This is a specific requirement of a more general topic: since TSM know what
it is doing, it can certainly tell us. I would ask development to give us
some dashboard information about lots of things that go on within. Other
items I can think of: during a restore, how many objects left to restore.
Hi everybody,
In the TSM Administrative Guide the preemption of processes is described.
When a BACKUP STGPOOL process is running, can it be preempted (both for
a volume or a mountpoint) by a client restore? The Administrative Guide
says the (among others) Backup, archive, or HSM migration can be
Hi,
I have to migrate from ADSM 4.3.3 to TSM 4.2 in AIX 4.3.3 with a 3494
robot.
Is there some tips or documentations about this procedure ?
Actually, I have to write some script as well in order to migrate data
and ejection/injection.
Thanks for information.
Serge
Hi Jurjen,
High priority processes, concerning mount points, are db backup, client
backup, client restore, so yes, a backup stgpool job can be preempted by
any of the above processes.
Cheers.
Arnaud
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management
Hi all,
I have a problem on our W2K-Servers :
to have a faster restore on user profiles we used to backup the
profiles-directory of the users more often then the rest of the machines.
That was when we had novell-servers. The selective statement was easy.
Now with w2k we have the problem that the
Hi *SM'ers
Does anybody know if there is a possibility to check if a running expiration process
is finishing the work of a previous one that had to be canceled, or if it is a
brand new one that has just began a full scan from TSM DB.
I need that info to build a script that basically would
Hi Michelle
First of all, the problem doesnt sound like one where an audit library
would solve the problem. Have you checked the drive for errors, or if
there are a tape stuck in the drive?
What kind of library are you running TSM against?
The audit library with checklabel=yes will take quite
On Friday, Jan 24, 2003, at 21:20 Australia/Sydney, Michelle Wiedeman
wrote:
one of my drives in the library continues to produce errors and is
taken
offline by tsm.
01/24/03 11:00:45 ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/rmt1, error
number=46.
01/24/03 11:00:51 ANR8792E Unrecoverable drive
From my experience, yes it can. One minor nit; TSM doesn't always pick
the most
sensible process to cancel. I've seen instances where TSM has cancelled
the
BACKUP STGPOOL process that's just started a 40 GB file, and of course
the
process must finish the file before going away...
Cheers,
--
Paul
We had our 3494 library with two 3590 drives installed two years ago, and
for the first six months we were seeing failed drives at least twice a
week. In the end, it turned out that 3590 drives in a library need these
extra little things called 'locking clips' or something to hold the tapes
steady
You could also backup db, which should commit recovery log to database, thus
emptying out the log. Another way (if you have additional diskspace
somewhere else), is to create another log volume the other place, at least
the same size as the current, and after it is finished creating the new
Hi,
Last night I tried to use the new feature allowing me to copy to an offsite copy pool
at the same time I did backups. One of my servers had 2 files fail to backup - and
this caused my offsite copy to fail. Does anyone know why this is true?
I hate the way a backup is deemed failed
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:32:44 +0100
PAC Brion Arnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the fast reply!
Just one problem: my volumes are not empty. The volumes are all
defined and used by TSM. An example:
Volume Name (Copy 1) /tsm/log/daslogL3014002.LOG
Copy Status Sync'd
Volume Name
TSM Server=MVS OS/390 4.2.3
Our client backups and DB backups go to a Magstar 3590 Tape Subsystem.
Currently the Devconfig Volhist files are kept on DASD and are updated
automatically when the TSM DB is updated. We do a full volume backup of
our DASD every evening after our batch production is
Hi,
According to TSM Support - the expiration will pick up from right where it left off
the last session - but I am not sure I believe it - we had 125 scratch tapes fill up
rapidly because expiration was not completing every day.
Jane
-Original Message-
From: PAC Brion Arnaud
I hate the way a backup is deemed failed because
1 or 2 files don't back up... I was told this was
a feature ...
Whoever told you this is wrong. The failure to back up
an individual file during incremental backup should not
result in a failed backup. In and of itself, skipped
files should not
Sona,
I'm not sure exactly what problem you are having now but are you
following the steps in the Using Tivoli Data Protection for Microsoft SQL
Servers redbook. There is a specific step you need to go through when
restoring the mast db using the Rebuildm.exe utility. The steps are in
Hi TMS'ers,
I hope someone outhere could help us with this problem.
