Other server is related not to copy pool but to the device class. You have
only to define second pool over same devclass.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL P
Of course, cleaner tape is present in library inventory, I have checked it
with CHECKIN LIBVOLUME library SEARCH=BULK STAT=CLEANER CLEANINGS=50 ... I
think it is OK.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Stapleton
Sent: Tuesday,
Sure, my cleaning cartridge is labeled CLNI64L1 ... and it is in library
inventory. My premise was using of TSM automated cleaning method with
CLEANFREQ=ASNEEDED. This way I can track number of clenanings left on
cartridge. In case of library-automated method (you mentioned Zlatko), can I
track th
Many customers have installed TSM 5.1. I have been involved with one
install personally.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX 5L, SAN, Shark
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (415) 215-0326
-Original Me
definitely NO (if you are not talking about NT v0.357 :)
You can have more interfaces limited by number of slots and maximum number
of particular adapter combinations supported by the HW
platform/drivers/OS.
TSM does not deal with SCSI direct but through OS and drivers. NT 4 does
not limit to only
Estarei ausente do escritório a partir de 04/06/2002 e não retornará até
07/06/2002.
Estou no Brasilia, responderei à sua mensagem quando retornar.
Thanks,
an additional question before setting up the configuration :
second copy-pool with same device-class means that the data physically go to
the same tape-pool on the other server, because it works with the default
management-class for that server ( where the pool name is defined). Is this
c
If you read carefully library maintenance manual you would find that
library requires a cartridge with specific label (starting with CLNI, i.e.
CLNI39 is the one I've used last week) and performs cleaning
automatically. So set CLEANFREQ=NONE as Mark pointed. Those of you WITH
3584 may have overloo
Sorry,
I forgot to say, we run TSM 4.1.4 on AIX 4.3.
In that version 'migprocess' is not a valid option for copy-pools.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Mark Stapleton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Dienstag, 4. Juni 2002 21:09
> An: [EMAIL PROTECT
Yes, it works the same way unless you have open zoning.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Fought,Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple HBA Configuration on
Hi all,
l have a storage pool can't peform the reclamation. It just only can use the
"move data" command to manually reclaim the tape. How can l solve this problem?
Max
> I'm trying to back up only 4 dump files from MS SQL server through TSM
> 3.7. When the client scheduler started, there was an error message
> 'protocol violation...' I checked TCP/IP setting and it looked OK.
>
> My question: Did this happen because I didn't install TDP for MS SQL? We
> thought
Becky,
I've had similar experience. We send about 100 GB / day to our 3583 (4
drives). As far as I know no drive has ever cleaned itself. The library
has been in service since last October. But in general, drive cleanings
are rare on our system. We have a mix of 3570, LTO, and DLT media and
We have a user asking if it's possible to run a TSM client on Linux on a
PowerPC. Has anyone figured out a way to do this? Anyone from IBM care to
comment on whether this is being considered or not? Thanks.
--
Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757
747 Rhodes Hall, Cornell U
The fix is currently planned for the fall (September/October-ish).
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question
Is this a true statement?
"You can have multiple Tivoli SM servers but only two SCSI interfaces per
TSM NT server."
Kevin Fletcher
I did audit libr 3575-L12 checkl=barcode.
q libvol still shows me a data cartridge (the volume name, not status!),
but in real life this is a cleaner:
Tapeutil: (abnormal is not an issue)
Slot Address 50
Slot State . Abnormal
ASC/ASCQ ... 3003
Media
Hi all,
today we have two servers connected via server-to-server. Both server have
defined their copy-pool on the other server.
I would like to split the copy-pool into two different ones. Reason is to
run stg-pool-backups in more than one session parallel..
Does anybody know, if this is possible
Hi, TSMers,
I'm trying to back up only 4 dump files from MS SQL server through TSM
3.7. When the client scheduler started, there was an error message
'protocol violation...' I checked TCP/IP setting and it looked OK.
My question: Did this happen because I didn't install TDP for MS SQL? We
though
I have several schedules that I run Tuesday through Saturday
To backup Monday through Friday's data after midnight.
for a work around, I run the following macro each Friday morning, after the backups
have run.
update schedule type=client dayofweek=saturday
update schedule type=client dayofwe
Nope.. been a longtime annoyance of mine personally.. because you have to
setup 3 schedules for DB backups..
e.g.
schedule 1 - full backup on Saturday
schedule 2 - incremental backup on Sunday
schedule 3 - incremental backup on weekdays
Or in your case, 2 schedules
Schedule 1 - backup weekdays
Do an Audit Libr, first, just to see what happen?
