/stream in the
chain.
Why was it that the test failed? let me take a look at the test.
--arjuna
On 11/9/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks guys.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-283
On 11/8/06, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah that would be a good
If you think the 'right' way is to have skin/customSkin.css work instead
+1 for having skin/customSkin.css to work.
then I could do this:
when I get each trinidad-skins.xml in a jar, I get a path like this:
/C:/TestJarTwo/forthebirds.jar!META-INF/trinidad-skins.xml
I could strip out the part
also use URL(URL base, String cssFileName) to construct the path rather
than parsing the string yourself.
On 11/13/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think the 'right' way is to have skin/customSkin.css work
instead
+1 for having skin/customSkin.css to work.
then I
the other alternative is to declare the css file name to be globally unique
like a java class name.
On 11/13/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also use URL(URL base, String cssFileName) to construct the path rather
than parsing the string yourself.
On 11/13/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon
PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't it be BidiMap? Not BidiHashMap?
-- Adam
On 11/8/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-282
--arjuna
On 11/8/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, can I call this method getInvertedMap?
MapV,K
thanks guys.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-283
On 11/8/06, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah that would be a good idea.
On 11/9/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, it'd be good to fix all those.
-- Adam
On 11/8/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL
the
public API dependency, but adds an implementation
dependency.
I don't know, though, if it's worth adding the
dependency on commons-collections for this
one feature.
-- Adam
On 10/27/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
underlying storage is HashMap.
I just found
Also, can I call this method getInvertedMap?
MapV,K BidiHashMapK,V.getInvertedMap()
?
On 11/8/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, since we can't use the commons-collections, let's make ValueMap
public.
I was going to call it ReverseHashMap,
but since BidiMap seems to be more
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-282
--arjuna
On 11/8/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, can I call this method getInvertedMap?
MapV,K BidiHashMapK,V.getInvertedMap()
?
On 11/8/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, since we can't use the commons
/jira/browse/ADFFACES-270
On 10/30/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just saw that.
thx!
On 10/29/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uploaded a patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-270
On 10/25/06, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
The public class:
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.util.Base64OutputStream
is annoying me.
1. it has a finish() method instead of a close() method.
2. it doesn't have a close() method at all. It should have one that
delegates to the
underlying Writer
3. it doesn't have a flush() method that
Sometimes, when people use complete client-side state saving, or they
passivate the HttpSession, they get a NotSerializableException thrown while
Serializing the component state tree.
Usually the cause is user error - the user did not use a ValueBinding
to bind to some
unSerializable object.
It
Usually method deprecation is done like:
/**
* @deprecated use the foobar method instead
*/
public void foo()
In addition , do we have to do:
/**
* @deprecated use the foobar method instead
*/
@Deprecated
public void foo()
??
code in UIXTreeTable and utilities
such
as
HierarchyUtils to handle a null focusRowKey (long-term)
On 10/30/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to moving the defaulting code to the renderer.
However
+1 to moving the defaulting code to the renderer.
However, the renderer must call setFocusRowKey on the component with the
default value, so that
decode/validate/update will work correctly.
if the focusRowKey is null upon postback, it could cause errors during
decode.
--arjuna
On 10/30/06, Adam
already has such a dependency.
I don't know, though, if it's worth adding the
dependency on commons-collections for this
one feature.
Does it make a difference if the trinidad-impl package already depends on
this?
--arjuna
-- Adam
On 10/27/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
actually, i take that back.
It appears that trinidad-impl does not use commons-collections any more.
--arjuna
On 10/27/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I've no problem with using commons-collections internally,
I'm very
-1 from me too.
--arjuna
On 10/26/06, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, as far as I know, you cannot move web.xml so you can add a
specification to that list and there's also the service provider standard
that requires META-INF/services if I'm not mistaken.
Trinidad cannot be used
I like the name
DateRestrictionValidator
--arjuna
On 10/26/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to the validator.
Would definitely hope for client-side validation too!
A tricky question from an API standpoint, though: for an inputText, you'd
just add this validator. But for
Can you describe what type the three invalid attributes are?
--arjuna
On 10/25/06, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to add a new validator. My proposed name is
DateRestrictionValidator, other suggestions welcome. This would support
attributes like:
invalidMonths -
I like #2 because:
1. no new public apis.
2. correct behaviour out-of-the-box
3. we won't get into a weird state where locale is english_uk, but someone
programmatically sets formatting locale to english_us.
--arjuna
On 10/23/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arash,
On 10/24/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like #2 because:
1. no new public apis.
Maybe I didn't explain #2: in either case, we have a new public
API. There's no way to add this feature without adding a public API
indefinitely (note that it grew
indefinitely for these components, even before issue 210 was fixed).
--arjuna
On 10/16/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a few minor changes to this as reported on
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-210
On 10/15/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL
I made a few minor changes to this as reported on
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-210
On 10/15/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-210
with this discussion and a patch.
let me know what you think.
On 10/9/06
+1 to use just disabled and to drop readOnly
On 10/16/06, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 thoughts about this.
1] I think navPane and breadcrumbs clearly only need 1 attribute. I
actually thought they basically treat readOnly and disabled the same.
2] I can't think
the number of rows to display per page, and whether or not you want the
paging controls all the time are two separate things that should not be
bundled into one attribute.