Our customer has TSM server 4.1.5 on windows NT.
AS/400 client backing up via BRMS.
The problem is, BRMS reports an amount of data backed up (for example 2 Gb) and TSM
resports an amount completelty different (for example 12 Gb
Our client backups and DB backups go to a Magstar 3590 Tape Subsystem.
Currently the Devconfig Volhist files are kept on DASD and are updated
automatically when the TSM DB is updated. We do a full volume backup of
our DASD every evening after our batch production is finished. The TSM
backup of
I have a customer which is implementing an Oracle dabase on his linux
redhat machine, and I was wondering if any of you gurus, knew what could
be done with tivoli to back this up.
The customer says he preffers hot backups. What do you think.
Thanks,
Camilo Marrugo
--
Camilo A. Marrugo
Data
I don't understand why this archive test reports a failure in one instance
and success in another. The first is listed as Action Archive. I have taken
the information from the command file that reports a failure and created
this schedule so the directories being archived are exactly the same and
Hello list,
We are organizing an Oracle 9i backup using RMAN and TDP 2.2.1. on W2K.
TSM server 5.1.5 is running on AIX.
We want to make
daily backups (30 versionen),
weekly backups (4 Versions)
monthly backups (12 versions).
using different management classes.
I am rather familiar
Hi Geoff,
Unless you made a typo in your post, it looks like your are missing the
hyphen ( - ) before the description option.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL
Just write a Unix script that tsm kicks off with a command action
schedule and then have that script put the tablespaces in backup mode, do a
dsmc arch of the data files, control files, and archive logs then have it
take the tablespaces back out of backup mode. You can get a list of data
Thanks, I will give it a try. I am pretty sure that it should work.
Thanks again,
Camilo Marrugo
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 11:20, Justin Bleistein wrote:
Just write a Unix script that tsm kicks off with a command action
schedule and then have that script put the tablespaces in backup mode,
Top of message
-- 01-24-03 08:40 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Backing up Devconfig Vo
We have the same configuration as you. The Volhist/Devconf files are
copied to cartridge daily with standard OS/390 utility in a batch job.
You can use
Unless you made a typo in your post, it looks like your are
missing the hyphen ( - ) before the description option.
Regards,
Andy
Not a typo, and that did it. How did I miss that?
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (858)
*SMers,
Does anyone out there have any experience running the current Tivoli 5.1.5
Linux client on Linux kernel 2.5.x ? I realize the documentation states
support is at Linux kernel 2.4.x.
Thanks. John
I am working on testing a restore of a Win2K server. I read in the Redbook
that the System Objects will only restore to the original location. I noted:
Tivoli Storage Manager 4.1.2 cannot restore system objects to locations
other than their original locations.
I am running TSM server 5.1 and
Hello all,
I have a several questions regarding upgrading tivoli 4.2.1 to 5.1.5 on AIX
4.3??
1) Can tivoli 5.1.5 run on AIX 4.3---I am guessing this would work but
leads to my other questions.
2) If I upgrade tivoli on current AIX 4.3.3 what happens when I want to
upgrade my AIX 4.3.3 to AIX
Can anyone tell me what the affect is if a filespace no longer exists? Lets
say either a drive D on a Windows server or /cost1 is no longer on a unix
client. The filespace is no longer on the new client with the same name so
it hasn't been touched in say 180 days. What is really there? Does the
I would like to expand this question to include Space Reclamations. Is
there a setting in TSM to tell it that any Space Reclamations are of lower
priority than migrations and backup stg pool procedures? I have issues when
a bunch of Space Reclamations will start before migrations and backup stg
Others can correct me if I am wrong. Extra versions (inactive) are still
controlled by the management class. The final active versions are kept
forever. TSM does not know if they were deleted or the filespace went bad
for some reason. Thus one has to hand delete them from TSM if they are not
HI,
I just upgraded AIX 4.3.3 to TSM 5.1.6
Yes - TSM can run on AIX 433,
and there is instructions in the manual that state the upgrade to TSM 5 should be
installed before AIX 5,
and no you shouldn't have to deinstall
The steps are simple - install (this performs an upgrade DB). Then register
You are correct. Inactive versions will expire per management class
criteria. The active versions will stay around forever (*). The reason for
this is as you stated: TSM errs on the side of caution since it has no
knowledge of the status of the file system.