Rosa
Zbigniew Borgosz
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: 3575-L12 messup
Dist Stor
Manager"
We are doing something similar here... our FC drives are connected
through a McData switch. The tape drives have to be "zoned" before
they can be seen... any thing like that with the Brocade Switch?
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth T Hymes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04
Did you run config manager or smitty to configure the drives? If so, what
do the configurations look like?
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth T Hymes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:18 AM
To: [EM
Is anyone aware of known degraded performance when backing up Microsoft Cluster
Servers? This data is going to TSMv413 on S/390 where there is no activity during the
time of backup. Why so long?
There is nothing to indicate where the hold up is in any of our logs (both client and
server). An
Does this apply to 5.1.1 client?
Any estimate when a fix will be available?
Thanks,
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-
From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: W2K Active Directory backup and edb000
Just do a delete volume discarddata=yes
The tapes will go scratch.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Pilgram
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: delete data
Hi
I would like to know if it is possible to setup a scheduler to run from
monday to saturday. As far as I know, weekday is "monday to friday", and
weekend is "saturday and sunday". Is this possible ?
Thanks a lot
Luciano
Ruksana,
there is no simple answer, it depends.
If you make two backups to a primary pool and just send one set of tapes
off-site it would expire.If you backup primary pool to copypool it is
same.
One method to retain "forever" first backup and expire next one (with
consequent ones) is to use two
I have had the same concern. I also have had two drives replaced because
tapes were stuck. It is an interesting theory...instead of fixing the drive
when a tape is stuck they just replace it. Definitely different from the
3590s.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Kauffman, Tom [mailto:[EMA
Hi!
What am I supposed to do with tsm 4.2 configuration, after I swapped the
media in 3575-l12?
I tried checkin libvol, but it doesn't reflect the changes (in slot
position i.e.)
Do I have yo checkout everything and recheckin? It takes too much
time...
Is there a method to refresh the media positi
If using a DIRMC, does anyone know at what point the directory object data
starts spilling out of the TSM DB and into the storage pools?? I saw some
discussion on this on adsm.org, but didn't run across any specifics.
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte
Hello, colleagues,
I've spotted that some of you tried bare metal restore of windows machines
and succeeded. Could you share some how-to or important point not to miss?
I installed win2000 to a small partition of a new drive (D:) and then made
a systemobject restore and \\machine\c$ resto
Thanks for your answer!
So what is the value "SDLTC" in device class "DLT" for? Probably to choice
between compression/nocompression - right? Because of the hardware/os
combination the TSM device driver is used - IT is a Tivoli TSM thing! No
one having the same problem?
Cherrs,
Timo Kilchenma
Arnaud,
Yes, you have doubled your copypool copies. And yes, you know the answer -
you can delete safely volumes from "old" copy pool if it was used to
backup ONLY primaryA pool. WARNING: if you have backed up more than one
primary pool chain (!) to same copy pool and only one chain is backed to
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
PAC Brion Arnaud
> I would like to know if it is possible to share directly attached
> FC Ultrium drives in a 3584 library, between multiple TSM
> servers, without using the 3584 library sharing feature. This
> would mean a dynam
Does this apply to 3583's (or just 3584's). On our 3583 "autoclean" is
disabled and I don't see any way to enable it. When I've asked IBM h/w
support they said it can't be enabled for 3583 and that you should use host
cleaning (ie library will tell TSM when to clean.)
We've been running a 3583
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christoph Pilgram
> today we have two servers connected via server-to-server. Both server have
> defined their copy-pool on the other server.
> I would like to split the copy-pool into two different ones. Reason is to
> run stg-p
Hey TSM'ers,
I recently brought 3 new Netware 6 servers onto my network and have been
experiencing intermittent hard locks during Backups and Restores.
I was wondering if anyone else has experienced this problem with Netware 6
and DSMC client 5.1. I've installed support pack 1 as well as the TCP/
Has anyone yet upgraded to version 5.1 on AIX 4.3.3? If so please let us know your
experiences. We are considering going to 5.1 to utilize NDMP for a EMC Celerra.
Regards,
Charles
You can compress the objects.
-Mensagem original-
De: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Em nome de
Wholey, Joseph (TGA\MLOL)
Enviada em: terga-feira, 4 de junho de 2002 09:39
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Microsoft cluster servers yet again
Is anyone aware of known de
Hi all,
I have a incremental backup schedule job. After i rebuild TSM database because
the disk crash, the time take for this backup job form 10 minutes to 3 hours.
How did it happen?