I like Adam's proposal for a skinning property to control the latter.
--arjuna
On 10/13/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you're right.
I could have sworn that we were special-casing the required-validator; I
even looked at the code in the old
corporate repository, but this bug exists there.
--arjuna
On 10/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
please take a look at MYFACES-1467 which is
table, String
clientRowKey);
and UIXCollection has:
public String getClientRowKey()
public void setClientRowKey(String clientKey)
protected final ClientRowKeyManager getClientRowKeyManager()
Let me know your thoughts and I can start on this implementation.
--arjuna
On 10/7/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon
sorry, that last method has to be public (Renderer needs access to it during
encodeBegin to do pruning).
so UIXCollection has:
public String getClientRowKey()
public void setClientRowKey(String clientKey)
public final ClientRowKeyManager getClientRowKeyManager()
On 10/9/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon
I decided to call this
ClientRowKeyManager:
public String getClientRowKey(FacesContext, UIComponent table, Object
rowKey);
public Object getRowKey(FacesContext, UIComponent table, String
clientRowKey);
what d'ya think?
On 10/4/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're having
after this is checked in, I want to start a new thread to rename
UIXCollection.get/setCurrencyString to
UIXCollection.get/setClientRowKey
does this make sense?
On 10/7/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to call this
ClientRowKeyManager:
public String getClientRowKey
I agree with Adam,
I think an Exception while calling any of the methods on ValueBinding
(except for the setValue method) should be considered a bug in the
application and logged at
level WARNING.
And in this case, we should return true
to indicate that the binding is readOnly (opt for the more
getRowKeyManagingRenderer()
hook up on UIXCollection that provides this?
But after reading that second paragraph, I'm starting to
doubt my first - maybe renderers won't always be
the only way to hook this in, so it shouldn't have Renderer
in the name?
-- Adam
On 9/29/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED
in place.
--arjuna
On 9/29/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-209
On 9/26/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I will file a JIRA issue for this and fix it this weekend.
On 9/25/06, Alexander Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
The customized treeTable support might be much much more important,
when all of the renderer api overhauls are done.
can you nail this issue into Jira?
Thanks!
Matthias
On 9/22/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Currently the UIXCollection class (which is the super class
model.
which do you think we should do?
--arjuna
On 9/29/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-210
On 9/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for the delay.
Not sure if I got it completely, but your suggestion to move
dataModelClass)
--arjuna
On 9/27/06, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added some comments inline
On 9/27/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
So I feel a little unhappy with putting things like label/readOnly
(which
are UI properties),
visited/selected/disabled/outcome (which
or corresponding renderer?
--arjuna
However it would indeed requires some changes for
UIComponent attribute autobinding.
On 9/27/06, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Arjuna,
On 9/27/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
thanks for your reply.
Could
ah, I see. makes sense,
--arjuna
On 9/25/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The preferred solution
is making sure that we can simply cache the original UIViewRoot
itself. But simply saving and restoring sufficient state
ok, I will file a JIRA issue for this and fix it this weekend.
On 9/25/06, Alexander Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two solutions for same problem breacks togewer :-)
I have overriede UIViewRoot due to same problem, for keep evens queue (
also as uniqueId counter etc ) in own request-scope
ok, I will file a jira.
inputText should act as
outputText and produce same output. And if not there must be a good
reason for this.
Btw. tomahawk uses behavioral interface DisplayValueOnlyCapable for
this.
Martin
Arjuna Wijeyekoon píše v Po 25. 09. 2006 v 18:02 -0700:
Martin,
why does it matter that these components
hi,
anyone like to comment on this? feel free :)
--arjuna
On 9/22/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Currently the UIXCollection class (which is the super class for
table/tree/treeTable) maintains a mapping between
Object rowkeys and String tokens.
see
private
is this IE 6 or IE 7?
On 9/23/06, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
As you might know, IE has some problems with composite selectors
(.something.somethingElse for example, but more commonly
.af_train_stop.p_AFVisited). With process train the most important issue
it
yield is
Does anyone mind if I make the following method in
UIXComponentBase protected?
It is a method that component extensions (and components in other packages)
would find very useful.
It is used to deliver a faces event to a method binding listener, as in the
following:
tr:commandButton
?
-- Adam
On 9/22/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone mind if I make the following method in
UIXComponentBase protected?
It is a method that component extensions (and components in other
packages)
would find very useful.
It is used to deliver a faces event to a method
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-190
On 9/22/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fine with me. I'll file a jira
On 9/22/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm, but it's event-specific (takes a FacesEvent, deals
with AbortProcessingException) so something like
+1
will help solve problems with trees,tables and other stamping components,
since now the same logic that
walks the tree on encode can do the same walk for decode,validate and
update.
--arjuna
On 9/22/06, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Winer wrote:
Trinidad has a
filed issue and uploaded patch.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-179
On 9/15/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really like the idea of testing for a null rendererType.
My vote would be to just do that and add no public api.
I think that the self-rendering
.
Can you nail this issue / improvement to jira, that it doesn't get
lost?
-Matthias
On 9/15/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,.
Some components, like switcher and iterator, do not (or need not)
render any
content themselves.
This causes problems when
+1 Trinidad
51 matches
Mail list logo
