hi,
how can i disable restores under normal conditions and allow some node
to restore at any time i want? but this shouldn't prevent daily backup
schedules.
regards,
Burak Demircan
CEO / ITT
MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676)
fax :+90 212 481 11 54
Try this process:
Run QUERY CONTENT on the volumes that won't reclaim and see if it comes
back with 'No Data'. If so then change the volume to READO, run AUDIT
VOLUME 'volume name' FIX=YES. Then DELETE VOLUME 'volume name'
DISCARDDATA=yes' BUT ONLY IF VOLUME CONTENT CAME BACK WITH NO DATA.
Hello Advancer
i have a simple question:
A tape(volume) status=full or filling access=readonly. if my wait someday
then 100% data expire,The tsm server will automatic change status=empty or
not?
Thank you:)
Tony W
If the storage pool that the volume belongs to has a reuse delay of 0 then
the volume will goto empty and then return to scratch. Else, it will goto
PENDING and wait until those days pass then goto empty.
Thanks,
Robert Rippy.
From: Tony W [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/24/2002 07:37 AM
Please
Try updating the volume to READO and then run 'AUDIT VOLUME 'volume name'
FIX=Y' then try 'DELETE VOLUME 'volume name' DISCARDDATA=YES'
that might work for you.
Thanks,
Robert Rippy.
From: Mario Behring [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/22/2002 07:03 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL
Ich werde ab 24.12.2002 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
06.01.2003.
Die E-Mail wurde nicht weitergeleitet!
Hi,
have you experienced such incomplete incremental, following this error
message ?
12/24/2002 05:34:22 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=933 from
fioGetDirEntries: \\hqvevw04\f$ \Users\aboulet\Nestle
12/24/2002 05:34:23 ANS4987E Error processing '\\hqvevw04\f$ ': the object
is in use by another
Run a CHKDSK of the drive and you will probally find some problems there
that is causing TSM to stop. I've ran into something similar like this
before.
Thanks,
Robert Rippy.
From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/24/2002
08:58 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor
This is IC33280.
- For 4.2 clients: fixed in 4.2.2 and up
- For 5.1 clients: fixed in 5.1.1 and up
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i
anybody have any tips on what type of Network transfer rate we should be
seeing for our backups over gigabit ethernet? the clients backup via copper
Gb ethernet dedicated for backups to a tsm server connected to a 3494 tape
library with 10 3590 tape drives via fibre channel/brocade switch.
there
That is impossible. It's the way TSM works.
-Original Message-
From: Mario Behring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM Policy Model
Hi list,
Where can I find some documented examples of TSM policies for backup and
Its possible. Just create retention policies that retain unlimited copies
with a nolimit retention. That way once a volume is full, it will stay full
because nothing will expire. Not that I would recommend it, but it is
possible.
Thanks,
Robert Rippy.
From: Remeta, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
I would not recommend it either. I would recommend reading some TSM
documentation to get a better understanding of the way the product works.
Depending on how much data he backs up on a nightly basis this would make
his database grow quite fast. Not to mention the number of tapes he would go
Where can I find some documented examples of TSM policies for backup and
archive operations ?
Have you read through the Administrator's Guide? It fully details all
aspects of the product, with examples.
We have a 4.2.1.9 TSM server running under OS/390. The database has been
getting bigger and performance has been getting worse. We decided to run
a test to see how long it would take to dump and reload the database. We
ran a 'prepare' command to create a recovery plan based on our onsite
database
Even unlimited copies/retention wouldn't guarantee this: if someone
deleted a bunch of files on their client drive, then they will be expired
during the next incremental backup. If the deleted files happen to
comprise 95% of a tape, the voile! you now have a full volume with only 5%
valid data.
Hi,
I am getting agonizingly slow (~1GB/hr) performance on tape to tape copies
(such as during reclamations). Is this normal? This is a new install,
fairly fresh with some basic policies and copy groups. The server is an AIX
5.1 ML02 7026-M80 with 8GB RAM. The tape library is an IBM 3584 with
We are running a 4.2.1.9 TSM server under OS/390. We started seeing
crippling performance problems when the database got up around 15
gigabytes. Increases in bufpoolsize, region size, and available real
memory (by shifting memory from another logical partition on the
same processor complex) had
do you have tape drive compression and client compression turned on?
