Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Tom Kern
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Kern Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:29 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) no difference. i get back all the esmtp verbs including the MS ones. In a net trace all i see is tcp

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Coleman, Hunter
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 8:29 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) no difference. i get back all the esmtp verbs including the MS ones. In a net trace all i see is "tcp

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Candee Vaglica
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) no difference. i get back all the esmtp verbs including the MS ones. In a net trace all i see is tcp retransmission on port 25 to that server. i'm sending them about 2,000 emails in my queue but i only see about 3

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Tom Kern
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) no difference. i get back all the esmtp verbs including the MS ones. In a net trace all i see is tcp retransmission on port 25 to that server. i'm sending them about 2,000 emails in my queue but i only see about 3

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Tom Kern
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Kern Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:29 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) no difference. i get back all the esmtp verbs including the MS ones. In a net trace all i see

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
, October 13, 2005 10:29 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) thanks. i don't think they are running mailguard as when i telnet to the server and issue a ehlo, i get all the esmtp verbs including the MS ones. when i try to issue an "xexch50",

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Tom Kern
13, 2005 10:29 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) thanks. i don't think they are running mailguard as when i telnet to the server and issue a ehlo, i get all the esmtp verbs including the MS ones. when i try to issue an xexch50, the server replies

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Tom Kern
] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 10:29 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) thanks. i don't think they are running mailguard as when i telnet to the server and issue a ehlo, i get all the esmtp verbs

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Michael B. Smith
On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 12:03 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) I disabled ehlo on the smtp connector and i still get a full unreachable queue- "connection was dropped by remote host" In ethereal, i get

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-13 Thread Coleman, Hunter
What do the SMTP conversation and network traces look like from their side? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 10:03 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) I disabled ehlo

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-12 Thread Tom Kern
recip policies with journaldomain.com by any chancedid you? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:41 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) Both

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-12 Thread Coleman, Hunter
@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) Both servers are exchange 2k The conversation goes something like this- ehlo mail from: rcpt to: on my mailserver's side. all these get 250 smtp response codes from the journal

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-12 Thread Tom Kern
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 6:04 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) its 2 seperate orgs. that seems to be about 2 servers in the same org. i think the issue rests

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-11 Thread Tom Kern
Backups!™ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:10 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) ok, it goes like this- i work for a finanical corp so we have to stay in compliance. i

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-11 Thread Derek Harris
in their domain string, unless you specifically set them up that way. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:48 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) I may regret asking this, but recall I

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-11 Thread Tom Kern
: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) I may regret asking this, but recall I don't know squat about Exchange message routing. Why do you need a connector? If the name is resolvable from your server, it doesn't seem like it should need anything special to get to it. joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-11 Thread Tom Kern
: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) I may regret asking this, but recall I don't know squat about Exchange message routing. Why do you need a connector? If the name is resolvable from your server, it doesn't seem like it should need anything special to get to it. joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-11 Thread Al Mulnick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of joeSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:48 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) I may regret asking this, but recall I don't know squat about Exchange

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-11 Thread Tom Kern
contact and doesn't have both an internal and an external address (primary of course). -ajm -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:30 AMTo: activedirectorySubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-11 Thread Al Mulnick
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:41 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) Both servers are exchange 2k The conversation goes something like this- ehlo mail from: rcpt to: on my

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread ActiveDirectory
You should be able to just do domain.com and it will pick up any child domains, unless you have a child that needs special priveledges. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom KernPosted At: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:28 PMPosted To:

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Tom Kern
thats because this addy has special needs. its a journal contact that needs to be routed out a dedicated connector to a journal server. i still don't understand why exchange rewrites the address to domain.com instead of servername.domain.com. thanks On 10/10/05, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Michael B. Smith
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) thats because this addy has special needs. its a journal contact that needs to be routed out a dedicated connector to a journal server. i still don't understand why exchange rewrites the address to domain.com instead

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
:33 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) thats because this addy has special needs. its a journal contact that needs to be routed out a dedicated connector to a journal server. i still don't understand why exchange rewrites the address to domain.com

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Tom Kern
PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Kern Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:33 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) thats because this addy has special needs. its a journal contact that needs to be routed out a dedicated connector

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
, October 10, 2005 5:10 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT) ok, it goes like this- i work for a finanical corp so we have to stay in compliance. i have 2 smtp connectors- one goes to a compliance server, the other to an journal host. for the journal