need IIS running on the machine where Virtual Server is running.
IIS supports the admin websit
28 matches
Mail list logo