I've seen this before with AIT drives trying to compress already compressed
data...
-Original Message-
From: Wheelock, Michael D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL
--HELP !
---I took yearly backups last night and archived them for a year. But the
migration utility ---migrated them to backuppool instead of offsite pool.
How can I get these copied off of ---backuppool to offsite pool now?
---This is what I wanted to kick off: backup stgpool 8mmexpool
Yes just backup the stgpool you migrated the data to to the offsitepool.
This will backup all the data on the next stgpool though, not just the stuff
you migrated off last.
-Original Message-
From: Taha, Hana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL
D'oh! Don't know what I was thinking, of course you are correct. And yes,
while this is theoretically possible, it's not something that most users
would wish to do.
Thanks!
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
Tom, I have seen the server get sluggish after running a long time,
and I suspect a memory leak was the cause. I can't remember if 4.2.1.9
had the problem. I am at 4.2.3.2 and it is running good.
Bill
At 11:37 AM 12/24/2002, you wrote:
We are running a 4.2.1.9 TSM server under OS/390. We
You have to define FILE class and set maxcap less than CD size. The data
will be split in several TSM volumes (files) and each volume will go on
separate CD.
Have in mind that volume label of the CD must match the filename (TSM
volume label). Look at TSM Administrator's Reference (v5.1 for AIX,
--- ... I don't know if this is necessary or not.
It is not necessary and will not help (you may even lose performance if
several drives are available). TSM server is smart enough and even without
collocation setting each process will migrate data for separate node (to
separate tape). With
Bill,
main portion of the R/3 data is within the RDBMS (be it DB2, Oracle or
other) but not *all*! You can perform online backup of the DB2 database
but it will be out of sync with R/3 activity and other data. The result -
you may get an inconsistent backup, restore will be down an unsupported
Burak,
I recall you asked the same question in May.
You cannot achieve what you want but you can get something close. Set
MAXNUMMP=0 for all offending nodes. Backups should go to disk and server
will migrate data to tape. Restores from diskpool ought not to hurt you.
For the node you want to
Performance is good when writing from disk to tape? How good? When I hear
of this I suspect driver issues. I know on Win2K driver selection is
paramount when having a performance problem with tape.
Kelly J. Lipp
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What kind of performance are you seeing?
I would expect a number greater than 20,000 KB/sec as reported by a client
summary.
I also would expect it to be highly variable and dependent on client speed.
I believe that Gig E is going to be faster than just about anything else in
all but the highest
I am getting agonizingly slow (~1GB/hr) performance on tape to tape copies
(such as during reclamations).
What experiments have you performed to try to narrow down the problem?
What results do you see in an experiment where data is copied between the
same two tape drives outside of TSM?
Given the
I have an AIX client running very slow backups, we have been looking into a
couple of things, when we noticed something strange. If we run an archive on
the box instead of a selective backup the speed improves by like 4 times...
So many factors...apples, oranges, and grapefruit. Various
You are already having the value too high. Do not mess commtimeout with
idletimeout.
Commtimeout is for client-server conversation. In LAN environment default
value of 60 (seconds) ought to be more than enough. For WAN links it may
need to be increased but I will not go beyond 150-180 sec.
That's why IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager (former Tivoli Software
Distribution) is made for. And there are many other similar products on
the market. This can be a long discussion irrelevant to this list so you
can contact me directly.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Macmurray, Andrea
Two Windows client fixtests, 5.1.5.4 and 5.1.5.6, have been removed from
the FTP server because of a potential data corruption problem with online
LAN image backups only, and only on Windows 2000 with those two fixtests.
The 5.1.5.0 PTF and 5.1.5.2 fixtest do not contain the problem.
Windows
Je serai absent(e) du 23.12.2002 au 29.12.2002.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. Voir avec PHL si besoin.Merci.
Just reinstall the client, some files weren't installed properly.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Ouzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 8:11 AM
Subject: Error on Version 5.1.5 Client
Hi
I installed a new version client 5.1.5 on Windows XP
Hi
I installed a new version client 5.1.5 on Windows XP and got when running a
gui backup this error message:
ANS0106E Read index: Message index not found for message 15257
The backup after it run successfully (included restore ...)
Please advice ... Regards
Robert Ouzen
Helpdesk Manager
37 matches
Mail list logo