(*) ... at least until another
is this the right syntax for excluding a filesystem?
exclude/.../unix/../
exclude/.../core/../
exclude/.../.SpaceMan/.../*
exclude.fs /.../u01/.../*
exclude.fs /.../u02/.../*
exclude.fs /.../u03/.../
exclude.fs
Hi,
I have the following doubts in order to setting up the schedulers services
in the exchange cluster nodes:
1. To setting up the scheduler in the primary node, I use the following
parameter with the dsmcutil command:
dsmcutil ... /optfile:x:\ExcVirtual1_dsm.opt
Should it be the shared drive x
Hi,
so you did hot backup and cold restore, if I understand correctly what you
did.
What works for me is hot backup and hot restore,
what means , after having blown files away,
I reinstall naked operating system first in this directory where it has been
previously booted and backuped from.
Hi,
I have the following environment:
TSM Server 5.1.5.2 on AIX 5.1, a FC Adapter 6228 and an IBM LTO 3583 with
SANDataGateway.
When the library is performing an intensive write process, I get the
following messages in the activity log:
01/07/03 17:02:48 ANR8311E An I/O error occurred while
TSMers,
My company is working toward restructuring the way we backup end users'
data. Currently, we have 2450 workstations (desktops and laptops - Win95,
WinNT, Win2000, WinXP) that we backup to our TSM server (AIX 5.1, TSM
4.2.3.2). Each of these nodes is in a schedule that backups one time
Henry,
I had similar poblems when copying from tape to tape, especially with large
files ( 1 GB). I've solved it by changing the SCSI chain (two SCSI
controllers in TSM server). It was first SCSI1-drive1 and
SCSI2-ROBOT-DRIVE2. I've changed it to SCSI1-DRIVE1 and SCSI2-DRIVE2-ROBOT
so that the
We point the user applications (Word, Excel, proprietary apps, etc.) to the
users home directory on the file server, and then just backup the file
server(s).
Douglas C. Nelson
Distributed Computing Consultant
Alltel Information Services
Chittenden Data Center
2 Burlington Square
Burlington, Vt.
Is there a way to keep the inactive version expiring?? If a client calls me
and wants to hold data for a node, if I just stop backups, then eventually
expiration will get the inactive copies and that is not what we want. And
if you change mgmt class for the node, the inactive copies won't be
Kurt,
I used two of the four SCSI chains from the SDG, the first chain for the
robot and the second chain for the drives, like IBM recommends in its web in
the document Recabling SDG.
But this procedure didn't solve the problem.
Henry Aranda
From: Kurt Beyers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM:
You don't say which version of TSM you are using, but if it is anywhere near
recent, and you want to exclude the entire file system then I would say
exclude.fs /u01
exclude.fs /u02
...
Have fun!
Kai.
Nobody ever lay on their deathbed saying, 'Gee! I wish I had spent more
time at the office.' --
I have the following doubts in order to setting up the schedulers
services
in the exchange cluster nodes:
1. To setting up the scheduler in the primary node, I use the following
parameter with the dsmcutil command:
dsmcutil ... /optfile:x:\ExcVirtual1_dsm.opt
Should it be the shared drive
On Saturday, Jan 25, 2003, at 06:23 Australia/Sydney, Jay Volovsek
wrote:
I would like to expand this question to include Space Reclamations. Is
there a setting in TSM to tell it that any Space Reclamations are of
lower
priority than migrations and backup stg pool procedures? I have
issues
On vrijdag, jan 24, 2003, at 18:24 Europe/Amsterdam, John Bremer wrote:
*SMers,
Does anyone out there have any experience running the current Tivoli
5.1.5
Linux client on Linux kernel 2.5.x ? I realize the documentation
states
support is at Linux kernel 2.4.x.
Thanks. John
John,
I assume
48 matches
Mail list logo