Max
Mark Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Tomá¹ Hrouda
> > one of LTO 3583 (2 drives) we take care of still didn't clean
> > drives. It is
> > operate from january 2002 and there is about 10-20 GB daily data flow
> > throug
Hi *SMers,
I've trying to figure something out using select-statements. I want to know
what events did or didn't complete succesfully for, say, the last 24 hours.
I'm getting the results, but I only get the results since last midnight. How
do I get the results from the last 24 hours.
This is wha
Got to admit I've been wondering about this myself. I've a 3584 library with
10 LTO drives that has been in service since September of last year. I've
got three cleaning tapes in the library, I move 130 GB of data per day --
and I haven't seen a cleaning tape used yet. I know the drives and tapes
You have to do two schedules, one for weekdays, one for Saturday only,
I don't think there is way within TSM you can do in one job. Otherwise,
you have to schedule outside the TSM, using AT on NT or win2k, Crontab
on AIX to handle the schedule.
Rosa
Luciano Ari
New install of TSM 5.1, running on AIX 4.3.3. We have four HBA's Emulex
LP9002l's,
two configured to CLARRion storage for Database, Recovery Log and Disk
Storage Pool. The other two HBA's are going to a Brocade switch's where
there are 8 9940 STK Fiber drives. We cannot see/configure the tape
On 4 Jun 2002 at 10:02, Luciano Ariceto wrote, in part:
> I would like to know if it is possible to setup a scheduler to run from
> monday to saturday. As far as I know, weekday is "monday to friday", and
> weekend is "saturday and sunday". Is this possible ?
I think it's strange this seems not p
I am also reading and writing 150GB of data veryday to 3 drives for about 6
months. I havent
seen any cleaning cartd. is used.
regards,
Burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04.06.2002 17:09
Please respond to ADSM-L
--> ... in these days where disk space is not much more expensive than tape space.
I would disagree on part. LTO is sligthly better than disks when measured
in TB/sq.m. but does not require those many kVAs disks need. Disks require
about 30W/drive + some extra for controllers, etc. Also this elec
Hi Gurus,
I would like to know if it is possible to share directly attached FC Ultrium drives in
a 3584 library, between multiple TSM servers, without using the 3584 library sharing
feature. This would mean a dynamic drive allocation, same style as DDS feature in
Legato's Networker.
Thanks in
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Tomáš Hrouda
> one of LTO 3583 (2 drives) we take care of still didn't clean
> drives. It is
> operate from january 2002 and there is about 10-20 GB daily data flow
> through each drive, 3-5 daily tape-mounts. Both drives are set
Hi,
you problem is the sama as Arnaud's I replied to just seconds ago. The data
in the old copypool does not dissapear until it is expired, or until you
explicitly delete the volumes with discarddata=y. This last action is a bit
dangerous is the sense that you fulle depend on the other data on th
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kilchenmann Timo
> We use a Compaq MSL5026SL tapelibrary. Device class "DLT" is configured to
> use SDLTC recording format. Compression is ON until TSM does access the
> drives for the first time - after that compression is OFF (
Hi all,
one of LTO 3583 (2 drives) we take care of still didn't clean drives. It is
operate from january 2002 and there is about 10-20 GB daily data flow
through each drive, 3-5 daily tape-mounts. Both drives are set to ASNEEDED
cleaning frequency, but no clean occured from january (!!), no dirty
Hi,
TSM does not limit the number of copies of data you have. So your 'old' copy
pool CopypoolA keeps the data until it is expired. For some files this will
be never. 'Delete volume discarddata=y' is the way to go. Possibly
followed by a 'del stg CopypoolA'.
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:18:18 +020
Hi all,
a question to copy-pools :
today I have one copy-pool where the copies of all stg-pools go in.
For performance issues I would like to split this pool (different
device-classes ...).
I can now define a second copy-pool, and start copying one of my stg-pools
to this copy-pool.
But how can
Hi all,
We use a Compaq MSL5026SL tapelibrary. Device class "DLT" is configured to
use SDLTC recording format. Compression is ON until TSM does access the
drives for the first time - after that compression is OFF (according to
library/drive configuration information). TSM Server is 4.2.1.0 on W2K
We have asked this same question to Tivoli support and can not get a good
answer. If you are concerned about the differences in the number of files,
as well you should, you should also be concerned about the amount of space
in both. If you have a the basic TSM setup of a primary diskpool, a primar
Hi *SM'ers !
Could someone give me an explanation on following topic : I had a storage pool called
stgpoolA, wich had copy made daily on a copy storage pool called CopypoolA. For
technical reasons I moved all data from stgpoolA to a new primary stgpool called
stgpoolB, wich is having daily cop
60 matches
Mail list logo
